What was the point of the arguido questions asked of Kate and Gerry McCann?

[Mr Gray]

Then supply the evidence. Let us see what you base your opinion on.

Read back I've done it many times

[faithlilly]

Read back I've done it many times

You aren’t stalling are you Davel ?

Let me help get you started.

Forensic traces of someone in the apartment....none
Evidence of illegal entry into apartment....none

[Mr Gray]

You aren’t stalling are you Davel ?

There, a, whole thread on it

[faithlilly]

There, a, whole thread on it

Oh
Edit: removed hounding comment

[Erngath]

You aren’t stalling are you Davel ?

Let me help get you started.

Forensic traces of someone in the apartment....none
Evidence of illegal entry into apartment....none

Perhaps if competent forensic procedures had been followed, such evidence would have been found. IMO

[faithlilly]

You would have us believe that there is copious evidence to an abduction yet seem reluctant to furnish the rest of the forum with it. Why ? If you have provided it before then surely it’s just a simple matter of cut and pasting the information?

[Mr Gray]

You would have us believe that there is copious evidence to an abduction yet seem reluctant to furnish the rest of the forum with it. Why ? If you have provided it before then surely it’s just a simple matter of cut and pasting the information?

What's the point when you obviously  have a very short memory.. You will forget it all tomorrow... It's, all been done before...

[John]

What's the point when you obviously  have a very short memory.. You will forget it all tomorrow... It's, all been done before...

If I recall correctly nobody has ever been able to produce any evidence of abduction which begs the question as to why SY have been dogmatic in their approach to this theory in the face of such absence?

[Mr Gray]

If I recall correctly nobody has ever been able to produce any evidence of abduction which begs the question as to why SY have been dogmatic in their approach to this theory?

SY said based on the evidence they believe maddie was abducted...

3 possibilities
Parental involvement... Very unlikely ...based on evidence
Woke and wandered... Highly unlikely  according to the final report... Presumably they have some evidence to make such a statement
Leaves, abduction

[Erngath]

If I recall correctly nobody has ever been able to produce any evidence of abduction which begs the question as to why SY have been dogmatic in their approach to this theory in the face of such absence?

I assume , perhaps mistakenly, that when SY ask for extra funding, they have to present some evidence, information, details which warrant the extra money.

[Robittybob1]

You aren’t stalling are you Davel ?

Let me help get you started.

Forensic traces of someone in the apartment....none
Evidence of illegal entry into apartment....none

Because the abduction happened after Madeleine left the apartment on her own IMO.  so we don't expect
"Forensic traces of someone in the apartment....nor
Evidence of illegal entry into apartment.

[Mr Gray]

Because the abduction happened after Madeleine left the apartment on her own IMO.  so we don't expect
"Forensic traces of someone in the apartment....nor
Evidence of illegal entry into apartment.

The forensic exam may well not have been thorough and the patio door was open

[Robittybob1]

SY said based on the evidence they believe maddie was abducted...

3 possibilities
Parental involvement... Very unlikely ...based on evidence
Woke and wandered... Highly unlikely  according to the final report... Presumably they have some evidence to make such a statement
Leaves, abduction

"Woke and wandered... Highly unlikely  according to the final report... Presumably they have some evidence to make such a statement "  The only evidence comes from the parents and they think they are involved.  The PJ can't use that as reliable evidence IMO.

The McCanns also say they didn't do it, but the PJ don't believe them on that note.

[Mr Gray]

"Woke and wandered... Highly unlikely  according to the final report... Presumably they have some evidence to make such a statement "  The only evidence comes from the parents and they think they are involved.  The PJ can't use that as reliable evidence IMO.

The McCanns also say they didn't do it, but the PJ don't believe them on that note.

You are making an assumption  that the only evidence is from the parents... More likely in my opinion the pj had some evidence

[Angelo222]

"Woke and wandered... Highly unlikely  according to the final report... Presumably they have some evidence to make such a statement "  The only evidence comes from the parents and they think they are involved.  The PJ can't use that as reliable evidence IMO.

The McCanns also say they didn't do it, but the PJ don't believe them on that note.

Woke and wandered is the only theory which IS SUPPORTED BY THE EVIDENCE!!

She might well have been abducted afterwards but the difficulty is that if this is ever established then the blame goes back to the parents.