Author Topic: Were the media wrong to settle defamation actions out of court?  (Read 92347 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Were the media wrong to settle defamation actions out of court?
« Reply #435 on: August 02, 2018, 09:03:47 PM »
thatsounds like opinion...not fact...do you have a cite
I took it as opinion.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Were the media wrong to settle defamation actions out of court?
« Reply #436 on: August 02, 2018, 09:23:03 PM »
The very fact that the mccanns we're expected to prove their innocence is in breach of the ECHR... And a massive own goal for the SC... They are entitled to be presumed innocent... I've looked at quite a few rulings by the ECHR.... I doubt you are familiar with any

In 2011 Portugal's record at the ECHR was on a par with that of France. Italy was appealed against more times than either of them and Greece twice as many times. Spain was complained about less than the UK. Perhaps the group should have gone to Spain.
https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2012/jan/27/european-court-human-rights-judgments
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Were the media wrong to settle defamation actions out of court?
« Reply #437 on: August 02, 2018, 09:30:48 PM »
In 2011 Portugal's record at the ECHR was on a par with that of France. Italy was appealed against more times than either of them and Greece twice as many times. Spain was complained about less than the UK. Perhaps the group should have gone to Spain.
https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2012/jan/27/european-court-human-rights-judgments

every case is an individual case

Offline G-Unit

Re: Were the media wrong to settle defamation actions out of court?
« Reply #438 on: August 02, 2018, 10:29:41 PM »
every case is an individual case

True, and 97% are rejected.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Were the media wrong to settle defamation actions out of court?
« Reply #439 on: August 03, 2018, 07:05:59 AM »
True, and 97% are rejected.

Do you have a cite for this

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Were the media wrong to settle defamation actions out of court?
« Reply #440 on: August 03, 2018, 07:45:58 AM »
Do you have a cite for this

Maybe you should read the cite provided.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Were the media wrong to settle defamation actions out of court?
« Reply #441 on: August 03, 2018, 07:46:32 AM »
Maybe you should read the cite provided.
Gunit has not provided back cite

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Were the media wrong to settle defamation actions out of court?
« Reply #442 on: August 03, 2018, 07:48:21 AM »
Gunit has not provided back cite

See #436
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Were the media wrong to settle defamation actions out of court?
« Reply #443 on: August 03, 2018, 07:50:13 AM »
Maybe you should read the cite provided.
Simple courtesy would have solved the problem...
Current figures do not tally with that which is going back 50 years...I can't provide a cite at the moment

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Were the media wrong to settle defamation actions out of court?
« Reply #444 on: August 03, 2018, 07:50:56 AM »
See #436
I don't see why gunit could not have replied

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Were the media wrong to settle defamation actions out of court?
« Reply #445 on: August 03, 2018, 08:02:58 AM »
True, and 97% are rejected.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/reality-check-with-polly-curtis/2012/jan/25/european-court-of-human-rights

How many applications are there to the court? And how many are upheld?

The ECtHR annual report (pdf) for 2011 lists for the UK:

The number of applications: 2,766

The number declared inadmissible or struck out: 1,175

Applications referred to government: 68

Applications declared inadmissible: 27

Judgements overall: 21

Judgements resolved by unilateral withdrawal or friendly settlement: 3

Judgement finding at least one violation: 14

Judgements finding no violation: 7





your figures are way out of date...these figures show about 40%

Offline G-Unit

Re: Were the media wrong to settle defamation actions out of court?
« Reply #446 on: August 03, 2018, 08:07:38 AM »
I don't see why gunit could not have replied

Sorry, I was busy with other things; breakfast being one of them. 
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Were the media wrong to settle defamation actions out of court?
« Reply #447 on: August 03, 2018, 08:09:17 AM »
True, and 97% are rejected.

your stateemnt is false....you are quoting the present...97 does not represent the current rate of refusal

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Were the media wrong to settle defamation actions out of court?
« Reply #448 on: August 03, 2018, 08:14:55 AM »
your stateemnt is false....you are quoting the present...97 does not represent the current rate of refusal

The statement is true, based on the cite.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Sunny

Re: Were the media wrong to settle defamation actions out of court?
« Reply #449 on: August 03, 2018, 08:15:58 AM »
I think you misunderstand Inadmissable or Struck Out Davel. I think those didn't even get to the ECHR.

From your Cite IMO there were only 21 judgments given by the ECHR from 2,766 applications and of those only 14 found a violation so upheld the complainant.

14 out of 2766 is not 40%
Members are reminded that cites must be provided in accordance with the forum rules. On several occasions recently cites have been requested but never provided. Asking for a cite is not goading but compliance.

From this moment onward, posts making significant claims which are not backed up by a cite will be removed.

Moderators and Editors take note!