Google and look at the EVIDENCE
JFK was not a stressful event to the vast majority of people so it isn't really relevant apart from his wife whose memory was probably shot to pieces
I will look at the article but I imagine it is not in the context of a mothers memory after the loos of her daughter
The so-called flashbulb memory syndrome, of which the JFK assassination is the classic example, is not about how closely related to the event a person is , or how much it actually affected them, as the assassination would have affected JFK's wife.
The concept relates to how the 'bystanders', near or far, reacted - the 'I'll never forget where I was when I heard the news' phenomenon. Anne refers to this in that thread as well and this is the conversation to which I was referring in my previous post here.
If I were to ask you, Davel, where were you on September 11th 2001, you would, like the rest of us, be able to give a reasonably detailed account of where you were and what you were doing, much more so than a random date plucked from the calendar. That ability has nothing whatsoever to do with your actual connection to the event itself. It has everything to do, however, with how memory works when it comes to recounting what we did in our own lives, and hence its study is an important tool in cases like this one.