Lilly15 Reply #4177 on: November 07, 2018, 09:10:AM »
“Do you think the huge difference in treatment right from the start was intentional? Everyone else involved or known to Jodi seems to have been able to give various explanations for their actions and whereabouts even changing the info yet the same didnt apply to Luke.
Sandra Lean « Reply #4178 on: November 07, 2018, 06:09:PM »
“Without shadow of a doubt lilly15. What people don't realise is that the police were acting on wrong information from the off - for example, they believed Luke was coming up the path on his bike and that Jodi left her home with him at teatime.
Identical circumstances in both families were treated so differently - details about what people ate were treated as instantly suspicious in the Mitchell household, but not elsewhere, even when those details contradicted each other. 14 year old, heavily medicated Luke sleeping on one settee in the livingroom with his mother sleeping on a settee at the other side of the room was indicative of an "unnatural" relationship, but 19 year old Joseph sleeping in his mother's bedroom, wrapped in Jodi's duvet, at the foot of his mother's bed was accepted as perfectly natural. http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg448514.html#msg448514“
A high-profile trial heard bottles of urine were found in Mitchell's bedroom when it was searched in July 2003 and taken away by the police.
John Beckett QC, representing the Crown, told Lords Hamilton, Osborne and Kingarth: "His explanation was that because he slept on top of a bunk bed it was more convenient to do that than to do anything else.
"It was to show that explanation was untrue. The new ones (bottles) came at a time when his position was that he was sleeping in the living room next to his mother, or something like that." http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/edinburgh_and_east/7247137.stm“
What people don't realise is that the police were acting on wrong information from the off” People lie so it’s a given police would have been acting on wrong information from the off - part and parcel of the job.
Luke Mitchell’s house was searched days after the murder and bottles of his urine were found in his bedroom. More bottles of his urine were found when his house was searched the next time.
Luke Mitchell told police the reason for them finding the bottles of his urine was because he slept on top of a bunk bed it was more convenient to do that than to do anything else.
Sandra Lean “
even when those details contradicted each otherWhat is Sandra Leans reasoning about WHY Luke Mitchell lied to police about the urine bottles when she claims “
14 year old, heavily medicated Luke sleeping on one settee in the livingroom with his mother sleeping on a settee at the other side of the room And how does Sandra Lean come to the conclusion the police
believed Luke was coming up the path on his bike? What did Luke Mitchell tell police when he spoke to them on the night of the murder? What does his first statement say?
Did Luke Mitchell also tell police he
was coming up the path on his bike?
“
and that Jodi left her home with him at teatime” Where did this come from?