Pro bono or Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA)?

[Vertigo Swirl]

You seem to have a strange level of comprehension. Never mind, whatever make you happy.

No denial then.  OK.

[G-Unit]

Could we have a cite to support your claim...the judge listened to both sides....then asked them to go away and agree terms between themselves...

Imo...the express capitulated before the hearing and the deal was already done

Perhaps you could explain how the judge became involved?

[Miss Taken Identity]

No denial then.  OK.

Goading.... why do you invent your own version of what is being said- then twist it to ask questions and when no one answered to your satisfaction you answer it yourself and it shows your intended 'victim' n a bad way.

nasty IMO

Seriously John this is of no relevance other than to deflect from the thread and goad posters.

[Mr Gray]

Perhaps you could explain how the judge became involved?

I already have done...perhaps you should read the posts
An out of court settlement may or may not involve the court..
It may be enforced by a court order which would involve a court..I have already posted this and already posted a cite to support it

Now Angelo can provide the cite I have asked for

[Miss Taken Identity]

So far we have given a poster cites for them working with a CFA and being on a retainer. Both of these would incur costs to the mcCanns should they lose. Other posters have been unable to provide cites that the agreement was pro bono despite many times of asking.

Bump

This being the 18th page? still no reply. I think readers of this forum have got the jist of who is who and the supporters agenda. 

No cite will be forthcoming because there is none.

THE SUPPORTERS will play on words, thinking it makes them look clever, it only makes  a nonsense of the McCanns version of abduction claim.

[Mr Gray]

Bump

This being the 18th page? still no reply. I think readers of this forum have got the jist of who is who and the supporters agenda. 

No cite will be forthcoming because there is none.

THE SUPPORTERS will play on words, thinking it makes them look clever, it only makes  a nonsense of the McCanns version of abduction claim.

I think anyone who matters understands the McCann's are not suspects in either investigation...cites already provided..
You need to understand it matters not a jot what readers of this forum think.... absolutely nothing

[Alice Purjorick]

I think anyone who matters understands the McCann's are not suspects in either investigation...cites already provided..
You need to understand it matters not a jot what readers of this forum think.... absolutely nothing

That clarifies that then it has become an exercise in futility. Presumably you will not need assistance to find the exit considering by your own admission your talents are now surplus to requirements.......

[Miss Taken Identity]

I think anyone who matters understands the McCann's are not suspects in either investigation...cites already provided..
You need to understand it matters not a jot what readers of this forum think.... absolutely nothing

IN YOUR OPINION...  you begin this post with "I think anyone who matters understands"
 then you say "it matters not a jot what readers of this forum think.... absolutely nothing"

Confused  dot org 

Insulting readers who do not support the McCann... 

[Robittybob1]

IN YOUR OPINION...  you begin this post with "I think anyone who matters understands"
 then you say "it matters not a jot what readers of this forum think.... absolutely nothing"

Confused  dot org 

Insulting readers who do not support the McCann... 

clear as mud or confused, it depends on what you think.  Which didn't matter anyway.

[G-Unit]

I already have done...perhaps you should read the posts
An out of court settlement may or may not involve the court..
It may be enforced by a court order which would involve a court..I have already posted this and already posted a cite to support it

Now Angelo can provide the cite I have asked for

Was the court involved before agreement was reached?

[Mr Gray]

IN YOUR OPINION...  you begin this post with "I think anyone who matters understands"
 then you say "it matters not a jot what readers of this forum think.... absolutely nothing"

Confused  dot org 

Insulting readers who do not support the McCann... 

Note...I said it matters not a jot what readers of this forum think..nor posters...supporters or sceptics...perhaps you are under the misapprehension you are making a difference..

What matters is what the dual investigation think...and they have each told us the McCann's are not suspects

[Mr Gray]

Was the court involved before agreement was reached?

Imo yes...and Angelo is merely stating his opinion...not facts

[G-Unit]

Imo yes...and Angelo is merely stating his opinion...not facts

So how did the court become involved?

[Robittybob1]

Note...I said it matters not a jot what readers of this forum think..nor posters...supporters or sceptics...perhaps you are under the misapprehension you are making a difference..

What matters is what the dual investigation think...and they have each told us the McCann's are not suspects

You seem to be saying "what they say is what they think".  They may actually say something but think something else.  There is always going to be a degree of uncertainty.
Even if someone says "I think such and such" doesn't mean they are telling the truth either.

[Mr Gray]

So how did the court become involved?

I've answered this already...the out of court settlement may have been enforced by a court order