Author Topic: Would the libel case had a different result if pecuniary damages weren't sought?  (Read 37766 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

So has Murat been cleared... We don't know...

Offline Vertigo Swirl

So has Murat been cleared... We don't know...
If the McCanns haven't been cleared then neither has he, IMO.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline slartibartfast

If the McCanns haven't been cleared then neither has he, IMO.

Has he ever claimed to have been cleared?
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Mr Gray

Has he ever claimed to have been cleared?

There you are..

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Has he ever claimed to have been cleared?
I'm fairly certain he would be more than a little taken aback if you were to tell him he hadn't been cleared IMO
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline slartibartfast

I'm fairly certain he would be more than a little taken aback if you were to tell him he hadn't been cleared IMO

He probably understands the Portuguese legal system and isn’t bothered.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

He probably understands the Portuguese legal system and isn’t bothered.
Isn’t bothered he hasn’t been cleared of involvement in Madeleine’s disappearance?  I think it’s far more likely he considers himself completely cleared of any involvement.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

He probably understands the Portuguese legal system and isn’t bothered.
He sounds quite bothered in this interview and confirms what I suspected- he considers himself completely cleared of involvement
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/10877239/Former-suspect-Robert-Murat-still-haunted-by-Madeleine-McCann-case.html
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline slartibartfast

He sounds quite bothered in this interview and confirms what I suspected- he considers himself completely cleared of involvement
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/10877239/Former-suspect-Robert-Murat-still-haunted-by-Madeleine-McCann-case.html

Has he claimed it in a court of law?
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Mr Gray

He probably understands the Portuguese legal system and isn’t bothered.

Do you think he would be bothered if an ex policeman wrote a book accusing him of complicity

Offline Mr Gray

Has he claimed it in a court of law?

what did duarte claim on behalf of the mccanns

Offline slartibartfast

Do you think he would be bothered if an ex policeman wrote a book accusing him of complicity

If a member of the investigation wrote a book on why the investigation decided  he should be made Arguido probably not an issue
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Mr Gray

If a member of the investigation wrote a book on why the investigation decided  he should be made Arguido probably not an issue

what if a member of the investigation made a tv documnetary saying they could prove he was involved in an abduction...that would be an issue

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Has he claimed it in a court of law?
No, why are you goalpost shifting?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

If a member of the investigation wrote a book on why the investigation decided  he should be made Arguido probably not an issue
That wasn‘t the question asked.   
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".