Author Topic: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata  (Read 294546 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #1665 on: July 24, 2019, 08:26:45 AM »
The type of testing used in this case, low copy number (lcn), is as good as useless.  I spent a lot of time understanding lcn when I was on the Bamber case as it featured heavily at one of the appeal hearings.  The 3 appeal court judges ruled it as "utterly meaningless".  It will be a useful tool in some cases but in this case, as with Bamber, its impossible to rule out innocent contamination.  With lcn the 'human cellular material' ie source material is unknown eg saliva, blood, skin cells etc.  It works with samples invisible to the naked eye. 

I note many commentators such as Jim Gamble from CEOP explain the possibility of MM's DNA in the car from GM/KM but its just as likely it came from items MM had contact with which then contaminated other places she had the slightest contact with either directly or indirectly.  A reading, full or partial, can be picked up from some material as small as 1,000,000th the size of grain of salt  &%%6.

yet LCN DNA was used by the courts until there was a robust scientific challenge.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #1666 on: July 24, 2019, 08:53:04 AM »
You made a suggestion that grime could have made some arrangement with amaral ..it's probably still there
Someone thought I had said that but I hadn't at all.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #1667 on: July 24, 2019, 08:54:48 AM »
In Luz grime and Harrison talked of physical corroboration...now grime is talking about anecdotal witness statements....the goalposts have been moved
Did they know there were no anecdotal witnesses?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #1668 on: July 24, 2019, 08:55:18 AM »
yet LCN DNA was used by the courts until there was a robust scientific challenge.

Yes Omagh bombing I believe.  Maybe it could be used in some cases but certainly not Bamber or this case as victim LCN DNA would be all over the place from innocent contamination.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #1669 on: July 24, 2019, 08:56:18 AM »
Someone thought I had said that but I hadn't at all.

yes you did..

Well he could of course if Amaral had other intelligence indicating something happened behind the couch, and a bag was missing from the wardrobe and he had advised Grime of the theory.  When did Amaral first notice the bag was missing?

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=10341.msg547038#msg547038

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #1670 on: July 24, 2019, 09:05:03 AM »
yes you did..

Well he could of course if Amaral had other intelligence indicating something happened behind the couch, and a bag was missing from the wardrobe and he had advised Grime of the theory.  When did Amaral first notice the bag was missing?

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=10341.msg547038#msg547038
Davel:  "You made a suggestion that grime could have made some arrangement with amaral ..it's probably still there"
Robittybob1: "Well he could of course if Amaral had other intelligence indicating something happened behind the couch, and a bag was missing from the wardrobe and he had advised Grime of the theory.  When did Amaral first notice the bag was missing"

I honestly can't see how my statement means "that Grime could have made some arrangement with Amaral".

What do you mean by arrangement?  I'm suggesting Amaral may have outlined his theory to Grime.  Is that an arrangement?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #1671 on: July 24, 2019, 09:09:33 AM »
Davel:  "You made a suggestion that grime could have made some arrangement with amaral ..it's probably still there"
Robittybob1: "Well he could of course if Amaral had other intelligence indicating something happened behind the couch, and a bag was missing from the wardrobe and he had advised Grime of the theory.  When did Amaral first notice the bag was missing"

I honestly can't see how my statement means "that Grime could have made some arrangement with Amaral".

What do you mean by arrangement?  I'm suggesting Amaral may have outlined his theory to Grime.  Is that an arrangement?

you need to look at the context

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #1672 on: July 24, 2019, 09:11:41 AM »
you need to look at the context
I wrote the paragraph so I know the context. 
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #1673 on: July 24, 2019, 09:17:04 AM »
I wrote the paragraph so I know the context.

I agree arrangeemnt was the wrong word but....this was the calim billy made..



So let’s just get this clear you do not assert that Grime (possibly after discussing the case with Amaral) gave cues to the dogs to alert at certain locations connected to the McCann’s because he had ceased acting as a Policeman and was instead acting as a businessman concerned with personal financial gain?


thinking i had made your statement re amaral /grime...I didnt make the statement ..it was you

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #1674 on: July 24, 2019, 09:26:18 AM »
I have gone back to those posts
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=10341.msg547038#msg547038

Billy asked in his post "How would Grime know that there would be no transferable cadaver odour in 4G, for example... and how can he cue Keela to alert at the precise location in the hire car where human cellular material is found?"

I notice now that my reply did not refer to the actual site Billy was questioning. 
My reply "Well he could of course if Amaral had other intelligence indicating something happened behind the couch, and a bag was missing from the wardrobe and he had advised Grime of the theory.  When did Amaral first notice the bag was missing?"

I make no suggestions about Grime cuing Keela in the boot of the hire car.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #1675 on: July 24, 2019, 09:40:21 AM »
I have gone back to those posts
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=10341.msg547038#msg547038

Billy asked in his post "How would Grime know that there would be no transferable cadaver odour in 4G, for example... and how can he cue Keela to alert at the precise location in the hire car where human cellular material is found?"

I notice now that my reply did not refer to the actual site Billy was questioning. 
My reply "Well he could of course if Amaral had other intelligence indicating something happened behind the couch, and a bag was missing from the wardrobe and he had advised Grime of the theory.  When did Amaral first notice the bag was missing?"

I make no suggestions about Grime cuing Keela in the boot of the hire car.

Neither did I

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #1676 on: July 24, 2019, 09:44:11 AM »
Neither did I
You've lost me now.  You didn't and I didn't.  So what is the issue?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline barrier

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #1677 on: July 24, 2019, 09:50:38 AM »
I don't know, because I can't remember.

In most dog clips I have seen, the dog in operational deployment is rewarded immediately after the alert.

If you think it through, one cannot wait for an hour or two before humans manage to deny or confirm that the alert is correct.  The dog would not remember whether is was being denied a treat, or whether it got it right.

I don't know what happens in training.  Do the dogs get rewarded for alerting?  For not alerting?  For working diligently?  I don't know the answer.

There have been some I've seen on watching the Canadian border police at work,the dog is not rewarded until its been confirmed what it was in the package,once confirmed this was done by placing the package on the floor along with dummy packs and the dog alerts again getting a reward thus reinforcing its ongoing training.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #1678 on: July 24, 2019, 09:51:39 AM »
You've lost me now.  You didn't and I didn't.  So what is the issue?

It's not important

Offline G-Unit

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #1679 on: July 24, 2019, 10:15:51 AM »
You've lost me now.  You didn't and I didn't.  So what is the issue?

You both say you didn't and neither of you made clear unambiguous allegations. What you both did do imo was hint. One of you about possible collaberation between Amaral and Grine, the other about possible ulterior motives driving Grime.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0