Author Topic: The name calling which marks this case out.  (Read 31614 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline G-Unit

Re: The name calling which marks this case out.
« Reply #150 on: April 25, 2018, 10:26:09 AM »
The GNR were not trained to handle abductions from what I understand so it is not a matter of having a choice.

Which is why they brought in the PJ; just in case the parents were correct.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The name calling which marks this case out.
« Reply #151 on: April 25, 2018, 11:28:28 AM »
'A litany of blame all aimed at others'  you say.    Kate had been accused of hiding her child's body,   Ricardo showed her the video of the dogs and kept stopping it and saying blood had been found belonging to Madeleine,  the DNA matched Madeleine,   this was her daughter they were talking about.   Can't you imagine the horror she must have felt [no you can't as you think the McCann's are guilty]    but try and imagine for one minute that they are innocent.   Can you imagine being accused of that crime?   So what would you be thinking 'what a nice man' maybe?   Get real.
And not only that but being accused by the same man you had previously considered to be on your side, almost like a friend.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The name calling which marks this case out.
« Reply #152 on: April 25, 2018, 11:31:06 AM »
Which is why they brought in the PJ; just in case the parents were correct.
So not as Angelo claimed because the parents we're acting strange... The PJ we're brought in because a crime was suspected
« Last Edit: April 25, 2018, 11:54:04 AM by Robittybob1 »

Offline Robittybob1

Re: The name calling which marks this case out.
« Reply #153 on: April 25, 2018, 11:55:38 AM »
Which is why they brought in the PJ; just in case the parents were correct.
Hours later.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline G-Unit

Re: The name calling which marks this case out.
« Reply #154 on: April 25, 2018, 12:33:30 PM »
'A litany of blame all aimed at others'  you say.    Kate had been accused of hiding her child's body,   Ricardo showed her the video of the dogs and kept stopping it and saying blood had been found belonging to Madeleine,  the DNA matched Madeleine,   this was her daughter they were talking about.   Can't you imagine the horror she must have felt [no you can't as you think the McCann's are guilty]    but try and imagine for one minute that they are innocent.   Can you imagine being accused of that crime?   So what would you be thinking 'what a nice man' maybe?   Get real.

She had been accused of nothing when she decided to give silly nicknames to GNR officers.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: The name calling which marks this case out.
« Reply #155 on: April 25, 2018, 12:49:02 PM »
I made a statement of fact, what's your problem with it?
There is nothing wrong with it as a bald fact.
The Arab World consists of 236MM people of whom 18MM are non muslim.
By inspection it can be seen that more than 90% of The Arab World are muslims.
Your hinting at perceived ignorance stereotyping or whatever it was on your part, because most arabs will kneel on their mat to pray at the appropriate time will not stand up to objective scrutiny.

"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: The name calling which marks this case out.
« Reply #156 on: April 25, 2018, 12:59:32 PM »
I have reported your comment a it is clearly an ad hom but before it gets deleted perhaps you would care to explain in what way my comment was
a) childish
b) ignorant
c"small beer" (whatever that means)
It is a fact that some people find the two comments I mentioned highly offensive and take especial exception to them being used in relation to the PJ.  Perhaps you could comment on that, rather than on me.  Many thanks.

If you look carefully there is, at the end of the string of wordy things a funny shaped little Johnny with a dot on its tail. That is a question mark denoting the preceding wordy things frame a question. An ad hom attack cannot take the form of a question. It was more a sort of attack on your post designed to make you wonder whether or not your argument needed a few Acrow Props shoving under it to make it stand up.
I am sure there will be an expert on parsing and stuff along shortly to tell me where I am wrong.
Thank You
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The name calling which marks this case out.
« Reply #157 on: April 25, 2018, 01:07:57 PM »
If you look carefully there is, at the end of the string of wordy things a funny shaped little Johnny with a dot on its tail. That is a question mark denoting the preceding wordy things frame a question. An ad hom attack cannot take the form of a question. It was more a sort of attack on your post designed to make you wonder whether or not your argument needed a few Acrow Props shoving under it to make it stand up.
I am sure there will be an expert on parsing and stuff along shortly to tell me where I am wrong.
Thank You

An ad hom can take the firm of a question

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The name calling which marks this case out.
« Reply #158 on: April 25, 2018, 01:31:26 PM »
There is nothing wrong with it as a bald fact.
The Arab World consists of 236MM people of whom 18MM are non muslim.
By inspection it can be seen that more than 90% of The Arab World are muslims.
Your hinting at perceived ignorance stereotyping or whatever it was on your part, because most arabs will kneel on their mat to pray at the appropriate time will not stand up to objective scrutiny.
I didn't hint at anything, I stated it - praying like Arabs is a misnomer as not all Arabs pray the same way - fact.  Praying like Muslims would have been more accurate, if in fact Gerry & Kate were really ever in such a position, kneeling with their heads to the carpet, backsides aloft and palms down either side of their heads.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline slartibartfast

Re: The name calling which marks this case out.
« Reply #159 on: April 25, 2018, 05:06:33 PM »
which is libellous and which isn't then?

The one making damaging comments about someone working reputation.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline slartibartfast

Re: The name calling which marks this case out.
« Reply #160 on: April 25, 2018, 05:10:41 PM »
Childish repetition of abusive terms will be removed and if repeated may attract sanctions.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline G-Unit

Re: The name calling which marks this case out.
« Reply #161 on: April 25, 2018, 05:59:26 PM »
And not only that but being accused by the same man you had previously considered to be on your side, almost like a friend.

You make it sound like it was sprung on them. They knew very well which way the investigation was developing. Paiva had a job to do; nothing personal, I'm sure.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Robittybob1

Re: The name calling which marks this case out.
« Reply #162 on: April 25, 2018, 06:42:49 PM »
You make it sound like it was sprung on them. They knew very well which way the investigation was developing. Paiva had a job to do; nothing personal, I'm sure.
What makes you think "they knew very well which way the investigation was developing"? 
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The name calling which marks this case out.
« Reply #163 on: April 25, 2018, 06:44:13 PM »
The one making damaging comments about someone working reputation.
right so Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum causes no damage to someone's working reputation glad we got that sorted.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The name calling which marks this case out.
« Reply #164 on: April 25, 2018, 06:45:33 PM »
You make it sound like it was sprung on them. They knew very well which way the investigation was developing. Paiva had a job to do; nothing personal, I'm sure.
Which is all very well when looked at dispassionately as a third party and not in any way personally involved.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".