The timeline revisited

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

Then you havent read my posts... I saying abduction is the most likely.. Not the only

Yes, sorry I know that you are prepared to accept there are other possibilities. I disagree that abduction is the “most likely” but we’ve had that debate already in this forum. Happy to go over it again if you want to though.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Abduction is one possible explanation.
I actually believe it’s “supporters” that refuse to accept that there are also other possibilities.

Can you let G-Unit explain why woke and wandered is plausible and logical but stranger abduction is not please?

[G-Unit]

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=10830.msg664203#msg664203

[misty]

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=10830.msg664203#msg664203

When an opportunist burglar enters a property he/she is looking for undetermined items of value which may or may not be present at that time.
When a child abductor enters a property he/she will already know that a child is in there if reconnaissance work has been undertaken.

[Vertigo Swirl]

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=10830.msg664203#msg664203

You have yet again failed to answer the question.  You seem to be suggesting that a stranger entering and leaving an unlocked premises and taking something without being detected is somehow not a logical or plausible occurrence, and yet it happens hundreds, possibly thousands of times a day worldwide, certainly far more frequently than little children waking up in the night and disappearing out the door never to be seen again.  So try again.  Why is the latter plausible and logical, but the former not?  Try and explain as best you can, I'm all ears.
Modify message

[Wonderfulspam]

The same way Murat was ruled out.  By virtue of the fact that there was a lack of any evidence of their involvement.

I don't remember SY ever saying Murat had been ruled out.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I don't remember SY ever saying Murat had been ruled out.

So Murat is still a suspect is he? 

[G-Unit]

When an opportunist burglar enters a property he/she is looking for undetermined items of value which may or may not be present at that time.
When a child abductor enters a property he/she will already know that a child is in there if reconnaissance work has been undertaken.

If.

[Eleanor]

Who would break into an appartment before 10pm unless he knew that the occupants were out?

[barrier]

Who would break into an appartment before 10pm unless he knew that the occupants were out?

Not knowing when they would be back too, massive risk with nothing much except a missing child to suggest it being so.

[Eleanor]

Not knowing when they would be back too, massive risk with nothing much except a missing child to suggest it being so.

That might depend on how long he had been watching them.

[barrier]

Who would break into an appartment before 10pm unless he knew that the occupants were out?

Interesting question which raises another imo, if doors are unlocked is it a breaking in, unlawful entry yes but breaking in, Mitchell on behalf of the McCann's stated the window was used for exit and they (abductor one presumes ) didn't have to tamper with anything.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Interesting question which raises another imo, if doors are unlocked is it a breaking in, unlawful entry yes but breaking in, Mitchell on behalf of the McCann's stated the window was used for exit and they (abductor one presumes ) didn't have to tamper with anything.

And what difference would that make in the grand scheme of things?

[barrier]

And what difference would that make in the grand scheme of things?

The same as any thing else said on this board yet you continue to engage.

[Vertigo Swirl]

The same as any thing else said on this board yet you continue to engage.

I meant what difference would it make to the case?  Whether it’s breaking in or unlawful entry?