Maddie cops seek yet more cash

[G-Unit]

Well there isn't any evidence against the McCann's as they are innocent.

That sounds logical, but it isn't. Innocent people have been arrested, tried and sent to prison. I expect there was evidence involved in those cases.

[Wonderfulspam]

Smith was not sure it was Gerry he saw.  The end.

But he was more certain than not that it was Gerry he saw.

[Wonderfulspam]

Nonsence, that wasn't a sighting.  Gerry was carrying his son as any caring parent would carry their sleeping child down aircraft steps

No evidence there .... Soz, WS

You are desperate aen't you?   I wonder why?

I'm sorry? What am I desperate for exactly?

[Mr Gray]

That sounds logical, but it isn't. Innocent people have been arrested, tried and sent to prison. I expect there was evidence involved in those cases.

Do you accept CB may be guilty

[G-Unit]

Do you accept CB may be guilty

Of course I do. The evidence that has been shared hasn't convinced me that he is guilty though.

[Wonderfulspam]

Of course I do. The evidence that has been shared hasn't convinced me that he is guilty though.

Ahhh, but YOU don't know what evidence Wolters has!
You're quite welcome to suggest what evidence he could have though.
Please do, because I'm not getting many takers on that matter.

[barrier]

Of course I do. The evidence that has been shared hasn't convinced me that he is guilty though.

Evidence or information ?

[Mr Gray]

Of course I do. The evidence that has been shared hasn't convinced me that he is guilty though.

So you accept that amaral could be wrong...grime and his dogs could be wrong..and the mccanns could be right in claiming abduction by a paedophile..
Good to hear

[G-Unit]

So you accept that amaral could be wrong...grime and his dogs could be wrong..and the mccanns could be right in claiming abduction by a paedophile..
Good to hear

There isn't enough evidence imo to decide what happened on 3rd May 2007.

I didn't know the McCanns claimed abduction by a paedophile? I thought they only claimed abduction as a certainty.

[G-Unit]

Evidence or information ?

There's a lot of information, speculation and assumptions and not a lot of evidence, to be honest.

[Mr Gray]

There isn't enough evidence imo to decide what happened on 3rd May 2007.

I didn't know the McCanns claimed abduction by a paedophile? I thought they only claimed abduction as a certainty.

You are wriggling...if CB is guilty which you accept as a possibility ..then amaral is wrong and you also accept grime and his dogs could be an absolute joke..lol

[Wonderfulspam]

You are wriggling...if CB is guilty which you accept as a possibility ..then amaral is wrong and you also accept grime and his dogs could be an absolute joke..lol

Yes, & Wolters can prove Amaral was wrong, can't he. Only, he won't be proving that anytime this year, but you can always hope for next I suppose. Good luck with that.

[Mr Gray]

There isn't enough evidence imo to decide what happened on 3rd May 2007.

I didn't know the McCanns claimed abduction by a paedophile? I thought they only claimed abduction as a certainty.

According to Wolters who has seen all the evidence...there is.

[Wonderfulspam]

According to Wolters who has seen all the evidence...there is.

Wolters says this, Wolters says that. You just have to believe Wolters, is all.

[Vertigo Swirl]

There isn't enough evidence imo to decide what happened on 3rd May 2007.

I didn't know the McCanns claimed abduction by a paedophile? I thought they only claimed abduction as a certainty.

Once you accept that the McCanns didn't play a part in their child's disappearance (and by using logic it's pretty obviously the only conclusion one can draw IMO) then IMO it becomes obvious that Madeleine was abducted from the apartment.