Maddie cops seek yet more cash

[Brietta]

Any investigation of the McCanns, by The MET, would be illegal though, wouldn't it?  My thanks to davel.

As the self confessed WUM of the forum I rarely acknowledge your posts but I think it is worth the while to rectify one of your many mythconceptions which are so blatantly obvious to the majority and go a long way to cancelling the problem some have of realising why a predatory paedophile familiar with the Algarve and Luz is the current focus of police interest and has been for some time.

Snip
GERRY AND KATE MCCANN
Why the success of the investigation in the Madeleine case is mainly due to the parents
09.06.2020,
It was the parents of the missing three-year-old Madeleine McCann who fought all these years for clarification. In doing so, they themselves repeatedly got into the vísier of conspiracy theorists. What did all this do to them?
By Cornelia Fuchs
https://www.stern.de/gesellschaft/maddie-mccann--warum-der-ermittlungserfolg-vor-allem-den-eltern-zu-verdanken-ist-9293010.html

[Wonderfulspam]

As the self confessed WUM of the forum I rarely acknowledge your posts but I think it is worth the while to rectify one of your many mythconceptions which are so blatantly obvious to the majority and go a long way to cancelling the problem some have of realising why a predatory paedophile familiar with the Algarve and Luz is the current focus of police interest and has been for some time.

Snip
GERRY AND KATE MCCANN
Why the success of the investigation in the Madeleine case is mainly due to the parents
09.06.2020,
It was the parents of the missing three-year-old Madeleine McCann who fought all these years for clarification. In doing so, they themselves repeatedly got into the vísier of conspiracy theorists. What did all this do to them?
By Cornelia Fuchs
https://www.stern.de/gesellschaft/maddie-mccann--warum-der-ermittlungserfolg-vor-allem-den-eltern-zu-verdanken-ist-9293010.html

The case against the new prime suspect is dead, Brietta. There's sod all evidence against him, with the exception of his bogus confessions.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I think there are a lot of assumptions being made. Perhaps your concrete reasons for your opinions could be shared?

Have SY confirmed publicly that CB is their prime suspect? What have they said they suspect him of doing?

We don't know how or whether CB figures in the Met's investigation.  He may do, he may not, until then any opinion pro or anti is a complete guess.  Best wait and see, eh?

[Brietta]

I think there are a lot of assumptions being made. Perhaps your concrete reasons for your opinions could be shared?

Have SY confirmed publicly that CB is their prime suspect? What have they said they suspect him of doing?

You do make such silly non sequiturs; of course "there are a lot of assumptions being made".  And your opinionated posts support many assumptions ~ what a pity you always appear so reluctant to justify them all though.

Could make for ephemeral reading in which nothing is ever really backed up or substantiated.  Uninformed opinions really counts for little.  I think the word I'm looking for is vacuous.

By the way the normal form is that if you want to ask me a question, you get an answer once you have answered what I have asked you first.  You are not of course required to answer and neither am I ~ unfortunately observation reveals you really never do.  Not conducive either to debate or to substantiating unsubstantiated opinion.

[Wonderfulspam]

We don't know how or whether CB figures in the Met's investigation.  He may do, he may not, until then any opinion pro or anti is a complete guess.  Best wait and see, eh?

You're going to be waiting a long time.

[Brietta]

We don't know how or whether CB figures in the Met's investigation.  He may do, he may not, until then any opinion pro or anti is a complete guess.  Best wait and see, eh?

Scotland Yard are telling nobody nothing at this very active and critical stage of proceedings in Madeleine's case.

That is precisely as it should be.

[Wonderfulspam]

Scotland Yard are telling nobody nothing at this very active and critical stage of proceedings in Madeleine's case.

That is precisely as it should be.

What is this critical stage of proceedings you're imagining?

[G-Unit]

You do make such silly non sequiturs; of course "there are a lot of assumptions being made".  And your opinionated posts support many assumptions ~ what a pity you always appear so reluctant to justify them all though.

Could make for ephemeral reading in which nothing is ever really backed up or substantiated.  Uninformed opinions really counts for little.  I think the word I'm looking for is vacuous.

By the way the normal form is that if you want to ask me a question, you get an answer once you have answered what I have asked you first.  You are not of course required to answer and neither am I ~ unfortunately observation reveals you really never do.  Not conducive either to debate or to substantiating unsubstantiated opinion.

I prefer not to argue, thank you. I will only say that you gave no 'concrete' reasons for your assumptions and I'm entitled to do the same in my reply. That's as far as this conversation needed to go imo.

[G-Unit]

We don't know how or whether CB figures in the Met's investigation.  He may do, he may not, until then any opinion pro or anti is a complete guess.  Best wait and see, eh?

Well they've never endorsed Wolter's frank disclosures, that's for sure. They have said only that they are investigating a missing person, not a murder.

[Brietta]

I prefer not to argue, thank you. I will only say that you gave no 'concrete' reasons for your assumptions and I'm entitled to do the same in my reply. That's as far as this conversation needed to go imo.

The point is that you are a member of a discussion forum and I am also a member of that same discussion forum.

Presently we are having a discussion regarding "Maddie cops seek yet more cash".

You responded to my post.

And I responded to yours, ending by saying "You seem to be firm in your opinion of what isn't going on in their investigation.  Wonder if you would care to share with other members what your concrete reasons for that might be".
https://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11267.msg702305#msg702305

You have chosen not to answer that question ~ as is your right although ~ giving you a perfect platform for expressing your firmly held opinions and explaining the reasons behind them and why you hold them.

Just a tad of inconsistency there concerning your reluctance to reply with -imo- your aggressive expectation of receiving response from other members.

Not agreeing with your opinion particularly when you refuse to defend it is hardly "arguing" although I think it could be classed as being rather revealing ;)

[Brietta]

Well they've never endorsed Wolter's frank disclosures, that's for sure. They have said only that they are investigating a missing person, not a murder.

I don't recall Scotland Yard "endorsing" anything much about anything regarding Madeleine's case of late.  But the mere fact that they are seeking more money to continue working on her behalf would seem to endorse their continued interest.

Snip
On the evening Maddie disappeared, the suspect is also said to have received a phone call on +351 912 730 680 with a Portuguese country code. "Investigators believe that the person who made this call is a highly important witness and are calling on them to get in touch," the Scotland Yard statement said. The caller's number is +351 916 510 683.

The BKA is leading the investigation against the 43-year-old in cooperation with the Metropolitan Police in Great Britain and the police in Portugal. The public prosecutor's office in Braunschweig is responsible for the case because the man had his last residence there before his stay abroad.
https://www.welt.de/vermischtes/article208887171/Maddie-McCann-Mordermittlungen-gegen-43-jaehrigen-Deutschen.html

[Vertigo Swirl]

Well they've never endorsed Wolter's frank disclosures, that's for sure. They have said only that they are investigating a missing person, not a murder.

Do you take any comfort from this?

[Eleanor]

Has anyone asked of what evidence The PJ have got?  They must have something.

[G-Unit]

Has anyone asked of what evidence The PJ have got?  They must have something.

The Germans have named CB as the abductor and murderer of Madeleine McCann in Portugal?

[Eleanor]

The Germans have named CB as the abductor and murderer of Madeleine McCann in Portugal?

That won't do, will it.  The PJ need evidence to make Brueckner an Arguido.