I prefer not to argue, thank you. I will only say that you gave no 'concrete' reasons for your assumptions and I'm entitled to do the same in my reply. That's as far as this conversation needed to go imo.
The point is that you are a member of a discussion forum and I am also a member of that same discussion forum.
Presently we are having a discussion regarding "Maddie cops seek yet more cash".
You responded to my post.
And I responded to yours, ending by saying "You seem to be firm in your opinion of what isn't going on in their investigation. Wonder if you would care to share with other members what your concrete reasons for that might be".
https://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11267.msg702305#msg702305You have chosen not to answer that question ~ as is your right although ~ giving you a perfect platform for expressing your firmly held opinions and explaining the reasons behind them and why you hold them.
Just a tad of inconsistency there concerning your reluctance to reply with -imo- your aggressive expectation of receiving response from other members.
Not agreeing with your opinion particularly when you refuse to defend it is hardly "arguing" although I think it could be classed as being rather revealing ;)