Author Topic: Paedophiles in Parliament  (Read 76349 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #75 on: May 05, 2020, 11:16:27 PM »
Just over 9 minutes in and it's starting to sound loopy but I will persevere.

It is interesting and the pizza code email sounding convincing, however, leaping from that to suggesting that everyone who knew Epstein and visited his Island must be a paedo, that the elite all belong to satanic cults and take part in cannibalism - is just a step too far.

The triangle symbol may be used by paedo's but it is a pretty simple shape and it's not surprising that the same shape is used by others, they don't have to be paedo's - look at the images in this link, the woman in the video would no doubt suggest that they portray paedophillia and satanism. Do they or do you just see what you want to see - has she brainwashed herself into seeing paedo's around every corner?

https://fineartamerica.com/shop/canvas+prints/triangle+symbolism

There is no doubt governments try to control and manipulate - few would argue with that but most of the stuff referring to the CIA comes from the Cold War era when everyone was trying to manipulate everyone else. Paedo's exists, of course they do, but I don't believe it's an elite club straight out of Rosemary's Baby.

Offline Caroline

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #76 on: May 05, 2020, 11:17:31 PM »
It's a SLOG.

But basically.......a very hot stuntman breaks his back and goes a bit mental.

The End.

 @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(*

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #77 on: May 05, 2020, 11:23:18 PM »
OK, OK, I understand.

It's similar to a book, you need an introduction then later in the movie comes the reveal and how it's done.

I've been researching these things for many years and until I can get your attention away from the mainstream narrative it will be difficult for me to introduce a new theory that would not be ridiculed.

If you want to go and just listen to liz crokin at the end, she's brilliant. Go for it.

Catch you soon.

Thank you Pug x

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #78 on: May 05, 2020, 11:42:22 PM »
It is interesting and the pizza code email sounding convincing, however, leaping from that to suggesting that everyone who knew Epstein and visited his Island must be a paedo, that the elite all belong to satanic cults and take part in cannibalism - is just a step too far.

The triangle symbol may be used by paedo's but it is a pretty simple shape and it's not surprising that the same shape is used by others, they don't have to be paedo's - look at the images in this link, the woman in the video would no doubt suggest that they portray paedophillia and satanism. Do they or do you just see what you want to see - has she brainwashed herself into seeing paedo's around every corner?

https://fineartamerica.com/shop/canvas+prints/triangle+symbolism

There is no doubt governments try to control and manipulate - few would argue with that but most of the stuff referring to the CIA comes from the Cold War era when everyone was trying to manipulate everyone else. Paedo's exists, of course they do, but I don't believe it's an elite club straight out of Rosemary's Baby.



Fair comments... I'm with you all the way.

This is a massive step one takes and to believe it is very difficult because it is 'quite unbelieveable'.  But it's true.

Not everyone is involved in this, that's not suggested, but many are and it's the likes of the MSM who have been told to suffocate the story, denounce such claims, only have people on the show who will say what we want them to say. 

Then we have the Bamber case. Imagine if this case was not what we are being told.  It's the media's job to slate Jeremy at every opportunity, that's part of the plan I want to discuss.

The jourors had to be convinced this man commuted the crime.  A young good looking man, well educated, well spoken and charming... Jeez, no juror would find this beautiful creature guilty, so, they had to demonize him.

He was greedy.. A playboy. A thief. A drug user. A womaniser. A liar.  A psychopath.  He was grandiose, lazy, evil, he even tried selling naked photos of his sister. 
And then, he even phoned his girlfriend to say this was the night that he was planning on killing his entire family.  On top of that, he laughed at the funeral, he even went on holiday... This man never cared about anybody... He is evil to the core!

What if that information is distorted, and its not the whole truth?  Would you guys on here believe it?  No, you wouldn't.

But the movie shows how we are manipulated. How if I pull up a video of Sonia Poulton you will immediately slap her down and slander her.... Because that's what they want you to do.

I think you get the just of it here.

All I'm asking is, please, have an open mind and let's try and debate this. 

