The last video taken of Madeleine McCann.

[Vertigo Swirl]

If I thought my daughter had been abducted the only thing that would make me ‘ brighter’ is news that she had been found.

Thanks for sharing.

[jassi]

Did I say they were?

Well, you said it was photoshopped so I assumed that was what you meant.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Well, you said it was photoshopped so I assumed that was what you meant.

I think you know very well what I meant, what game is this you’re playing?

[Mr Gray]

There are groups of people on both sides who have got carried away by this case in my opinion. They see conspiracies and mysterious doings everywhere and will use any means to get their point of view across. In my opinion there were/are no conspiracies or mysteries and the only extraordinary aspect of this case is the unprecedented media attention it received, not just initially but for years.Thankfully that seems to be finally abating for some reason.

The video footage is very interesting with or without sound. Why are the twins so interested in what is happening to their left? Why aren't the two girls looking in that direction? Why isn't Gerry McCann smiling and relaxed like Fiona and Dianne?

could you give a cite for conspiracy groups on the supporters side,,...I havent seen any.....obviously there are conspiracies galore on the sceptic side

[faithlilly]

could you give a cite for conspiracy groups on the supporters side,,...I havent seen any.....obviously there are conspiracies galore on the sceptic side

Anyone agreeing that Sadie’s theory is feasible is part of a group who believes in conspiracies. G said groups of people not conspiracy groups.

[Mr Gray]

Anyone agreeing that Sadie’s theory is feasible is part of a group who believes in conspiracies. G said groups of people not conspiracy groups.

I see sadie as an individual...not a group........CMOMM is a conspiracy group,,,

so letes have acite of thos e agreeing with sadie to show she is a part of a group

[faithlilly]

I see sadie as an individual...not a group........CMOMM is a conspiracy group

But if you think sadies theory is feasible then you are part of a group who believes in conspiracies. Likewise if you are among a number of people who think the dog searches were conducted in a way that made the McCanns look guilty then you are part of a conspiracy group ( see StoptheMyths )

[Mr Gray]

But if you think sadies theory is feasible then you are part of a group who believes in conspiracies. Likewise if you are among a number of people who think the dog searches were conducted in a way that made the McCanns look guilty then you are part of a conspiracy group ( see StoptheMyths )

so who is part of sadies group...cite please

[Vertigo Swirl]

But if you think sadies theory is feasible then you are part of a group who believes in conspiracies. Likewise if you are among a number of people who think the dog searches were conducted in a way that made the McCanns look guilty then you are part of a conspiracy group ( see StoptheMyths )

What about if you believe that the McCanns were aided and abetted by one or more of their mates?

[Mr Gray]

But if you think sadies theory is feasible then you are part of a group who believes in conspiracies. Likewise if you are among a number of people who think the dog searches were conducted in a way that made the McCanns look guilty then you are part of a conspiracy group ( see StoptheMyths )

could you also now provide a cite for a group who believe the searches were conducted in such a way to make the mccanns looke guilty...
thats 3 cites required now

[Mr Gray]

weve had 3 claims now so 3 cites required

[Vertigo Swirl]

weve had 3 claims now so 3 cites required

I think Faithlilly is mistaking individuals for groups.

[faithlilly]

so who is part of sadies group...cite please

Anyone who believes her conspiracy theory is feasible ( of course that’s not you Dave you’re far to intelligent for that  )

[Mr Gray]

Anyone who believes her conspiracy theory is feasible ( of course that’s not you Dave you’re far to intelligent for that  )

so no cites...as expected

[faithlilly]

so no cites...as expected

What exactly do you want a cite for ?