Author Topic: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.  (Read 243432 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #195 on: November 27, 2018, 10:44:10 AM »
So are you assuming this whole story is true

I'm assuming that a 'family source' made observations which I found interesting;

A family source said: "Kate and Gerry have always maintained that their daughter was abducted and simply didn’t get up and wander off to her fate.

"To suggest this is almost ridiculous.

"There were heavy shutters which would have been impossible for a small child to open."
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #196 on: November 27, 2018, 11:06:37 AM »
I'm assuming that a 'family source' made observations which I found interesting;

A family source said: "Kate and Gerry have always maintained that their daughter was abducted and simply didn’t get up and wander off to her fate.

"To suggest this is almost ridiculous.

"There were heavy shutters which would have been impossible for a small child to open."
It seems that the McCanns are making the assumption that if Madeleine walked out she would have to lift the shutters first.  That to me is a ridiculous assumption.  To me the two situations are committed by separate people.
The person raising the shutter is a different person to Madeleine.  Why make one activity dependent on the other?
« Last Edit: November 27, 2018, 11:13:28 AM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Gertrude

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #197 on: November 27, 2018, 11:20:42 AM »
I'm assuming that a 'family source' made observations which I found interesting;

A family source said: "Kate and Gerry have always maintained that their daughter was abducted and simply didn’t get up and wander off to her fate.

"To suggest this is almost ridiculous.

"There were heavy shutters which would have been impossible for a small child to open."

   Almost ridiculous?    So not 'Ludicrous' or definitely ridiculous? 

Offline faithlilly

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #198 on: November 27, 2018, 11:39:24 AM »
So we were told back in May that the parents weren’t doing any interviews in case they have away details of the investigation......yet here we are 6 months later and what are they doing ?

Somehow I don’t think the parents and OG are best friends anymore.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline John

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #199 on: November 27, 2018, 11:40:46 AM »
It seems that the McCanns are making the assumption that if Madeleine walked out she would have to lift the shutters first.  That to me is a ridiculous assumption.  To me the two situations are committed by separate people.
The person raising the shutter is a different person to Madeleine.  Why make one activity dependent on the other?

At the end of the day we have to follow the evidence and ignore the fake science. Evidence is things like corroborated statements as to who was where and when, DNA, fingerprints, tracker dogs etc.  When we put these together I personally believe the woke and wandered theory rises to the surface above all others.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #200 on: November 27, 2018, 11:44:58 AM »
At the end of the day we have to follow the evidence and ignore the fake science. Evidence is things like corroborated statements as to who was where and when, DNA, fingerprints, tracker dogs etc.  When we put these together I personally believe the woke and wandered theory rises to the surface above all others.

And the open window and shutters ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Brietta

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #201 on: November 27, 2018, 11:51:28 AM »
What I can't understand is the both Gerry and Dianne also lift the shutters and yet their prints aren't located on the shutters either.
The fact that Dianne and Gerry are known to have handled the shutters from the outside could well be the reason there are no finger prints on the shutters.

There are fingerprints and smudges on the exterior of the shutter which can be clearly seen in the dragon blood left behind after the forensic examination.

What there isn't is a record of whether or not the outside of the window was dusted.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Lace

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #202 on: November 27, 2018, 11:53:12 AM »
And the open window and shutters ?


And the dog alerts?

Offline John

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #203 on: November 27, 2018, 11:57:28 AM »
And the open window and shutters ?

There is no proof they were open before 10pm.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #204 on: November 27, 2018, 12:03:01 PM »
There is no proof they were open before 10pm.

So the parents are lying ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #205 on: November 27, 2018, 12:34:32 PM »
So the parents are lying ?

Unless the McCann's are lying then there has to be an explanation for the shutter

Offline faithlilly

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #206 on: November 27, 2018, 12:45:33 PM »
Unless the McCann's are lying then there has to be an explanation for the shutter

Such as ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #207 on: November 27, 2018, 12:49:10 PM »
Such as ?

I dint believe  they are lying

Offline faithlilly

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #208 on: November 27, 2018, 12:54:05 PM »
I dint believe  they are lying

So what’s your solution to the open window problem ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #209 on: November 27, 2018, 12:58:21 PM »
So what’s your solution to the open window problem ?

There are several but I can't be bothered to share then.. I've had enough of pointless debate