I do not want to convince you he's innocent.  I don't - I promise.
What I want is for you to tell me, with an open mind, where I am wrong.

I will begin my theory tomorrow.  All I ask is you walk with me. Don't attack me, please.

Thanks you 🙏

Offline Caroline

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #79 on: May 06, 2020, 12:53:45 AM »


Fair comments... I'm with you all the way.

This is a massive step one takes and to believe it is very difficult because it is 'quite unbelieveable'.  But it's true.

Not everyone is involved in this, that's not suggested, but many are and it's the likes of the MSM who have been told to suffocate the story, denounce such claims, only have people on the show who will say what we want them to say. 

Then we have the Bamber case. Imagine if this case was not what we are being told.  It's the media's job to slate Jeremy at every opportunity, that's part of the plan I want to discuss.

The jourors had to be convinced this man commuted the crime.  A young good looking man, well educated, well spoken and charming... Jeez, no juror would find this beautiful creature guilty, so, they had to demonize him.

He was greedy.. A playboy. A thief. A drug user. A womaniser. A liar.  A psychopath.  He was grandiose, lazy, evil, he even tried selling naked photos of his sister. 
And then, he even phoned his girlfriend to say this was the night that he was planning on killing his entire family.  On top of that, he laughed at the funeral, he even went on holiday... This man never cared about anybody... He is evil to the core!

What if that information is distorted, and its not the whole truth?  Would you guys on here believe it?  No, you wouldn't.

But the movie shows how we are manipulated. How if I pull up a video of Sonia Poulton you will immediately slap her down and slander her.... Because that's what they want you to do.

I think you get the just of it here.

All I'm asking is, please, have an open mind and let's try and debate this. 

I do not want to convince you he's innocent.  I don't - I promise.
What I want is for you to tell me, with an open mind, where I am wrong.

I will begin my theory tomorrow.  All I ask is you walk with me. Don't attack me, please.

Thanks you 🙏

You're entitled to to have your theory and believe that Bamber is innocent. Certainly no attacks from me!  Look forward to reading your thoughts tomorrow  8((()*/

Just one thing - should what Bamber looked like have influenced the jury (or anyone) " no juror would find this beautiful creature guilty" - your comment kind of suggests it should?

Anyway, night AA x

Offline Myster

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #80 on: May 06, 2020, 07:03:37 AM »
It's a SLOG.

But basically.......a very hot stuntman breaks his back and goes a bit mental.

The End.
I see abs is back in business... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKhqEF6NsqE
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #81 on: May 06, 2020, 08:13:04 AM »
You're entitled to to have your theory and believe that Bamber is innocent. Certainly no attacks from me!  Look forward to reading your thoughts tomorrow  8((()*/

Just one thing - should what Bamber looked like have influenced the jury (or anyone) " no juror would find this beautiful creature guilty" - your comment kind of suggests it should?

Anyway, night AA x


I agree, but there must be no room left for hesitation.   It came in at 10:2, if just one juror had been taken in by his positive looks etc, then he'd be free.

Looks shouldnt count, but personality can.

They who planned this, had to ensure there were no mistakes.  He was portrayed as evil.

My view, not reading into all the hype about his bad behaviour etc, I never fed into it all, has resulted in me finding him kind, considerate, supportive, loyal,  he's a joker, friendly and knowledgeable.  He's positive in company and makes every effort to ensure your time with him is special. Of me, he asked for nothing but me myself. 

Offline Myster

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #82 on: May 06, 2020, 08:21:13 AM »
You've been admiring Dr. Jekyll and refusing to countenance Mr. Hyde.
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline APRIL

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #83 on: May 06, 2020, 08:25:03 AM »

I agree, but there must be no room left for hesitation.   It came in at 10:2, if just one juror had been taken in by his positive looks etc, then he'd be free.

Looks shouldnt count, but personality can.

They who planned this, had to ensure there were no mistakes.  He was portrayed as evil.

My view, not reading into all the hype about his bad behaviour etc, I never fed into it all, has resulted in me finding him kind, considerate, supportive, loyal,  he's a joker, friendly and knowledgeable.  He's positive in company and makes every effort to ensure your time with him is special. Of me, he asked for nothing but me myself.


