Author Topic: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?  (Read 43768 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Erngath

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #225 on: July 26, 2018, 06:58:06 PM »
I don't agree it winds up posters...it just makes the moderator look a bit of a fool

It amuses some to believe thus.

Not wound up at all.

Bemused is a more apt description.
« Last Edit: July 26, 2018, 07:03:53 PM by Erngath »
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #226 on: July 26, 2018, 07:01:34 PM »
The whole nine yards is based on an unfounded rumour of an abduction.

In your opinion....based on solid evidence imo....and SY it seems

Offline barrier

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #227 on: July 26, 2018, 08:16:46 PM »
In your opinion....based on solid evidence imo....and SY it seems


Still to be resolved,so its still  unfounded.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #228 on: July 26, 2018, 08:34:33 PM »

Still to be resolved,so its still  unfounded.

Based on solid evidence IMO
« Last Edit: July 26, 2018, 10:29:47 PM by slartibartfast »

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #229 on: July 26, 2018, 09:48:37 PM »
Director's loan x 2?

That would work, it would need to be recorded but does not appear to be and would need to be paid back.
There is a way of taking the money out and not repaying it without attracting unwarranted attention provided it is set up properly in advance. I do rather suspect that it has been so set up.
So in the mean time have a consolation tangerine and a few hazel nuts plus a virtual Bellini for at least having a go
 8(0(*
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline misty

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #230 on: July 26, 2018, 10:09:00 PM »
That would work, it would need to be recorded but does not appear to be and would need to be paid back.
There is a way of taking the money out and not repaying it without attracting unwarranted attention provided it is set up properly in advance. I do rather suspect that it has been so set up.
So in the mean time have a consolation tangerine and a few hazel nuts plus a virtual Bellini for at least having a go
 8(0(*

I'd be interested to know how you think it could work in the absence of salaries & dividends. (Cheapskate  8(0(*)

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #231 on: July 26, 2018, 10:33:13 PM »
Kate has already done that
I mean what really really happened.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Angelo222

« Last Edit: July 26, 2018, 11:03:40 PM by Angelo222 »
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Erngath

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #233 on: July 27, 2018, 08:12:28 AM »
Didn't Sean ask his parents why they had hidden Maddie?

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/jul/08/son-claims-hid-madeleine-kate-mccann-court

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/10953524/Kate-McCann-my-son-asked-me-whether-we-hid-Maddies-body.html


 @)(++(*
So "questioning the whole sordid episode apparently" is actually S*** asking his mother about Amarals ridiculous "hiding the body theory" which he  had overhead in a news item four years ago.

Yes indeed S*** was questioning the whole sordid episode but it was Amarals sordid theory being questioned.
IMO your original post was at best unintentionally misleading, at worst quite intentional.
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #234 on: July 27, 2018, 08:28:43 AM »

Offline Sunny

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #235 on: July 27, 2018, 08:54:37 AM »
so nothing to do with the files,,.....just the boy saying...what is that nasty  man saying about you....thats that sorted

Have we sorted out your claim that CR worked Pro Bono for the McCanns yet.

That is the title of the topic and the reason I keep asking as you keep refusing to give a cite to that claim.  Just because the McCanns didn't have to pay because the papers caved in doesn't mean Carter Ruck worked pro bono.
Members are reminded that cites must be provided in accordance with the forum rules. On several occasions recently cites have been requested but never provided. Asking for a cite is not goading but compliance.

From this moment onward, posts making significant claims which are not backed up by a cite will be removed.

Moderators and Editors take note!

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #236 on: July 27, 2018, 09:21:51 AM »
Have we sorted out your claim that CR worked Pro Bono for the McCanns yet.

That is the title of the topic and the reason I keep asking as you keep refusing to give a cite to that claim.  Just because the McCanns didn't have to pay because the papers caved in doesn't mean Carter Ruck worked pro bono.

Yes we have...I've supplied the explanation and cites several times...Angelo and Brietta have also made reference to pro bono work.
« Last Edit: July 27, 2018, 05:31:33 PM by John »

Offline G-Unit

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #237 on: July 27, 2018, 09:23:57 AM »
Have we sorted out your claim that CR worked Pro Bono for the McCanns yet.

That is the title of the topic and the reason I keep asking as you keep refusing to give a cite to that claim.  Just because the McCanns didn't have to pay because the papers caved in doesn't mean Carter Ruck worked pro bono.

Pro bono means no-one pays. Both Carter-Ruck and the McCanns have referred to a CFA or no win no fee. None of them have suggested that Carter-Ruck worked pro bono.

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Sunny

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #238 on: July 27, 2018, 09:27:47 AM »
Pro bono means no-one pays. Both Carter-Ruck and the McCanns have referred to a CFA or no win no fee. None of them have suggested that Carter-Ruck worked pro bono.

So far we have given a poster cites for them working with a CFA and being on a retainer. Both of these would incur costs to the mcCanns should they lose. Other posters have been unable to provide cites that the agreement was pro bono despite many times of asking.
« Last Edit: July 27, 2018, 05:24:47 PM by slartibartfast »
Members are reminded that cites must be provided in accordance with the forum rules. On several occasions recently cites have been requested but never provided. Asking for a cite is not goading but compliance.

From this moment onward, posts making significant claims which are not backed up by a cite will be removed.

Moderators and Editors take note!

Offline barrier

Re: Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?
« Reply #239 on: July 27, 2018, 09:43:21 AM »
So far we have given a poster cites for them working with a CFA and being on a retainer. Both of these would incur costs to the mcCanns should they lose. Other posters have been unable to provide cites that the agreement was pro bono despite many times of asking.

Catching on. 8(>((
« Last Edit: July 27, 2018, 05:27:16 PM by slartibartfast »
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.