The last video taken of Madeleine McCann.

[sadie]

Do you have a view as to why it was released in the first place ?

I wonder if it was released because it proves the fact that Madeleine did scraze her leg on the aeroplane steps?  Re: Keela alerting to blood

ETA.  Obviously my questioning thoughts on this are incorrect.  Proven thanks to Gunit researching the dates which do not tie up   

[Sunny]

I wonder if it was released because it proves the fact that Madeleine did scraze her leg on the aeroplane steps?  Re: Keela alerting to blood

You could well be right Sadie although I can't imagine there would be much blood from a small fall like that, or it could simply be because they wanted people to see that she was a normal happy child excited about going on holiday and that she actually was going on the holiday. I can't see who would actually doubt either of those things though.

[Robittybob1]

And this from the Yorkshire Post doesn’t convince you that the sound was always there ?

‘Mr McCann is looking serious, which prompts his friend to joke: “Cheer up Gerry, we are on holiday.” Laughter is heard throughout the rest of the clip.’

Read more at: https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/girl-slips-and-grazes-her-shin-on-steps-to-aircraft-in-video-footage-released-by-desperate-parents-1-2456983

The fact that there was never a statement from the Tapas 9 saying the soundtrack was faked, strongly supports the idea it was genuine.

[sadie]

The fact that there was never a statement from the Tapas 9 saying the soundtrack was faked, strongly supports the idea it was genuine.

But have they ever commented on stuff that is posted in forums ?  I am doubtful if they would engage at that level and imo, who could blame them ?

[Robittybob1]

But have they ever commented on stuff that is posted in forums ?  I am doubtful if they would engage at that level and imo, who could blame them ?

But those videos were shown by AP and Reuters.  Bit different from the forums.  Potentially libellous if it was faked IMO.

[G-Unit]

I wonder if it was released because it proves the fact that Madeleine did scraze her leg on the aeroplane steps?  Re: Keela alerting to blood

If so, wouldn't it have been released after Keela's visit?

[sadie]

If so, wouldn't it have been released after Keela's visit?

When was Keelas visit?  If it was after the release of the video, then obviously it needs looking at differently.

[G-Unit]

When was Keelas visit?  If it was after the release of the video, then obviously it needs looking at differently.

It was you who suggested that there might be a connection between the two. On what basis did you make that suggestion if you don't know the sequence of the two events?

[sadie]

It was you who suggested that there might be a connection between the two. On what basis did you make that suggestion if you don't know the sequence of the two events?

Post modified.  Thanks for your help 

[Eleanor]

Post modified.  Thanks for your help 

Thank goodness for some good manners.

[ShiningInLuz]

It was you who suggested that there might be a connection between the two. On what basis did you make that suggestion if you don't know the sequence of the two events?

Shhhhh! 

I don't think anyone has yet twigged the significance.   

[sadie]

Shhhhh! 

I don't think anyone has yet twigged the significance.   

    



Several times, historically, I have made it clear that with my eye sight problems, I cannot usually scour the internet as some of you can.  Sometimes my eyes are a bit better, but usually my eyesight can be variable

I always try to word my uncertain, investigating posts as "maybe" etc., or in this case "I wonder"

You, SIL, have made totally incorrect statements in your blog and as fact, when they are not.  Have you corrected your blog mistakes that I highlighted a few months back?   My bet is that they still stand.

Where is your integrity?


Several posters on here have laid into me because they have demanded a cite that I cannot find, but am confident was there once ( maybe still is, but perhaps I am looking in the wrong place ).

These same posters were asked for cites on several issues only a few weeks ago, but NONE were forthcoming

Such duplicity of standards to fail to give (several) cites themselves then repeatedly deprecate, belittle, a poster who has failed to find a cite. 
Hypocracy at its worst



..... and how many posters go back and adjust their posts when proven wrong ?
 ... please dont try and pull the wool over peoples eyes, cos everyone has got things wrong at times.

I may have made some mistakes, as the rest of you have, but at least I can hold my head up high.

[faithlilly]

   



Several times, historically, I have made it clear that with my eye sight problems, I cannot usually scour the internet as some of you can.  Sometimes my eyes are a bit better, but usually my eyesight can be variable

I always try to word my uncertain, investigating posts as "maybe" etc., or in this case "I wonder"

You, SIL, have made totally incorrect statements in your blog and as fact, when they are not.  Have you corrected your blog mistakes that I highlighted a few months back?   My bet is that they still stand.

Where is your integrity?


Several posters on here have laid into me because they have demanded a cite that I cannot find, but am confident was there once ( maybe still is, but perhaps I am looking in the wrong place ).

These same posters were asked for cites on several issues only a few weeks ago, but NONE were forthcoming

Such duplicity of standards to fail to give (several) cites themselves then repeatedly deprecate, belittle, a poster who has failed to find a cite. 
Hypocracy at its worst



..... and how many posters go back and adjust their posts when proven wrong ?
 ... please dont try and pull the wool over peoples eyes, cos everyone has got things wrong at times.

I may have made some mistakes, as the rest of you have, but at least I can hold my head up high.

No cite withdraw your claim. Those are the forum rules. If you can’t prove it don’t claim it is a fact.

[Mr Gray]

No cite withdraw your claim. Those are the forum rules. If you can’t prove it don’t claim it is a fact.

Then you need to withdraw your claim that Brexit could affect the ECHR case

[faithlilly]

Then you need to withdraw your claim that Brexit could affect the ECHR case

The ‘could’ suggests I didn’t state it as a fact.

CR working pro bono