Jeremy Bamber - The Campaigner Blog

[Myster]

Andrea you are totally wrong there was no real evidence to convict Jeremy Bamber and I don't think it's a laughing matter either that millions of pounds has been spent on this case and there is no conclusion.
The CCRC has seen far more evidence in this case than anyone on this forum. They haven't spent years looking at different evidence. I cannot believe that you are not looking for all the PII evidence surrounding this case should be released once and for all. Surely this would be beneficial to everyone and tie up some loose ends. As I have said before even John himself says Jeremy could be the unluckiest man alive.
That means John thinks there is a chance Jeremy could be innocent.

Maybe John should visit Jeremy himself and ask the questions face to face.

I am sure the CCRC will look at the new submissions very very carefully and I am sure there will definately be some longer more in depth documentaries aimed at getting the case more into the public arena.

I hope more evidence is uncovered one way or another.  Jeremy told me himself he was looking forward to the aga being forensically examined so he must be expecting a good result from that when they have the funds

And that's why as far as the CCRC are concerned the Jeremy Bamber case is over.

You will never get a straight answer from him, in just the same way no-one got a truthful answer from Ted Bundy, until shortly before his execution.

The truth is.... the public have only a passing interest in Jeremy Bamber, and any documentary, as the last ITV one has shown would have little if any influence on the outcome.

What's the point of 'forensically examining the AGA' twenty-eight years after the event?
(Evidence from it would have no relevance anyway, as it's been converted to oil)

[insider]

Andrea you are totally wrong there was no real evidence to convict Jeremy Bamber and I don't think it's a laughing matter either that millions of pounds has been spent on this case and there is no conclusion.
The CCRC has seen far more evidence in this case than anyone on this forum. They haven't spent years looking at different evidence. I cannot believe that you are not looking for all the PII evidence surrounding this case should be released once and for all. Surely this would be beneficial to everyone and tie up some loose ends. As I have said before even John himself says Jeremy could be the unluckiest man alive.
That means John thinks there is a chance Jeremy could be innocent.

Maybe John should visit Jeremy himself and ask the questions face to face.

I am sure the CCRC will look at the new submissions very very carefully and I am sure there will definately be some longer more in depth documentaries aimed at getting the case more into the public arena.

I hope more evidence is uncovered one way or another.  Jeremy told me himself he was looking forward to the aga being forensically examined so he must be expecting a good result from that when they have the funds

Jackie....why do you delude yourself so??   >@@(*&)

The case against Jeremy has been well and truly proven by a mountain of real evidence given by lots of real people and deliberated on by a real jury who came to the real conclusion that he was guilty.  Really!!


How much realer do you require it to be??

[Andrea]

Jack, if Bamber himself ever decided to come clean and admit to blowing holes in his family for money, you still wouldnt belive it, you would say it was beaten out of him, or he was forced in  another way to confess.

Look at Sheila, i mean c'mon do you really think she caused the carnage that went on in WHF that night/morn?
You are blinkered, Jack. He is guilty. GUILTY AS SIN. The only time he will come out of prison is in a coffin.

But on the other hand, he can think himself quite lucky, had he  committed this crime in some other parts of the world he would have swung.

[puglove]

Jack, if Bamber himself ever decided to come clean and admit to blowing holes in his family for money, you still wouldnt belive it, you would say it was beaten out of him, or he was forced in  another way to confess.

Look at Sheila, i mean c'mon do you really think she caused the carnage that went on in WHF that night/morn?
You are blinkered, Jack. He is guilty. GUILTY AS SIN. The only time he will come out of prison is in a coffin.

But on the other hand, he can think himself quite lucky, had he  committed this crime in some other parts of the world he would have swung.

That's a thought!!

I don't think that anyone can compare Julie's cheque book fraud with the decimation of 3 generations of a family. And why would Julie choose to come back in 2002? That was one hell of a gamble for someone whose original evidence was apparently a pack of lies. She risked losing everything.

And another thing. Bamber, who recently wrote so movingly (it certainly got me moving) about family life at WHF, at the time couldn't even be ar$ed to show his face at their church memorial service. He tried to pretend that he didn't know about it (how could he NOT, the whole village knew) when he had, in fact, had plenty of notice and reminders from his cousins. Absolutely despicable, but so typical.

[John]

Jack, if Bamber himself ever decided to come clean and admit to blowing holes in his family for money, you still wouldnt belive it, you would say it was beaten out of him, or he was forced in  another way to confess.

Look at Sheila, i mean c'mon do you really think she caused the carnage that went on in WHF that night/morn?
You are blinkered, Jack. He is guilty. GUILTY AS SIN. The only time he will come out of prison is in a coffin.

But on the other hand, he can think himself quite lucky, had he  committed this crime in some other parts of the world he would have swung.

That's a thought!!

I don't think that anyone can compare Julie's cheque book fraud with the decimation of 3 generations of a family. And why would Julie choose to come back in 2002? That was one hell of a gamble for someone whose original evidence was apparently a pack of lies. She risked losing everything.

And another thing. Bamber, who recently wrote so movingly (it certainly got me moving) about family life at WHF, at the time couldn't even be ar$ed to show his face at their church memorial service. He tried to pretend that he didn't know about it (how could he NOT, the whole village knew) when he had, in fact, had plenty of notice and reminders from his cousins. Absolutely despicable, but so typical.

I never heard about that Shona.  Was it long after the funerals?

[jackiepreece]

An interesting blog from Jeremy Bamber re the PPI issues, for me I would live to see any recordings released even if it is a matter of Simon McKay getting to listen to them without them being released.

"New Submissions to the Criminal Cases Review Commission."

