Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata

[Mr Gray]

It's a very interesting and informative article by David James Smith, reproduced on the Icke Forum. Here is a link to the original story in the Sunday Times;
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/its-official-there-was-no-child-abuse-in-jersey-5xcb0j2xd7b\

In your opinion... Do you believe everything you read in the papers.

[G-Unit]

In your opinion... Do you believe everything you read in the papers.

Have you read what he wrote? Do you dispute his account? In my opinion it's a balanced article which sets out the facts very well.

[barrier]

In your opinion... Do you believe everything you read in the papers.

I once read JFK was shot,so who knows.

[Brietta]

Corrie McKeague - vast swathes dug up - no body found.  Presumed dead, not by natural causes.

Ben Needham - vast swathes dug up - no body found.  Presumed dead, not by natural causes.

Both are named individuals who were reported missing in specific areas.

There are no missing persons recorded as being associated with Haute de la Garenne

[Brietta]

I'm trying to find out whether coconut shells have collagen in them.

"On March 14, the scientists told the police that there was not enough collagen to date the fragment; a week later they said there was enough after all. Collagen is only present in human bones — not in wood or coconut shells. Then another week later, they changed their minds again: there was probably no collagen after all. It was only in early April that the experts began to suggest it was probably — not definitely — not human after all. So far as Harper is concerned, that is still the position now. The suggestion was that it could be wood or a seed. The idea that it might be a fragment of coconut shell was a secondary opinion never given directly to the inquiry. The anthropologist who had originally thought it was a piece of a child’s skull re-examined it over April 8 and 9 and noted it had changed texture, weight and colour since she first saw it. Now she thought it might not be bone, though she too could not be certain. But by now it was established that the fragment, human or not, came from a pre-1940s/Victorian layer of the dig. They agreed to put it to one side and not waste further resources on more tests. It was no longer relevant."
from https://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=269527

As a puppy the first 'objet trouvé' my dog carried home was a coconut shell or I presume it was; it certainly made a more convincing looking 'skull' than JAR6 did.

[Mr Gray]

Have you read what he wrote? Do you dispute his account? In my opinion it's a balanced article which sets out the facts very well.

I had a quick look at saw some things that were not corroborated... He may have embellished his article... Will check later

[Mr Gray]

Have you read what he wrote? Do you dispute his account? In my opinion it's a balanced article which sets out the facts very well.

Have you read what he wrote... You think it's well balanced... Did you see this..


I have heard that Harper’s replacements have spoken cynically about the dog, implying that its handler, Martin Grime, fixes the dog’s demonstrations by priming it in advance with his own scent.

[G-Unit]

Have you read what he wrote... You think it's well balanced... Did you see this..


I have heard that Harper’s replacements have spoken cynically about the dog, implying that its handler, Martin Grime, fixes the dog’s demonstrations by priming it in advance with his own scent.

You will have noticed that Harper's replacements didn't exactly impress him either.

[Mr Gray]

You will have noticed that Harper's replacements didn't exactly impress him either.

are you not even a little shocked by the criticism of grime

[Mr Gray]

A short time later Mr Grime’s dog was
presented with the item and gave a positive indication for human
remains.


This is interestinhg and from tjhe BDO report. What its saying is that after recovering the coconut....it was presented to Eddie who alerted to it. So Edddie DID alert specifically  to the coconut...waht does thats say about eddies reliability. page 44 on the right side

https://www.gov.je/SiteCollectionDocuments/Government%20and%20administration/R%20Operation%20Rectangle%20review%20of%20the%20efficient%20and%20effective%20use%20of%20resources%20201005%20BDO%20Alto.pdf

[barrier]

I'm sure some one will provide a cite where a anthropologist or some one of that standing will confirm it was coconut for now lets let the anthropologist say what it might not be.

The anthropologist who had originally thought it was a piece of a child's skull re-examined it over April 8 and 9 and noted it had changed texture, weight and colour since she first saw it. Now she thought it might not be bone, though she too could not be certain.

[barrier]

are you not even a little shocked by the criticism of grime

Shocked by heresay,on here! seriously?

[Mr Gray]

I'm sure some one will provide a cite where a anthropologist or some one of that standing will confirm it was coconut for now lets let the anthropologist say what it might not be.

The anthropologist who had originally thought it was a piece of a child's skull re-examined it over April 8 and 9 and noted it had changed texture, weight and colour since she first saw it. Now she thought it might not be bone, though she too could not be certain.

i actually think its been proven not to be bone....Ill have a look

[G-Unit]

are you not even a little shocked by the criticism of grime

Given the way Harper's replacements bad mouthed their own colleagues., no. I don't even know what they mean.  I agree with David Janes Smith who found the goings-on by the authoities in Jersey pretty fishy. 

[Mr Gray]

Given the way Harper's replacements bad mouthed their own colleagues., no. I don't even know what they mean.  I agree with David Janes Smith who found the goings-on by the authoities in Jersey pretty fishy.

" bad mouthed their own colleagues"....what did they say that was not supported by evidence.   cite