Author Topic: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?  (Read 43669 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #15 on: July 14, 2018, 09:17:17 PM »
im sure you are wrong...CR worked pro bono for the mccanns...give me a reason why they would not claim their charges which they were entitled to from the newspapers who agreed to settle

http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122164630/http://www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Witness-Statement-of-Gerald-Patrick-McCann.pdf

81.
I should mention that Carter-Ruck made clear that they would be willing to act for us in our libel dispute on the basis of a Conditional Fee Agreement, albeit that in the end
this was not necessary as Express Newspapers and Associated Newspapers did not contest our complaints. However, had it not been for the availability of a CFA, it would have been very difficult - if not impossible - for Kate and I to have brought the complaint as we do not have the resources to take on large media organisations in this way.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #16 on: July 14, 2018, 09:25:05 PM »
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122164630/http://www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Witness-Statement-of-Gerald-Patrick-McCann.pdf

81.
I should mention that Carter-Ruck made clear that they would be willing to act for us in our libel dispute on the basis of a Conditional Fee Agreement, albeit that in the end
this was not necessary as Express Newspapers and Associated Newspapers did not contest our complaints. However, had it not been for the availability of a CFA, it would have been very difficult - if not impossible - for Kate and I to have brought the complaint as we do not have the resources to take on large media organisations in this way.

So if you read the above you will see CR did not act on a CFA.. It wasn't necessarry... So it must have been pro bono
« Last Edit: July 14, 2018, 09:47:17 PM by Davel »

Offline faithlilly

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #17 on: July 14, 2018, 10:11:37 PM »
So if you read the above you will see CR did not act on a CFA.. It wasn't necessarry... So it must have been pro bono

It wasn’t necessary because the Express settled and that sum would have included the legal fees incurred.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #18 on: July 14, 2018, 10:23:41 PM »
Davel.

Thought I'd give you your cite (well sortof).

You were incorrect. It was a Conditional Fee Arrangment otherwise known as No Win No Fee. Not Pro Bono. It is on CR's own website.


https://www.carter-ruck.com/images/uploads/documents/McCann-Press_Release-03102014.PDF

And Gerry himself

I should mention that Carter-Ruck made clear that they would be willing to act for us in our libel dispute on the basis of a Conditional Fee Agreement, albeit that in the end

 this was not necessary
as Express Newspapers and Associated Newspapers did not contest our complaints. However, had it not been for the availability of a CFA, it would have been very difficult - if not impossible - for Kate and I to have brought the complaint as we do not have the resources to take on large media organisations in this way.


Sort of a bogof deal. Two cites for the price of one.

So there was no CFA ...it wasnt necessary...CR acted pro bono to the Mccanns but no doubt they collected fees from the newspapers

Offline faithlilly

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #19 on: July 14, 2018, 11:50:57 PM »
It is usual when suing when a CFA is in place for the litigants to have some kind of insurance to cover the legal costs if they lose. If the Express had not settled and the McCanns had lost the case this was possibly what would have paid CR. If the McCanns had lost with no insurance in place they would been lible for the legal costs themselves.

CR had agreed that they would act for the McCanns by way of a CFA so no matter what they would have been paid by one side or the other. As it happened the Express settled and paid the McCann’s legal costs. At no time where CR working for nothing because the felt sorry for the McCanns, believed their story etc, etc. It was a business agreement.

I believe CR were put on a retainer after that.
« Last Edit: July 23, 2018, 05:40:51 PM by John »
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #20 on: July 15, 2018, 12:30:38 PM »
Davel. You stated that the work was pro-bono way back up this thread.
Please provide evidence the legal representatives took no payment by whatsoever means for the works carried out.

pro bo·no
/ˌprō ˈbônō/
adverb

1.
denoting work undertaken without charge, especially legal work for a client with a low income:
"the attorneys are representing him pro bono"


there was no CFA in place.....CR acted for the McCanns without charge....I think pro bono is a reasonable description
« Last Edit: July 23, 2018, 05:44:19 PM by John »

Offline faithlilly

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #21 on: July 15, 2018, 12:32:33 PM »
pro bo·no
/ˌprō ˈbônō/
adverb

1.
denoting work undertaken without charge, especially legal work for a client with a low income:
"the attorneys are representing him pro bono"


there was no CFA in place.....CR acted for the McCanns without charge....I think pro bono is a reasonable description

Were CR paid ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Erngath

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #22 on: July 15, 2018, 12:35:45 PM »
It is usual when suing when a CFA is in place for the litigants to have some kind of insurance to cover the legal costs if they lose. If the Express had not settled and the McCanns had lost the case this was possibly what would have paid CR. If the McCanns had lost with no insurance in place they would been lible for the legal costs themselves.

