Author Topic: What was the point of the arguido questions asked of Kate and Gerry McCann?  (Read 34520 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Carana

"Woke and wandered... Highly unlikely  according to the final report... Presumably they have some evidence to make such a statement "  The only evidence comes from the parents and they think they are involved.  The PJ can't use that as reliable evidence IMO.

The McCanns also say they didn't do it, but the PJ don't believe them on that note.

Is this supposed to be double-think, whereby both investigations stress that the parents aren't suspects but it's a wink to the world in general that they are?

Confused.com

Offline Carana

Woke and wandered is the only theory which IS SUPPORTED BY THE EVIDENCE!!

What evidence?

Offline Robittybob1

What evidence?
Tracking dogs (oK as bad as the cadaver dog alerts)
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Woke and wandered is the only theory which IS SUPPORTED BY THE EVIDENCE!!

She might well have been abducted afterwards but the difficulty is that if this is ever established then the blame goes back to the parents.

good to see you think parental involvement is not supported by the evidence

Offline Robittybob1

Woke and wandered is the only theory which IS SUPPORTED BY THE EVIDENCE!!

She might well have been abducted afterwards but the difficulty is that if this is ever established then the blame goes back to the parents.
I don't understand that really, what they did doesn't change from one scenario to the next.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Angelo222

Is this supposed to be double-think, whereby both investigations stress that the parents aren't suspects but it's a wink to the world in general that they are?

Confused.com

Surely you don't believe anything the police say in the middle of a live investigation?
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Angelo222

What evidence?
Well let's see  *%6^

For starters, two sniffer dogs deployed independently very shortly after she was reported missing followed HER SCENT out of the apartment and around the block to the car park opposite mini reception where it mysteriously disappeared just like her.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Mr Gray

Surely you don't believe anything the police say in the middle of a live investigation?

I take everything that is going on a piece all the bits together to reach a conclusion...the sniffer dog evidence you are basing your theory on is not relaible

Offline Angelo222

I don't understand that really, what they did doesn't change from one scenario to the next.

The difference is that in my scenario their negligence created the situation.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Mr Gray

Well let's see  *%6^

For starters, two sniffer dogs deployed independently very shortly after she was reported missing followed HER SCENT out of the apartment and around the block to the car park opposite mini reception where it mysteriously disappeared just like her.

read the files again the two dogs were not independent and it was suggested that the second dog simply followed the trail  of the first...it was also suggested that the trail could have been laid down the previous day

Offline Angelo222

I take everything that is going on a piece all the bits together to reach a conclusion...the sniffer dog evidence you are basing your theory on is not relaible

I'm afraid your attempt to discredit those dogs won't work.  Both dogs followed her scent over the exact same ground.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Angelo222

read the files again the two dogs were not independent and it was suggested that the second dog simply followed the trail  of the first...it was also suggested that the trail could have been laid down the previous day

Sniffer dogs seldom fail as all experts know and by using two dogs the GNR corroborated the finding.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Mr Gray

I'm afraid your attempt to discredit those dogs won't work.  Both dogs followed her scent over the exact same ground.

have you read what it says in the files...exactly what I have said

Offline Angelo222

have you read what it says in the files...exactly what I have said

Try thinking outside the box davel.  Several British detectives also agree that it is a distinct possibility.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Mr Gray

Try thinking outside the box davel.  Several British detectives also agree that it is a distinct possibility.
I'm not saying it is not a possibility..im saying the evidence you quote is not as strong as you think