What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom

[Robittybob1]

Curtains.

[John]

Members are reminded to discuss the topic and not each other.  TY

[John]

Why would she not think that maddie could have  moved it. [first thought you would think]

Like if she had gone to toilet - why did she not look at maddies bed

The bit I still fail to comprehend is why the childrens bedroom door slammed at all as Kate claims she closed the patio door behind her?  If the patio door was closed there would not have been a through draft?  All very mysterious indeed IMO.

[Robittybob1]

The bit I still fail to comprehend is why the childrens bedroom door slammed at all as Kate claims she closed the patio door behind her?  If the patio door was closed there would not have been a through draft?  All very mysterious indeed IMO.

We looked at that question about a year ago, and there is a question mark over the window in the adult's bedroom window if that was ever closed properly.  The shutters were down, but it has never been confirmed if the window was closed.  I know we used the term Bi-fold so I wonder if it comes up on a search? http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7643.msg358528#msg358528

[Miss Taken Identity]

The bit I still fail to comprehend is why the childrens bedroom door slammed at all as Kate claims she closed the patio door behind her?  If the patio door was closed there would not have been a through draft?  All very mysterious indeed IMO.

create a loud bang and everyone ducks... one person standing can grab the silver...straight from an Agnatha Christie movie ..

[Robin Banks]

create a loud bang and everyone ducks... one person standing can grab the silver...straight from an Agnatha Christie movie ..

Yes the one standing person is the one who was expected the bang and the one who recreated the bang.

[kizzy]

The bit I still fail to comprehend is why the childrens bedroom door slammed at all as Kate claims she closed the patio door behind her?  If the patio door was closed there would not have been a through draft?  All very mysterious indeed IMO.

Same here....you would have thought the door would have slammed when patio door opened

oR if not... because the door was open wider....why didn't she see the curtains open and the draft  3 mtr away.

[Robittybob1]

Same here....you would have thought the door would have slammed when patio door opened

oR if not... because the door was open wider....why didn't she see the curtains open and the draft  3 mtr away.

Have you ever studied physics?

[Alice Purjorick]

The bit I still fail to comprehend is why the childrens bedroom door slammed at all as Kate claims she closed the patio door behind her?  If the patio door was closed there would not have been a through draft?  All very mysterious indeed IMO.

Another PdL first.
The cunning invisible device that inhibits pressure equilibrium in domestic buildings.....

[Robittybob1]

Another PdL first.
The cunning invisible device that inhibits pressure equilibrium in domestic buildings.....

.... an open window on the Southern side of the building IMO.

[Alice Purjorick]

.... an open window on the Southern side of the building IMO.

Well an openable something with a variable orifice on a timer to create a delayed reaction

[Angelo222]

.... an open window on the Southern side of the building IMO.

If that was the case Kate would have created a stronger through movement of air the moment she opened the patio door and that would have been very noticeable imo.

[Angelo222]

Have you ever studied physics?

You don't need a PHD in applied science to understand the movement of air around a single storey apartment.

[Robittybob1]

You don't need a PHD in applied science to understand the movement of air around a single storey apartment.

Even simple physics is all that is needed to answer the questions raised.

"Same here....you would have thought the door would have slammed when patio door opened

oR if not... because the door was open wider....why didn't she see the curtains open and the draft  3 mtr away."

Seeing is dependent on light and only once in the room did Kate become able to see into the low light intensity room.

Any slamming will be dependent on a gust of wind, and this could well have been of an intermittent nature as opposed to constantly blowing.

[Angelo222]

Even simple physics is all that is needed to answer the questions raised.

"Same here....you would have thought the door would have slammed when patio door opened

oR if not... because the door was open wider....why didn't she see the curtains open and the draft  3 mtr away."

Seeing is dependent on light and only once in the room did Kate become able to see into the low light intensity room.

Any slamming will be dependent on a gust of wind, and this could well have been of an intermittent nature as opposed to constantly blowing.

So if that was the case are you saying that the only gust of wind that night just happened to coincide with Kate's presence?