Because it is obvious you changed it from Rebelo to Amaral. How simple and succinct does it need to be!
What nonsense. I have no idea why you have arrived at your conclusion and in my opinion is an illustration of precisely why this case is dogged with the level of superstition it suffers from.
In response to my post asking A.N Other ~ "Do you think the PJ didn't check on that? In my opinion not even Amaral in his book or documentary questioned the whooshing curtain, wonder why that was." you said ...
"It's in the files. Rebelo requested the weather records. There is nothing to suggest the PJ coughed up the €300+ to obtain the same."
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11155.msg567893#msg567893As you know, Amaral was sacked from the investigation on 02 October; the fax which was sent requesting the information about the weather on the 3rd/4th of May 2007 is dated 25 October 2007 which by my arithmetic is when Rebelo was playing catch up with the omissions of the Amaral regime.
I changed nothing in my post and I must still admit to puzzlement over your accusation that I did which I think is spurious to say the least. I
replied to your post and I take it my reply did not suit you, but that is no reason to misrepresent what I have actually said.
