Mark Redwine v 16 cadaver dogs

[ShiningInLuz]

you are no longer a mod...im replying to gunits posts and they are relevant to the redwine case

You're right, I'm not.  Otherwise 90% of the posts on here would have been deleted for deflection/disruption.

 

[ShiningInLuz]

a judge can tell a jry to ignore evidence if he thinks its inadmissible...if he chooses to do so

Inadmissible in law.  End of.

[Mr Gray]

If you have any connection to the Redwine case, this would be a good time to make your presentation.

It seems you only found out the details from a link I provided two days ago. There si nothing to discuss re the case yet...the alerts ahve been admitted a sevidence with Mary Cablk as expert witness for the defence. She has testified that in her opinion remnant scent will last only a week. There is no available evidence to prove her wrong

[Mr Gray]

Inadmissible in law.  End of.

so the judge can tell the jury to ignore evidence...give it up

[ShiningInLuz]

It seems you only found out the details from a link I provided two days ago. There si nothing to discuss re the case yet...the alerts ahve been admitted a sevidence with Mary Cablk as expert witness for the defence. She has testified that in her opinion remnant scent will last only a week. There is no available evidence to prove her wrong

She's entitled to her opinion.

It will be interesting to see if she is called to give testimony.

Check the links in this thread and you'll see I'm not working off a link to Mary Cablk.

Did you write to the defence attorneys as well as the judge?  Perhaps they may give credence to your ponderings.

[ShiningInLuz]

so the judge can tell the jury to ignore evidence...give it up

That which is inadmissible in law.  Do give it a rest.   

[Mr Gray]

She's entitled to her opinion.

It will be interesting to see if she is called to give testimony.

Check the links in this thread and you'll see I'm not working off a link to Mary Cablk.

Did you write to the defence attorneys as well as the judge?  Perhaps they may give credence to your ponderings.

I didnt write to anyone...i was giving a silly answer to a silly post..

I believe you have written to several people and tried to contact others...with your ponderings...and had no success

[Mr Gray]

That which is inadmissible in law.  Do give it a rest.   

so the judge can tell the jury to ignore evidence...fact...you claimed that statement was rubbish...now you try to wriggle out of your mistake

[G-Unit]

It's not a nice case, this. A thirteen year old boy should never have been forced by the ciourts to visit his father if he didn't want to imo. His request to be allowed to stay at a friend's house near his father;s house was refused too. He was picked up at the airport by his father and taken to his house via Wallmart and McDonalds. That evening he arranged (by text) to meet his friend at 6:30am the following morning. He didn't turn up and was never seen or heard from again.

He appears to have died from a fractured skull. It took a while to find this out  because the skull had been renoved from the body and it wasn't found for a while. The boy's blood was found in the house. The dogs alerted to the house and the bed of the father's truck.

I can understand the defence trying to discredit the dogs; it's their job. They also raised doubts about DNA testing. I find it distasteful for their arguments to be quoted in an attempt to discredit Grime's work in PdL. That's why I won't be posting on this topic again until the verdict is known.

[Mr Gray]

It's not a nice case, this. A thirteen year old boy should never have been forced by the ciourts to visit his father if he didn't want to imo. His request to be allowed to stay at a friend's house near his father;s house was refused too. He was picked up at the airport by his father and taken to his house via Wallmart and McDonalds. That evening he arranged (by text) to meet his friend at 6:30am the following morning. He didn't turn up and was never seen or heard from again.

He appears to have died from a fractured skull. It took a while to find this out  because the skull had been renoved from the body and it wasn't found for a while. The boy's blood was found in the house. The dogs alerted to the house and the bed of the father's truck.

I can understand the defence trying to discredit the dogs; it's their job. They also raised doubts about DNA testing. I find it distasteful for their arguments to be quoted in an attempt to discredit Grime's work in PdL. That's why I won't be posting on this topic again until the verdict is known.

Some of us simply believe in justice. Grime has never claimed the alerts had any evidential value in Luz... He never claimed the alerts were to cadaver odour... Theres nothing to discredit there.
Redwine might well be guilty and that's what the court will aim to find out. There's nothing wrong with questioning the validity of the alerts... That would be closed mindful... It's reasonable to question everything... That's being open minded

[ShiningInLuz]

It's not a nice case, this. A thirteen year old boy should never have been forced by the ciourts to visit his father if he didn't want to imo. His request to be allowed to stay at a friend's house near his father;s house was refused too. He was picked up at the airport by his father and taken to his house via Wallmart and McDonalds. That evening he arranged (by text) to meet his friend at 6:30am the following morning. He didn't turn up and was never seen or heard from again.

He appears to have died from a fractured skull. It took a while to find this out  because the skull had been renoved from the body and it wasn't found for a while. The boy's blood was found in the house. The dogs alerted to the house and the bed of the father's truck.

I can understand the defence trying to discredit the dogs; it's their job. They also raised doubts about DNA testing. I find it distasteful for their arguments to be quoted in an attempt to discredit Grime's work in PdL. That's why I won't be posting on this topic again until the verdict is known.

Whilst I understand your view, I consider it to be somewhat disappointing.

I started this thread to do no more than look at the Redwine case, with foresight, and as it may unfold, rather than haggling about dogs with hindsight.

I know that the thread has got bogged down in froth, smoke and mirrors.

But that is precisely why contributions are needed that cut through the cr*p.

There's a shovel and brush waiting for you if you decide to clear this BS.  We are the Illuminati.

[Mr Gray]

Whilst I understand your view, I consider it to be somewhat disappointing.

I started this thread to do no more than look at the Redwine case, with foresight, and as it may unfold, rather than haggling about dogs with hindsight.

I know that the thread has got bogged down in froth, smoke and mirrors.

But that is precisely why contributions are needed that cut through the cr*p.

There's a shovel and brush waiting for you if you decide to clear this BS.  We are the Illuminati.

so you started the thread to look at the Redwine case...this is the Madeleine Mccann board and is not the place to discuss random murder trials from around the world.
Is there something  re the Redwine case that is relevant to this board? if not your thread should be deleted.

Have a think a see if you can come up with a connection....

[ShiningInLuz]

so you started the thread to look at the Redwine case...this is the Madeleine Mccann board and is not the place to discuss random murder trials from around the world.
Is there something  re the Redwine case that is relevant to this board? if not your thread should be deleted.

Have a think a see if you can come up with a connection....

As the Redwine case was being peppered all over the board by posters such as you, I got p*ssed off trying to connect up random Redwine comments in threads that had nothing to do with Redwine.

Hence the thread.

Pretty simple.

[barrier]

As the Redwine case was being peppered all over the board by posters such as you, I got p*ssed off trying to connect up random Redwine comments in threads that had nothing to do with Redwine.

Hence the thread.

Pretty simple.

Yeah but yeah,can't get a dig in about Grime if thats the case.

[Mr Gray]

As the Redwine case was being peppered all over the board by posters such as you, I got p*ssed off trying to connect up random Redwine comments in threads that had nothing to do with Redwine.

Hence the thread.

Pretty simple.

why do you think the redwine case was being discussed.

You look as though you need some help. The connection between the Redwine case and the Mccann case is the cadaver dogs. The title of the thread you strated is  Mark Redwine v 16 cadaver dogs.

If you start a thread with cadaver dogs in the title dont be surprised if posters mention cadaver dogs. Without the dogs the case has no relevance and wouldnt even be discussed here.