Author Topic: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom  (Read 120070 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline barrier

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #510 on: June 01, 2018, 09:29:51 AM »
A reconstruction may have enabled a better understanding of movement and interactions that night, rather than proving anything.

Might have eliminated some things quicker though.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #511 on: June 01, 2018, 09:30:21 AM »
A reconstruction may have enabled a better understanding of movement and interactions that night, rather than proving anything.
But whose version of events would they have followed?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Brietta

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #512 on: June 01, 2018, 10:12:12 AM »
Might have eliminated some things quicker though.
What a great pity it is that the PJ didn't think to arrange one sooner?
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline jassi

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #513 on: June 01, 2018, 10:28:27 AM »
But whose version of events would they have followed?

That would depend on who participated. As a last resort, the early statements of the group would have to do.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline jassi

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #514 on: June 01, 2018, 10:32:37 AM »
What a great pity it is that the PJ didn't think to arrange one sooner?

Indeed it is a great pity for all concerned.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline barrier

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #515 on: June 01, 2018, 10:33:48 AM »
Indeed it is a great pity for all concerned.

Probably would have saved a bit of landscaping.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Snowgirl

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #516 on: June 01, 2018, 11:27:40 AM »
A distinct possibility imo.
So you think Madeleine could have tidied her bed before getting out through the described as heavy door ,down the steps  opening and closing behind her ......thoughtful child ..... the gate ,despite her mother saying she would not have left the apt. .....this contradicting her telling Fiona that they’d left a door open so Madeleine could come to find them if she awoke distressed again ?

Offline barrier

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #517 on: June 01, 2018, 11:37:46 AM »
So you think Madeleine could have tidied her bed before getting out through the described as heavy door ,down the steps  opening and closing behind her ......thoughtful child ..... the gate ,despite her mother saying she would not have left the apt. .....this contradicting her telling Fiona that they’d left a door open so Madeleine could come to find them if she awoke distressed again ?

Its a possibility is what I wrote,not claimed.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #518 on: June 01, 2018, 12:03:37 PM »
Prince William tied a ladder to Harry’s car, that’s a prank.  Removing a sleeping child from her bed only for her to disappear forever can hardly be defined as a prank, not by any normal definition of the word.
I have not determined the nature of the prank yet both you and Brietta seem to suggest it involved removing a sleeping child.  I have not said anything like that.
"Prince William tied a ladder to Harry’s car, that’s a prank" but if that ladder had killed someone as Harry and Meghan drove away would it still be a prank?

Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #519 on: June 01, 2018, 12:05:14 PM »
That would depend on who participated. As a last resort, the early statements of the group would have to do.
But I thought they all differed wildly, so which one to go with?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #520 on: June 01, 2018, 12:06:43 PM »
I have not determined the nature of the prank yet both you and Brietta seem to suggest it involved removing a sleeping child.  I have not said anything like that.
"Prince William tied a ladder to Harry’s car, that’s a prank" but if that ladder had killed someone as Harry and Meghan drove away would it still be a prank?
Perhaps you could elucidate on the nature of the so-called prank then.  Give us a for instance.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Robittybob1

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #521 on: June 01, 2018, 12:07:13 PM »
I think Robbity’s point was a reconstitution would have proved nothing either.
But whatever mistakes were noted would be used against them never the less.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #522 on: June 01, 2018, 12:10:57 PM »
So you think Madeleine could have tidied her bed before getting out through the described as heavy door ,down the steps  opening and closing behind her ......thoughtful child ..... the gate ,despite her mother saying she would not have left the apt. .....this contradicting her telling Fiona that they’d left a door open so Madeleine could come to find them if she awoke distressed again ?
In my theory Madeleine left via the front door which appears easy to open, and no gates to contend with.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline jassi

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #523 on: June 01, 2018, 12:14:38 PM »
But I thought they all differed wildly, so which one to go with?

That's why it would have been better if the group had been there, as they would have been able to correct anomalies in statements, or alternatively concede particular errors.

If statements are so wildly different, is it any surprise that police came to certain conclusions ?
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Robittybob1

Re: What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom
« Reply #524 on: June 01, 2018, 12:15:19 PM »
Perhaps you could elucidate on the nature of the so-called prank then.  Give us a for instance.
Put it this way I think it had something to do with the child being carried by Totman.  (And I'm not saying that child was Madeleine, for she left by the front door IMO.)

Someone had to carry the ladder to the reception that was tied to Harry's car.  I don't think William went and fetched it IMO.  There would be helpers.
« Last Edit: June 01, 2018, 12:26:22 PM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.