« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 32 33 [34] 35 36 ... 45   Go Down

Author Topic: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom  (Read 120070 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #495 on: May 31, 2018, 11:46:39 PM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on May 31, 2018, 08:56:15 PM
As you have already agreed he turned on the light in the reconstruction.
It was a TV programme.

If that is what you count as proof .....
Logged
What's up, old man?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #496 on: May 31, 2018, 11:50:10 PM »
Quote from: Alice Purjorick on May 31, 2018, 11:45:42 PM
The thingy with Jane Tanner stands whether there was a plot or no plot.
There are those who subscribe to a phrase attributed to Lenin. I don't believe I am allowed to be more direct than that on here so you will have to look it up......it contains the word useful.
What thingy?  As I said before I am interested in trying to understand the logic that drives people to conclude that numerous members of the Tapas group are involved in a highly convoluted plot.  I don’t think for one minute you are one of those people but thanks for continuing to draw attention to my question which hitherto has been completely ignored by those to whom it was addressed.
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Robittybob1

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #497 on: May 31, 2018, 11:51:14 PM »
Quote from: ShiningInLuz on May 31, 2018, 11:46:39 PM
It was a TV programme.

If that is what you count as proof .....
Was Amaral going to use the evidence from a reconstruction as proof?
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #498 on: May 31, 2018, 11:54:10 PM »
Quote from: Vertigo Swirl on May 31, 2018, 11:50:10 PM
What thingy?  As I said before I am interested in trying to understand the logic that drives people to conclude that numerous members of the Tapas group are involved in a highly convoluted plot.  I don’t think for one minute you are one of those people but thanks for continuing to draw attention to my question which hitherto has been completely ignored by those to whom it was addressed.
Well I have no issue with involving the Tapas 7 as in my theory they were involved in playing a prank on Kate.  But the prank is meant to be harmless bit of fun amongst friends, but it goes astray IMO.
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #499 on: May 31, 2018, 11:56:23 PM »
Quote from: slartibartfast on May 31, 2018, 11:35:12 PM
It wasn’t a reconstruction it was a dramatic TV program.
It wasn't the PJ reconstruction but it was a type of reconstruction for he sets out to demonstrate how his check was done.
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #500 on: June 01, 2018, 12:47:25 AM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on May 31, 2018, 11:51:14 PM
Was Amaral going to use the evidence from a reconstruction as proof?
Sorry, I haven't got a clue what you are talking about.
Logged
What's up, old man?

Offline Brietta

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #501 on: June 01, 2018, 12:54:49 AM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on May 31, 2018, 11:54:10 PM
Well I have no issue with involving the Tapas 7 as in my theory they were involved in playing a prank on Kate.  But the prank is meant to be harmless bit of fun amongst friends, but it goes astray IMO.

It is inconceivable that anyone among the McCann friends holidaying with them would contemplate any such "prank".
Logged
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Robittybob1

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #502 on: June 01, 2018, 01:39:32 AM »
Quote from: Brietta on June 01, 2018, 12:54:49 AM
It is inconceivable that anyone among the McCann friends holidaying with them would contemplate any such "prank".
Look if Prince William played a prank on Prince Harry on his wedding day any body is capable of playing a prank from time to time.  I don't see the reason you put up an objection.
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #503 on: June 01, 2018, 01:41:55 AM »
Quote from: ShiningInLuz on June 01, 2018, 12:47:25 AM
Sorry, I haven't got a clue what you are talking about.
Well it was Amaral's successor in fact that tried to organise a re-enactment of the night.  Don't you think that aspects of that re-enactment would be considered evidence?
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Brietta

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #504 on: June 01, 2018, 03:00:09 AM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on June 01, 2018, 01:39:32 AM
Look if Prince William played a prank on Prince Harry on his wedding day any body is capable of playing a prank from time to time.  I don't see the reason you put up an objection.

Can't you see how offensive such a suggestion is?  Not to mention defamatory.  Nobody in their right mind would consider playing a 'prank' of any kind involving a friend's sleeping child.  In my opinion even to lay a hand on a child in such a situation would be a criminal act.
Would you use a child to do such a thing to a friend?
Has it occurred to any of your friends to do it to you?  What kind of person would do such a thing?  We are not talking an innocent game of hide and seek here ... a child went missing.  That is a serious business and it is very serious to accuse people of involvement in any way whatsoever particularly if it is merely some outlandish invention.
Logged
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #505 on: June 01, 2018, 07:39:41 AM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on June 01, 2018, 01:39:32 AM
Look if Prince William played a prank on Prince Harry on his wedding day any body is capable of playing a prank from time to time.  I don't see the reason you put up an objection.
Prince William tied a ladder to Harry’s car, that’s a prank.  Removing a sleeping child from her bed only for her to disappear forever can hardly be defined as a prank, not by any normal definition of the word.
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline barrier

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #506 on: June 01, 2018, 08:13:42 AM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on May 31, 2018, 10:05:38 PM
Madeleine wandered over to Tapas.  Something happened once she was outside IMO.

A distinct possibility imo.
Logged
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #507 on: June 01, 2018, 08:15:41 AM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on June 01, 2018, 01:41:55 AM
Well it was Amaral's successor in fact that tried to organise a re-enactment of the night.  Don't you think that aspects of that re-enactment would be considered evidence?
A non-occurring reconstitution has nothing to do with a TV programme.
Logged
What's up, old man?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #508 on: June 01, 2018, 09:16:49 AM »
Quote from: ShiningInLuz on June 01, 2018, 08:15:41 AM
A non-occurring reconstitution has nothing to do with a TV programme.
I think Robbity’s point was a reconstitution would have proved nothing either.
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline jassi

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #509 on: June 01, 2018, 09:25:57 AM »
A reconstruction may have enabled a better understanding of movement and interactions that night, rather than proving anything.
Logged
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future
Pages: 1 ... 32 33 [34] 35 36 ... 45   Go Up
« previous next »