CR had agreed that they would act for the McCanns by way of a CFA so no matter what they would have been paid by one side or the other. As it happened the Express settled and paid the McCann’s legal costs. At no time where CR working for nothing because the felt sorry for the McCanns, believed their story etc, etc. It was a business agreement.

I believe CR were put on a retainer after that.


Does " I believe" mean I know or I think or I presume or I assume?
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #23 on: July 15, 2018, 12:47:04 PM »

Does " I believe" mean I know or I think or I presume or I assume?

It means I know. It was

From the Select Committee

‘Mr Tudor: Yes. My partners and I talked about it. We have a committee of partners that looks at whether or not a case is on a no win, no fee basis, as you probably heard from my partner, Mark Thompson. We did that with Kate and Gerry's case. It was a longer, more difficult discussion than would ordinarily be the case because of the extraordinary nature, volume and so on. We sent the complaints to The Express and The Star, at which point we were acting on a normal retainer. We indicated to Kate and Gerry and we told The Express and The Star at that time that if the matter was not resolved we would indeed go on to a no win, no fee arrangement.’

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Nigel/id217.htm
« Last Edit: July 23, 2018, 05:47:47 PM by John »
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #24 on: July 15, 2018, 01:13:10 PM »
Were CR paid ?

In the case in question they acted pro bono for the mccanns and recovered  their fees from the ST.... As there was no CFA in place.
What is also true is that they only accept cases on a no win no fee basis where they have a very really chance if success

Offline faithlilly

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #25 on: July 15, 2018, 01:22:45 PM »
In the case in question they acted pro bono for the mccanns and recovered  their fees from the ST.... As there was no CFA in place.
What is also true is that they only accept cases on a no win no fee basis where they have a very really chance if success

Didn’t you read my previous post ? CR were on a retainer so they were being paid by the McCanns or someone on behalf of the McCanns.


‘Mr Tudor: Yes. My partners and I talked about it. We have a committee of partners that looks at whether or not a case is on a no win, no fee basis, as you probably heard from my partner, Mark Thompson. We did that with Kate and Gerry's case. It was a longer, more difficult discussion than would ordinarily be the case because of the extraordinary nature, volume and so on. We sent the complaints to The Express and The Star, at which point we were acting on a normal retainer. We indicated to Kate and Gerry and we told The Express and The Star at that time that if the matter was not resolved we would indeed go on to a no win, no fee arrangement.’

As to the very real chance I absolutely agree. The case was a slam dunk as the headlines were so outrageous.

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Nigel/id217.htm
« Last Edit: July 23, 2018, 05:51:20 PM by John »
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #26 on: July 15, 2018, 05:49:57 PM »
pro bo·no
/ˌprō ˈbônō/
adverb

1.
denoting work undertaken without charge, especially legal work for a client with a low income:
"the attorneys are representing him pro bono"


there was no CFA in place.....CR acted for the McCanns without charge....I think pro bono is a reasonable description

The Law Society does not concur with your assessment. Furthermore if you work out the contractual relationships your own argumnet becomes self defeating.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline faithlilly

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #27 on: July 15, 2018, 11:31:19 PM »
that was 8 years ago...do you have any evidence that the arrangement was continued

Let’s not stray off of the point Davel. You claimed that CR worked for the McCanns pro bono. I have proved that CR was paid by the Express when they settled out of court. Before that the McCanns via the fund, or the individuals picking up their lawyers tab, were paying CR a retainer. At no time did CR work pro bono and to claim they did shows your lack of understanding.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #28 on: July 18, 2018, 01:39:41 PM »
that was 8 years ago...do you have any evidence that the arrangement was continued

Do you have any evidence about pro bono  when it commenced to when it was concluded.?
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Sunny

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #29 on: July 22, 2018, 12:03:44 AM »
Surely Sadie that is what cites are for - to separate fact from fiction.   Davel has yet to provide the requested cite despite being asked several times.
« Last Edit: July 22, 2018, 07:52:45 AM by slartibartfast »
Members are reminded that cites must be provided in accordance with the forum rules. On several occasions recently cites have been requested but never provided. Asking for a cite is not goading but compliance.

From this moment onward, posts making significant claims which are not backed up by a cite will be removed.

Moderators and Editors take note!