"Start by Asking Yourself What is a Supporter and Work on from There”

[G-Unit]

Still no condemnation of the points raised in my first post.
No more to be said!

Do you mean the unsubstantiated accusations made in your first post?

snip/
That ghastly site where they have taken a sweet photo of an innocent little girl and renamed it the "Lolitta" photo.
That ghastly site where they show sympathy for a known paedophile, because his name was linked at one time to Madeleine's disappearance
That ghastly site where they routinely accuse named people of being paedofiles.

Present your evidence and I will reply.

[Erngath]

Do you mean the unsubstantiated accusations made in your first post?

snip/
That ghastly site where they have taken a sweet photo of an innocent little girl and renamed it the "Lolitta" photo.
That ghastly site where they show sympathy for a known paedophile, because his name was linked at one time to Madeleine's disappearance
That ghastly site where they routinely accuse named people of being paedofiles.

Present your evidence and I will reply.

How utterly ridiculous.
You are a member there go and have a look.

[jassi]

How utterly ridiculous.
You are a member there go and have a look.

I think we need a little more than " go and see for yourself"  Hardly much of a cite.

[Erngath]

I think we need a little more than " go and see for yourself"  Hardly much of a cite.

We!! tough !
If you think for one moment that I will post a link to a photograph of a sweet little girl being labelled the Lollita photo, then think again.
I wouldn't bring trash like that to this form.

I don't believe John would appreciate a link being put on this forum which in my opinion is very libellous.
I don't care if you believe any of it or not.

[jassi]

Ah well, I'll just have to treat it as unsubstantiated hearsay.
Maybe Rob will have something to say - he seems red hot on cites.

[G-Unit]

Ah well, I'll just have to treat it as unsubstantiated hearsay.
Maybe Rob will have something to say - he seems red hot on cites.

Yes, just more rumours. Even if it's true it doesn't follow that every member past or present agrees with every word written on the forum. If that's so then it applies equally to members on stopthemyths where some very dodgy posts have been made.

I do hope Rob's desire for cites isn't becoming selective.

[Robittybob1]

The site deleted all his posts when he was convicted but Wayback shows he was there;

User avatar
Vee8
 
Posts: 1506
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 2:17 pm
Location: Suffolk
https://web.archive.org/web/20120507022617/http://stopthemyths.prophpbb.com:80/topic2937.html

http://www.ipswichstar.co.uk/news/ipswich-man-avoids-prison-after-downloading-over-40-000-indecent-images-of-children-1-5283183

It's general knowledge that Nessling was Vee8. just google.

Nessling, 59, now of Heron Close, Stowmarket, admitted three offences of making indecent images of children and possessing prohibited images of children.

Does that make him a paedophile? It sounds like it might be, but the crime was making and possessing prohibited images.

[jassi]

Nessling, 59, now of Heron Close, Stowmarket, admitted three offences of making indecent images of children and possessing prohibited images of children.

Does that make him a paedophile? It sounds like it might be, but the crime was making and possessing prohibited images.

What is a paedophile ?
There seems to be a wide range of behaviour that comes under that description, from kiddie-fiddling to collector of photographs. Public perception is very wide of the mark compared with legal definition.

[Alice Purjorick]

Nessling, 59, now of Heron Close, Stowmarket, admitted three offences of making indecent images of children and possessing prohibited images of children.

Does that make him a paedophile? It sounds like it might be, but the crime was making and possessing prohibited images.

That's a relief then. It could have been something serious.....

[Erngath]

Yes, just more rumours. Even if it's true it doesn't follow that every member past or present agrees with every word written on the forum. If that's so then it applies equally to members on stopthemyths where some very dodgy posts have been made.

I do hope Rob's desire for cites isn't becoming selective.

Of course it's true or do you believe I have invented the thread where the photo of a little girl is labelled the Lollita photograph.
Or do you believe I have invented the thread labelling a named person a paedophile.
It is true.
I most assuredly assumed you would not agree with this filth but I did assume you would condemn them.

[jassi]

It's not unknown for people on here to make things up, or give them an exaggerated twist, which is why cites are required to give credence to statements.

[Erngath]

It's not unknown for people on here to make things up, or give them an exaggerated twist, which is why cites are required to give credence to statements.

That may be something you would do but it's not the way I post.

[jassi]

That may be something you would do but it's not the way I post.

You are an anonymous poster on here whom I don't know from Adam, but by your own admission belong to at least one very unpleasant forum. How do I or other forum members know what you might be capable of?

[Erngath]

You are an anonymous poster on here whom I don't know from Adam, but by your own admission belong to at least one very unpleasant forum. How do I or other forum members know what you might be capable of?

Equally all that applies to you.
If you can suspect me of all this skullduggery, then really there is no point in continuing this debate.

[jassi]

Equally all that applies to you.
If you can suspect me of all this skullduggery, then really there is no point in continuing this debate.

I don't suspect you of anything but I do expect to back up your claims with evidence.