The timeline revisited

[Mr Gray]

In an email from a certain Ms Brock, in the lab, she reports after initial tests to establish if carbon dating is possible; "the sample yielded 1.6% collagen"
https://voiceforprotest.blogspot.com/2010/03/jar6.html

Like I said though, this is a debate for elsewhere.

That is not an official source.. You've quoted it before.. Looks made up by some sceptic

[Eleanor]

You really do like to play around with words don't you.

No-one said it was "shameful using the UK dogs"- ONLY YOU.

You are deliberately falsifying the content of members posts in a way which I think is inherently dishonest.

You really must desist.

You are wasting your time with this.  Billy Whizz thinks that distorting words will suffice.  They won't, of course, but there you go.

Something very foolish has crept into this when some not so very bright persons think that they can abuse The English Language for whatever they think is pertinent.

This is never going to happen.

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

You really do like to play around with words don't you.

No-one said it was "shameful using the UK dogs"- ONLY YOU.

You are deliberately falsifying the content of members posts in a way which I think is inherently dishonest.

You really must desist.

It's not my fault that Dave's grammar was bad. He put a full stop after "shameful" which changes the perceived meaning of his post:

"The alerts by the dogs added absolutely nothing to the investigation.. It was shameful. Amaral and the PJ didn't understand"

Dave has very kindly clarified what he meant in a reasonable, rational manner,

[Mr Gray]

It's not my fault that Dave's grammar was bad. He put a full stop after "shameful" which changes the perceived meaning of his post:


Dave has very kindly clarified what he meant in a reasonable, rational manner,

Note.. My grammar isn't bad... It's a typo on my phone keyboard.

[Eleanor]

It's not my fault that Dave's grammar was bad. He put a full stop after "shameful" which changes the perceived meaning of his post:


Dave has very kindly clarified what he meant in a reasonable, rational manner,

We do not ever criticise the Grammar of another Member.  Please remember this.

Otherwise I might have a go at yours.

[Vertigo Swirl]

No, he realised the results were "inconclusive" in terms of cementing a case of parental involvement, despite his own views. He states clearly in The Truth of the Lie; "These conclusions do not, for the moment, constitute proof. If the laboratory results are positive, and only in that case, we will have our proof.

He asserted at the end of the book that Madeleine was dead.  How did he arrive at this conclusion?

“The conclusions my team and I have arrived at are the following:

1. The minor, Madeleine McCann died inside apartment 5A of the Ocean Club in Vila da Luz, on the night of May 3rd 2007;”

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

Note.. My grammar isn't bad... It's a typo on my phone keyboard.

No worries Dave.... but you can see how your post could be perceived differently because of the typo. There was no malicious intent to misrepresent you.

[Mr Gray]

Amaral understood the results of analysis on the evidence collected  were "inconclusive". He knew the evidence collected, never mind the alerts (to quote him), "do not, for the moment, constitute proof.". How is that understanding shameful?

You need to read the test of the rubbish he wrote... I've posted it many times

[Vertigo Swirl]

We do not ever criticise the Grammar of another Member.  Please remember this.

Otherwise I might have a go at yours.

I do.  Soz la.

[Brietta]

You are wasting your time with this.  Billy Whizz thinks that distorting words will suffice.  They won't, of course, but there you go.

Something very foolish has crept into this when some not so very bright persons think that they can abuse The English Language for whatever they think is pertinent.

This is never going to happen.

I don't think I have ever encountered such a prolonged or transparent misuse of the English Language. It isn't a trustworthy thing to do.

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

He asserted at the end of the book that Madeleine was dead.  How did he arrive at this conclusion?

“The conclusions my team and I have arrived at are the following:

1. The minor, Madeleine McCann died inside apartment 5A of the Ocean Club in Vila da Luz, on the night of May 3rd 2007;”

Yes I agree that was his conclusion, but he understood that the FSS report did not help cement this case.

[Mr Gray]

No, he realised the results were "inconclusive" in terms of cementing a case of parental involvement, despite his own views. He states clearly in The Truth of the Lie; "These conclusions do not, for the moment, constitute proof. If the laboratory results are positive, and only in that case, we will have our proof.

From then on, we are sure that, at a given moment, there was a body in apartment 5A. We now have to interview firemen, medical services personnel, previous tenants and employees of the Ocean Club to make sure that no death has taken place in this accommodation, which they confirm. So, we can conclude that the odour discovered is certainly that of Madeleine Beth McCann.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Yes I agree that was his conclusion, but he understood that the FSS report did not help cement this case.

How did he arrive at this conclusion then?

[Mr Gray]

Yes I agree that was his conclusion, but he understood that the FSS report did not help cement this case.

If you read his book he says the alerts confirm a body in the apt

[Vertigo Swirl]

How Billy can claim Amaral didn’t  draw from the alerts that a particular person is dead and that it was their corpse that was present at some point is quite beyond me!!!