Firstly thank you to all who have sent me Christmas and Birthday cards and gifts which provided a much needed boost to a very mercurial year for my case. Producing the text for “A Life of Less Liberty” made me vividly remember some of the happiest times with my family that I lost.  We all, at Christmas time look back, and owing to the recent loss of a friend to cancer, I was reminded of the issues of my own existence and the struggle for freedom, but all of us have to look forward, and pull together to achieve the justice which we are entitled to in our democratic society.


January has been a really busy month and I’ve had my head down working through material for McKay Law, and the new submissions to the Criminal Cases Review Commission. We have also obtained a further 23 folders of legal material and this is currently being scanned and scheduled with the help of a number of campaigners working hard, which is brilliant so thank you to those people who directly contribute to my case as the material is essential for proving our attempts at disclosure from Essex Police.

March and April will see a writing campaign; “Disclosure; Transparency; Justice; Freedom.” We have had many responses from MP’s offering to help regarding the non-disclosure of material. A detailed report is currently being prepared which will specifically reference Home Office police evidence that we know exists, but has been denied to me for 27 years. There are no laws which prevent this material from being handed over so there should be no problem with this issue in theory.

Secondly, we are also going to tackle the issue of documents which we know exist (again according to Home Office records and CCRC confirmation) that are held under Public Interest Immunity. It is almost 30 years and there can no longer (and never has been) a legitimate reason for the immunity of this material, and we are asking campaigners to support our request for the evidence by contacting their local MP’s, who can currently become involved directly as the case is no longer with the CCRC. So watch this space for the start of the campaign and relevant material you will need to send to your MP.

The updates on the web site are slowly happening and all material is either being re-written or academically referenced to case documents specifically. Keep an eye out on all pages of the site as all new/updated pages will have a date of the last update, this is because as new evidence becomes uncovered the text will be added to with further citations.

The next step of my televised interview will be through the lawyers and progress will be slow. I have been approached by 3 television companies wanting to carry out the interview and have selected a particularly experienced and established documentary maker to interview me.

This will come after footage of prisoner Luke Mitchell, convicted of killing Jodi Jones, passing a lie detector test was placed onto you tube with permission from The Ministry of Justice.  During my time in prison I have met no other prisoners maintaining innocence who are willing to sit the test and I believe that it will go a long way to helping Mitchell with his innocence campaign.


January also saw the launch of a new blog by one of my campaigners, it makes for great reading so catch up with the frequent updates at

http://jeremybambercampaigner.blogspot.co.uk

Jeremy
Jeremy Bamber at Friday, February 01, 2013

[Matthew Wyse]

He can look through files and folders until the cows come home but it does not change any thing.  Sheila was murdered and the only person who could have done it is still alive and well. 

[Milly]

but its the same old same old every time.  i could post stuff going back years where he was claiming the same naff progress but nothing ever ever comes of it.  sad but true.   

He can look through files and folders until the cows come home but it does not change any thing.  Sheila was murdered and the only person who could have done it is still alive and well.

[Dillon]

but its the same old same old every time.  i could post stuff going back years where he was claiming the same naff progress but nothing ever ever comes of it.  sad but true.   

He can look through files and folders until the cows come home but it does not change any thing.  Sheila was murdered and the only person who could have done it is still alive and well.

I just get deja vu when I see this tripe. It is all whistling in the dark. There is no chance that Sheila was guilty . That's it .

[Mr Justice K]

You are correct Shona, I stand corrected.  In mitigation I can only say that it has been a long day.

[puglove]

I'll do this one more time, because it matters to me. If Sheila had lived, or breathed for even 2 seconds after the first shot, which stunned her and knocked her out, she would have coughed, gagged, panicked, her face, chin, neck, would be splattered with blood. Nothing. Just the tracks from the second shot. The first shot, by the bed, was a knock-out punch. When Bamber (or whoever) tried to stage the "suicide" they found a faint pulse. Then had to re-load again. It's mighty convenient that Sheila, crazy with meds, had one bullet left, then needed another one. So. A small, slight young woman, with so many problems, had the wherewithall to shoot herself to the side of her neck, with all the agony and shock that it entails, after she'd killed her lovely twins, battered her Dad, and shot June between the eyes. Without a single sign of evidence. For God's sake. It's not Midsummer Murders.

[ActualMat]

I am looking out for NN who has left the blue forum and told me we might see her here.....bring it baby!

 

[puglove]

I am looking out for NN who has left the blue forum and told me we might see her here.....bring it baby!

 

Gosh, really? Was she overwhelmed by the waves of HRT over there? I look forward to sparring with the Nunnage. If she dares!!     

[Andrea]

Why has NN left blue?

[goatboy]

I'll do this one more time, because it matters to me. If Sheila had lived, or breathed for even 2 seconds after the first shot, which stunned her and knocked her out, she would have coughed, gagged, panicked, her face, chin, neck, would be splattered with blood. Nothing. Just the tracks from the second shot. The first shot, by the bed, was a knock-out punch. When Bamber (or whoever) tried to stage the "suicide" they found a faint pulse. Then had to re-load again. It's mighty convenient that Sheila, crazy with meds, had one bullet left, then needed another one. So. A small, slight young woman, with so many problems, had the wherewithall to shoot herself to the side of her neck, with all the agony and shock that it entails, after she'd killed her lovely twins, battered her Dad, and shot June between the eyes. Without a single sign of evidence. For God's sake. It's not Midsummer Murders.

That's spot on Shona. I've always struggled to believe it was Sheila given the very last bullet just happened to be the fatal one. But anyway, as you say it just beggars belief that she could have got up and shot herself again with quite a serious wound (a non fatal one we accept, but pretty serious and enough to knock you out).