Is the maddie fund.... now a secret fund

[G-Unit]

Gerry McCann is no fool;

Expresso interview September 2008

It’s that once the suspicion is installed, we can never prove our innocence again.
https://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2008/09/mccanns-in-expresso-interview.html

[Miss Taken Identity]

Gerry McCann is no fool;

Expresso interview September 2008

It’s that once the suspicion is installed, we can never prove our innocence again.
https://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2008/09/mccanns-in-expresso-interview.html

love this bit:"They are aged three and a half, and they are very, very happy.
"


This would be the same twins who the parents claimed at the trial were not affected by their sisters disappearance, but really affected by what Amaral  wrote in his book!


what about Kate saying there is  nothing to suggest anything bad happened to her....Oh I was thinking along the lines of : Kidnapped by from her bed in the middle of the night by  a gang of paedophiles only nice things would happen? ok no worries there then.

[John]

Slightly off-topic so consider myself rebuked in advance.  However, should Madeleine's Fund: Leaving No Stone Unturned Limited, have been properly renamed the Gerry and Kate Litigation Fund to reflect recent endeavours?  Any thoughts?

[jassi]

Slightly off-topic so consider myself rebuked in advance.  However, should Madeleine's Fund: Leaving No Stone Unturned Limited, have been properly renamed the Gerry and Kate Litigation Fund to reflect recent endeavours?  Any thoughts?

Wouldn't have the same emotive pull - except to the truly faithful. 
School kids would have held onto their pocket money and little old grannies onto their pensions

[Alice Purjorick]

Wouldn't have the same emotive pull - except to the truly faithful. 
School kids would have held onto their pocket money and little old grannies onto their pensions

If the "transparent figures" are anything to go by I would not worry too much about the pensioners and kids.
They appear to have worked out the full S.P. and given it the bird about nine years ago.

[Brietta]

Slightly off-topic so consider myself rebuked in advance.  However, should Madeleine's Fund: Leaving No Stone Unturned Limited, have been properly renamed the Gerry and Kate Litigation Fund to reflect recent endeavours?  Any thoughts?

What is the evidence that Madeleine's Fund financed any litigation?

[jassi]

If the "transparent figures" are anything to go by I would not worry too much about the pensioners and kids.
They appear to have worked out the full S.P. and given it the bird about nine years ago.

Yes , but they were lured in to begin with.

[Angelo222]

What is the evidence that Madeleine's Fund financed any litigation?

The fund has been considerably depleted and since hardly anything has been spent on any search for the child I think the answer is self evident.

[Alice Purjorick]

Yes , but they were lured in to begin with.

Possibly they were so too but they caught on a kin sight quicker than a lot did [apparently].....

[Sunny]

What is the evidence that Madeleine's Fund financed any litigation?

Well we know it financed the failed litigation against Goncalo Amaral for a start &  I wonder who paid Carter Ruck's retainer?

[Robittybob1]

Well we know it financed the failed litigation against Goncalo Amaral for a start &  I wonder who paid Carter Ruck's retainer?

You were asked for evidence.

[faithlilly]

You were asked for evidence.

The OFM accounts and Adam Tudor’s evidence to the select committee which was posted several times on the pro bono thread.

[Sunny]

You were asked for evidence.

As faithlilly said there is evidence to be found on the McCann company accounts but who asked me for evidence. The first mention of this is yourself Robittybob1. I am confused. Could you point me to where I was asked please?

I will find a link to the relevant page of the accounts if you want.

[Robittybob1]

As faithlilly said there is evidence to be found on the McCann company accounts but who asked me for evidence. The first mention of this is yourself Robittybob1. I am confused. Could you point me to where I was asked please?

I will find a link to the relevant page of the accounts if you want.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=9775.msg478489#msg478489  You replied to the post asking for evidence.

[Sunny]

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=9775.msg478489#msg478489  You replied to the post asking for evidence.

So are you saying Brietta's post was requesting evidence and myself by replying was agreeing to give evidence. If so please see these links

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/FUND_2010.htm

And Adam Tudor of Carter Ruck

Mr Tudor: Yes. My partners and I talked about it. We have a committee of partners that looks at whether or not a case is on a no win, no fee basis, as you probably heard from my partner, Mark Thompson. We did that with Kate and Gerry's case. It was a longer, more difficult discussion than would ordinarily be the case because of the extraordinary nature, volume and so on. We sent the complaints to The Express and The Star, at which point we were acting on a normal retainer. We indicated to Kate and Gerry and we told The Express and The Star at that time that if the matter was not resolved we would indeed go on to a no win, no fee arrangement.



https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmcumeds/uc275-iii/uc27502.htm

There is the evidence. I hope this answers your post.