In the case in question they acted pro bono for the mccanns and recovered their fees from the ST.... As there was no CFA in place.
What is also true is that they only accept cases on a no win no fee basis where they have a very really chance if success
Didn’t you read my previous post ? CR were on a retainer so they were being paid by the McCanns or someone on behalf of the McCanns.
‘Mr Tudor: Yes. My partners and I talked about it. We have a committee of partners that looks at whether or not a case is on a no win, no fee basis, as you probably heard from my partner, Mark Thompson. We did that with Kate and Gerry's case. It was a longer, more difficult discussion than would ordinarily be the case because of the extraordinary nature, volume and so on. We sent the complaints to The Express and The Star, at which point we were acting on a normal retainer. We indicated to Kate and Gerry and we told The Express and The Star at that time that if the matter was not resolved we would indeed go on to a no win, no fee arrangement.’
As to the very real chance I absolutely agree. The case was a slam dunk as the headlines were so outrageous.
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Nigel/id217.htm