Order of killings

[Holly Goodhead]

Then your opinion about the forensics and an over turned conviction is simply wishful thinking.

I believe new forensic tests on the blood/silencer will undermine it based on what has been achieved so far.

I've raised the fact a soc needs needs carrying out.  I've put forward my theories which are irrelevant unless they can be endorsed by those appropriately qualified.  As it stands a soc hasn't been carried out so of course people speculate about all sorts eg NB was shot in bedroom and NB wasn't shot in bedroom.  A mountain of data exists which I believe will conclude where NB was shot upstairs.

The blood/silencer requires private funding as only this is capable of a referral.  Once a referral is made JB becomes eligible for legal aid and other aspects can be pursued like soc reconstruction.

[Inspector Gadget]

Are there any men on here that think Jeremy is innocent? From what I’ve seen so far it’s mostly women that defend him. Just an observation so I am curious.

[Holly Goodhead]

Are there any men on here that think Jeremy is innocent? From what I’ve seen so far it’s mostly women that defend him. Just an observation so I am curious.

Do you think this forum is representative of all those who have an interest in the case?

If you go over to the IA forum (US domained) you will find all the male contributors believe SC responsible probably because they are all experienced with firearms.

[Inspector Gadget]

Any men here ?

[Holly Goodhead]

Any men here ?

What does it matter and how does anyone know who is behind the user names?

[Inspector Gadget]

 as I say, just curious... I’ve found that most defenders of JB to be women. Just wondered if there are any men on here who genuinely think he is innocent. Fascinating as to why it is mostly women who defend him despite a mountain of evidence.  So are there any men here ?

[Holly Goodhead]

as I say, just curious... I’ve found that most defenders of JB to be women. Just wondered if there are any men on here who genuinely think he is innocent. Fascinating as to why it is mostly women who defend him despite a mountain of evidence.  So are there any men here ?

I'm female and the only regular poster here who believes SC was responsible but as I said I don't believe this forum is representative of all views.

JB is supported by former Tory MP Andrew Hunter along with many other males eg his former QC Michael Turner:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/9716069/Devils-advocate-Michael-Turner-prepares-for-his-toughest-case.html

[Inspector Gadget]

I'm female and the only regular poster here who believes SC was responsible but as I said I don't believe this forum is representative of all views.

JB is supported by former Tory MP Andrew Hunter along with many other males eg his former QC Michael Turner:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/9716069/Devils-advocate-Michael-Turner-prepares-for-his-toughest-case.html

Thanks.

[steve_trousers]

Most of his celebrity supporters, whilst not wanting to lose face and backtrack, keep notably silent now. Certainly compared to their loud protests during the golden age of free Bamber.

I'm sure most of our womenfolk think Bamber is guilty, these days.

At Bamber’s trial, the jury were divided, and found the defendant guilty by a 10-2 majority. As sentence was passed, two female jurors wept.

[Inspector Gadget]

Most of his celebrity supporters, whilst not wanting to lose face and backtrack, keep notably silent now. Certainly compared to their loud protests during the golden age of free Bamber.

I'm sure most of our womenfolk think Bamber is guilty, these days.

Wondering if he looked like he did now, would half of these women had supported him!

[Holly Goodhead]

Most of his celebrity supporters, whilst not wanting to lose face and backtrack, keep notably silent now. Certainly compared to their loud protests during the golden age of free Bamber.

I'm sure most of our womenfolk think Bamber is guilty, these days.

Celebrity supporters?

[Holly Goodhead]

Wondering if he looked like he did now, would half of these women had supported him!

I think you will find looks are subjective and in the eye of the beholder.

People are passionate and campaign about all sorts of issues eg Greta Thunberg re climate change nothing to do with looks.

[steve_trousers]

Celebrity supporters?

whatever they are, well known people. The noise is much decreased now.

The irony didn't escape me when even Bob Woffenden changed his mind. He was heavily involved in the James Hanratty alleged miscarriage of justice and campaigned for over a decade to have the victims underwear DNA tested. When the DNA proved Hanratty was the killer Woffenden cried contamination and refused to back down. Even though there was a 1 in 2.5 million chance it wasn't Hanratty. Contamination.

[Inspector Gadget]

I think you will find looks are subjective and in the eye of the beholder.

People are passionate and campaign about all sorts of issues eg Greta Thunberg re climate change nothing to do with looks.

She is a child and that is bordering on  abuse what her parents have done but that’s another topic lol. But back on point, it’s not a coincidence that Bamber was good looking and yet all you can find online and on forums are women that defend him. Just an observation and one that ,unfortunately, you can’t disprove (as you said, you’re the only vocal JB defender here and you’re not a man). I think his looks played a massive part in his defence demographic. Reminds me of Bundy in that sense.

[Holly Goodhead]

whatever they are, well known people. The noise is much decreased now.

The irony didn't escape me when even Bob Woffenden changed his mind. He was heavily involved in the James Hanratty alleged miscarriage of justice and campaigned for over a decade to have the victims underwear DNA tested. When the DNA proved Hanratty was the killer Woffenden cried contamination and refused to back down. Even though there was a 1 in 2.5 million chance it wasn't Hanratty. Contamination.

The late Bob Woffenden is not a celebrity.  I doubt anyone has heard of him outside his circle.  In any event I don't see what makes his views any more or less valid than anyone who posts here?  He was not a expert in any relevant field.