Good Morning, Auntie A. The 'Jeremy' you came to know, in prison, appears to be rather different from the 'Jeremy' others experienced him as being. "Kind and considerate etc" are not how he has been described by those in his company when he was free. As I feel perfectly certain that he never saw you as being any sort of threat, you may have seen a side of him reserved for very few.

Offline APRIL

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #84 on: May 06, 2020, 08:37:21 AM »
You've been admiring Dr. Jekyll and refusing to countenance Mr. Hyde.


Anke Chen gets me every time. Thank-you. 8((()*/

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #85 on: May 06, 2020, 08:38:58 AM »

I agree, but there must be no room left for hesitation.   It came in at 10:2, if just one juror had been taken in by his positive looks etc, then he'd be free.

Looks shouldnt count, but personality can.

They who planned this, had to ensure there were no mistakes.  He was portrayed as evil.

My view, not reading into all the hype about his bad behaviour etc, I never fed into it all, has resulted in me finding him kind, considerate, supportive, loyal,  he's a joker, friendly and knowledgeable.  He's positive in company and makes every effort to ensure your time with him is special. Of me, he asked for nothing but me myself.

Bamber cheated on JM with AG

He cheated on you with newly acquainted ‘other people’

These actions are not kind or considerate and show he’s not loyal

Covering his cell and himself in his own faeces was not kind or considerate AA

He never supported you AA - he dumped you and left you to face the abuse and whatever else alone

How many times has he contacted you to check to make sure you’re okay, do you need anything, etc ?

There are so many more other examples
« Last Edit: May 06, 2020, 09:04:44 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Eleanor

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #86 on: May 06, 2020, 08:39:54 AM »

Watched It.  Still thinking about It.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #87 on: May 06, 2020, 08:51:37 AM »

I agree, but there must be no room left for hesitation.   It came in at 10:2, if just one juror had been taken in by his positive looks etc, then he'd be free.

Looks shouldnt count, but personality can.

They who planned this, had to ensure there were no mistakes.  He was portrayed as evil.

My view, not reading into all the hype about his bad behaviour etc, I never fed into it all, has resulted in me finding him kind, considerate, supportive, loyal,  he's a joker, friendly and knowledgeable.  He's positive in company and makes every effort to ensure your time with him is special. Of me, he asked for nothing but me myself.

What makes you believe psychopaths aren’t like this Aunt Agatha?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #88 on: May 06, 2020, 08:53:14 AM »

Good Morning, Auntie A. The 'Jeremy' you came to know, in prison, appears to be rather different from the 'Jeremy' others experienced him as being. "Kind and considerate etc" are not how he has been described by those in his company when he was free. As I feel perfectly certain that he never saw you as being any sort of threat, you may have seen a side of him reserved for very few.

Bamber mirrored Aunt Agatha


Individuals with psychopathic or narcissistic traits* frequently use false personas to interact with others, sometimes tailoring their masks so that they appear to share the interests of their targets. From small talk to bombastic speeches, any spotlight presents the opportunity to craft a mask, and to test, dominate, or even malign unwitting interlocutors.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/brainstorm/201712/5-things-psychopaths-and-narcissists-will-do-in-conversation


’Psychopaths in particular are glib, and mendacity is their lingua franca’
« Last Edit: May 06, 2020, 09:00:08 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #89 on: May 06, 2020, 09:08:28 AM »
I've been researching these things for many years and until I can get your attention away from the mainstream narrative it will be difficult for me to introduce a new theory that would not be ridiculed.

You’ve been groomed and conned AA

Your denial is understandable

Your ‘research’ appears part of your ‘distractive or escapist’ strategy

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/09/29/the_odd_body_denial/

"From a psychoanalytical viewpoint, denial is a pathological, ineffective defense mechanism..On the other hand, according to the stress and coping model, denial can be seen as an adaptive strategy to protect against overwhelming events and feelings."
« Last Edit: May 06, 2020, 09:15:00 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation