Should SY set up a special unit to investigate ALL missing child cases?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Provides balance.

Do you believe the PJ should be above criticism?

[barrier]

Do you believe the PJ should be above criticism?

Scotland Yard should receive 7 times the amount of criticism imo seeing as that's how many years its taken not to find an alleged abductor.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Scotland Yard should receive 7 times the amount of criticism imo seeing as that's how many years its taken not to find an alleged abductor.

That's just silly.  Aren't the PJ working on an investigation too?

[barrier]

Scotland Yard should receive 7 times the amount of criticism imo seeing as that's how many years its taken not to find an alleged abductor.

That's just silly.  Aren't the PJ working on an investigation too?

Which part,the fact they've taken 7 yrs,or they haven't found an  alleged abductor.
The difference between the PJ & SY is that the PJ haven't published any updates or  nonsense about various persons of interest who supposedly were involved in an alleged burglary gone wrong.

[Robittybob1]

Which part,the fact they've taken 7 yrs,or they haven't found an  alleged abductor.
The difference between the PJ & SY is that the PJ haven't published any updates or  nonsense about various persons of interest who supposedly were involved in an alleged burglary gone wrong.

I think you are wrong to call it nonsense.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Which part,the fact they've taken 7 yrs,or they haven't found an  alleged abductor.
The difference between the PJ & SY is that the PJ haven't published any updates or  nonsense about various persons of interest who supposedly were involved in an alleged burglary gone wrong.

Your argument was that the Met should receive 7 times the criticism to represent the 7 years that have elapsed without solving the case.  So by this calculation how many times the criticism should the PJ get, seeing as they too appear not to have solved the case either?

[Robittybob1]

Your argument was that the Met should receive 7 times the criticism to represent the 7 years that have elapsed without solving the case.  So by this calculation how many times the criticism should the PJ get, seeing as they too appear not to have solved the case either?

Nearly twice as much as the Met get as a rough estimate IMO.

[sadie]

I think you should bring this to the attention of OG. There is a deffo connection. It  worries me that we have  a blood line kidnapper on the loose in Europe, thank god for Brexit.  Who will be next in this blood line I wonder.

Can you do projection analysis chats  Sadie.. people should be warned about this

 

Some more to come if I get time 

[Lace]

With no outcome then it can be reasonably argued that the PJ were right not to follow these said leads,its cost upward of £11 million and counting to not find out what happened, its been asked before but just what budget do the PJ receive and why should a special budget be set aside for the McCann case above others?

No,  all leads should have been followed up,   you are only saying the PJ were right not to follow these leads,  as according to you they have no outcome.   You have said that with no 'In my opinion'   as you have no idea what outcome SY have had.  According to you,   the PJ had magic powers they look into the future and see what outcome these leads would have.

How am I to know what budget the PJ receive.

You say 'why should a special budget be set aside for the McCann's case above others'   do you mean SY or the PJ?     If SY then in my opinion,   they are investigating as Madeleine didn't have a fair investigation.   There aren't many abductions of a British child abroad as far as I can see and there were new leads found in Madeleine's case.   IMO

[jassi]

No,  all leads should have been followed up,   you are only saying the PJ were right not to follow these leads,  as according to you they have no outcome.   You have said that with no 'In my opinion'   as you have no idea what outcome SY have had.  According to you,   the PJ had magic powers they look into the future and see what outcome these leads would have.

How am I to know what budget the PJ receive.

You say 'why should a special budget be set aside for the McCann's case above others'   do you mean SY or the PJ?     If SY then in my opinion,   they are investigating as Madeleine didn't have a fair investigation.   There aren't many abductions of a British child abroad as far as I can see and there were new leads found in Madeleine's case.   IMO

I'm sure police can recognise that some 'leads' are not leads at all and discard them as time-wasting rubbish.
OG seem to have spent a lot of time on this. IMO

[Alice Purjorick]

I'm sure police can recognise that some 'leads' are not leads at all and discard them as time-wasting rubbish.
OG seem to have spent a lot of time on this. IMO

It is almost as though they are expecting to have fo field questions on "why did you not follow this "lead" " further down the track.
"I know it's daft beyond all reason and comprehension but let's block it off just in case"

[Lace]

I'm sure police can recognise that some 'leads' are not leads at all and discard them as time-wasting rubbish.
OG seem to have spent a lot of time on this. IMO

So are you saying the PJ were able to tell just by looking that the leads were rubbish?   Yet SY didn't think they were?  OG seem to have spent a lot of time on this you say,   well yes,  as they have investigated everything, leaving no stone unturned as they say,  which in the case of a missing child it is expected. IMO

[jassi]

So are you saying the PJ were able to tell just by looking that the leads were rubbish?   Yet SY didn't think they were?  OG seem to have spent a lot of time on this you say,   well yes,  as they have investigated everything, leaving no stone unturned as they say,  which in the case of a missing child it is expected. IMO

OG has been paid large sums of money to investigate, so that is what they have done irrespective of how pointless it might have been. They will continue to do so as long as additional money is forthcoming. Again IMO

[Lace]

OG has been paid large sums of money to investigate, so that is what they have done irrespective of how pointless it might have been. They will continue to do so as long as additional money is forthcoming. Again IMO

OG have been given money as they have proven they have leads to investigate.   As long as there is a realistic lead to investigate they will continue.   IMO

[jassi]

OG have been given money as they have proven they have leads to investigate.   As long as there is a realistic lead to investigate they will continue.   IMO

As long as money is available there will always be leads -IMO