Question about Nevill's watch

[ISpyWithMyEye]

No they're not.  JB needs to produce some evidence that undermines his conviction to the extent that 3 appeal court judges will take the view that had jurors heard it they may have returned a different verdict.

He’s already tried that, twice — and failed both times

In fact, not only did the appeal court reinforce the jury’s decision that Jeremy Bamber is guilty, but FURTHER evidence has come to light SINCE the original court case, that further proves his guilt.

At the original court hearing forensics established 13 out of a possible 20 markers which was enough to convince the court that the blood flake in the silencer could have only come from Sheila, as no-one else had those same markers .

In or around 2002 (I need to check) they retested that blood flake and found SEVENTEEN of Sheila’s blood markers, meaning it was a trillion to one that the blood was anyone else’s.

So if it DID ever get to appeal again, which it won’t, it would be thrown out again. And if there was ever a retrial, which again won’t happen imi, he will simply be found guilty again imo.

[Caroline]

I too can smell a fish. It has not been adequately explained how this person came to be in the possession of these items, and when pressed is unwilling to back their claims up.

Perhaps at this point we should bear in mind that this kind of memorabilia has a market, the value of which may be negligible now but who knows what could happen once Bamber shuffles off. He is after all amongst our most notorious child killers.

Jeremy must have elected AA to receive  the items. I'm satisfied that she is telling the truth and she has gone out of her way to provide pictures to back up what she says. Some questions have been a bit personal and from past experience of these forums, it's always best not to say too much.

[APRIL]

April wasn’t that kind of look briefly fashionable around 1988-89, during the yuppie era. The offending article could date from that time.

I have an idea that may have been second time around, Steve  -I can remember cropping actor friends' long hair back in the mid/late 70's when they landed parts demanding short hair-  but it doesn't mean it couldn't have been then. I don't think the "Hooray Henry" look would have done him too many favours inside.

[Aunt Agatha]

Jeremy must have elected AA to receive  the items. I'm satisfied that she is telling the truth and she has gone out of her way to provide pictures to back up what she says. Some questions have been a bit personal and from past experience of these forums, it's always best not to say too much.

Thank you Caroline

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Some of ‘these people’ will no doubt be of similar ilk to him, albeit not convicted mass murderers

You’re not kidding!

I’ve only looked at the blue forum twice, once after you gave a link to Aunt Agatha’s posts on there.

I saw a comment from one man which actually made my body flinch!

David1819....



[attachment deleted by admin]

[Caroline]

You’re not kidding!

I’ve only looked at the blue forum twice, once after you gave a link to Aunt Agatha’s posts on there.

I saw a comment from one man which actually made my body flinch!

David1819....

Oh yes ....... him 

[steve_trousers]

Jeremy must have elected AA to receive  the items. I'm satisfied that she is telling the truth and she has gone out of her way to provide pictures to back up what she says. Some questions have been a bit personal and from past experience of these forums, it's always best not to say too much.

Well, if you and John are satisfied thats something to think about and perhaps I was harsh. Sorry.

I chuckled it off as a practical joke when I saw a pony tail that supposedly belonged to Jeremy.

[Nicholas]

I have an idea that may have been second time around, Steve  -I can remember cropping actor friends' long hair back in the mid/late 70's when they landed parts demanding short hair-  but it doesn't mean it couldn't have been then. I don't think the "Hooray Henry" look would have done him too many favours inside.

Maybe, before he hooked up with Aunt Agatha, his intention to grow his hair long was in order to attract the attention of his fellow inmates ?

[ISpyWithMyEye]

But the advantage of the forum is that we have numerous pairs of eyes, many of whom have devoured the case, and no one has turned anything up.

And none of these pairs of eyes have turned up any evidence that Jeremy Bamber isn’t guilty...and you’ve been at it for years.

I can’t speak for others as I don’t know what they read, and as I’m new to this case I’ve been surprised when I’ve occasionally posted something that veteran members seemed unaware of — they hadn’t even READ it — and I’m including you, Holly

I’ve told you repeatedly that I will search for what bothers you so much, in MY time.

You like to doubt me all the time, but that’s because you don’t like the fact Jeremy Bamber is guilty as hell

[steve_trousers]

I have an idea that may have been second time around, Steve  -I can remember cropping actor friends' long hair back in the mid/late 70's when they landed parts demanding short hair-  but it doesn't mean it couldn't have been then.I don't think the "Hooray Henry" look would have done him too many favours inside.

Your right it wouldn’t have gone down well, trying to be some kind of dandy inside. He’s been attacked a couple of times that we know of.

[Caroline]

Well, if you and John are satisfied thats something to think about and perhaps I was harsh. Sorry.

I chuckled it off as a practical joke when I saw a pony tail that supposedly belonged to Jeremy.

I know he did have long hair at some point, didn't realise it was that long though. To be honest, I'd have lost that on purpose some years ago. There is something about disconnected hair that gives me the creeps 

[ISpyWithMyEye]

I can assure you the police do return property when it is no longer needed. If the items are bulky or such that they might attract undue attention they will deliver them to a designated keeper if asked. Can you really imagine AA walking down Chelmsford High Street with twins in a pram, a wetsuit and an air rifle slung over her shoulder?

Of course not.

But all property is sealed in bags, and has to be signed for.

I’ve always believed property has to be collected in person from the station where it’s kept.

I also can’t understand why they’d give someone a gun; supposedly belonging to the very man who’d been convicted of shooting five people dead.

[Nicholas]

But all property is sealed in bags, and has to be signed for.

I’ve always believed property has to be collected in person from the station where it’s kept.

I also can’t understand why they’d give someone a gun; supposedly belonging to the very man who’d been convicted of shooting five people dead.

All property is sealed in bags and usually has to be signed for when removing from HM prisons

Police do deliver property in person i.e. previously seized items

The gun is a strange one for me also ?

[Aunt Agatha]

I know he did have long hair at some point, didn't realise it was that long though. To be honest, I'd have lost that on purpose some years ago. There is something about disconnected hair that gives me the creeps 

I've kept it for DNA purposes if it's ever needed in the future to clear his name

[Nicholas]

I've kept it for DNA purposes if it's ever needed in the future to clear his name

 

Don’t believe you

Where would the DNA be extracted from exactly?

Plus the police already have Bamber’s DNA