Author Topic: Paedophiles in Parliament  (Read 76375 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #120 on: May 06, 2020, 12:08:47 PM »
And Prof Egan is a psychologist

I'm not sure why his early diagnosis is being ignored - it's completely ridiculous!

Offline Caroline

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #121 on: May 06, 2020, 12:10:37 PM »
Yes, the jury got bored of all the evidence and decided the case on whether he was good looking or not.

They were split 9-2 until the undecided juror was persuaded by the 9 that his monobrow was a sure sign of guilt.

Sorry, but I did laugh at this  @)(++(*

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #122 on: May 06, 2020, 12:11:30 PM »
He was classified as  such prior to trial by a real life psychiatrist.

Is this the "real life" psychiatrist you refer to?  Do you have evidence that the psychiatrist actually met JB to carry out a diagnosis?
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #123 on: May 06, 2020, 12:12:14 PM »
And Prof Egan was/is a psychologist

And 27 alleged annual prison assessments haven’t erased the psychiatrists pre trial assessment of Bamber
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Caroline

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #124 on: May 06, 2020, 12:15:10 PM »
Is this the "real life" psychiatrist you refer to?  Do you have evidence that the psychiatrist actually met JB to carry out a diagnosis?

Of course he met him, he was hired by the defence - do you think he was asked to give his opinion from his own house? That's just silly Holly. I used to believe the hype about how he didn't meet Bamber but that isn't common sense. The report was clearly withheld by the defence and I think Bamber should campaign for that to be released also - it's only fair!

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #125 on: May 06, 2020, 12:15:59 PM »
Is this the "real life" psychiatrist you refer to?  Do you have evidence that the psychiatrist actually met JB to carry out a diagnosis?

“the psychiatrist gathered up his papers”

Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #126 on: May 06, 2020, 12:17:29 PM »
Of course he met him, he was hired by the defence - do you think he was asked to give his opinion from his own house? That's just silly Holly. I used to believe the hype about how he didn't meet Bamber but that isn't common sense. The report was clearly withheld by the defence and I think Bamber should campaign for that to be released also - it's only fair!

Bamber’s innocence fraud campaign should seize until he releases his pre trial assessment report
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #127 on: May 06, 2020, 12:19:15 PM »
I'm not sure why his early diagnosis is being ignored - it's completely ridiculous!

Why does it appear Mark Newby is also ignoring it; or is he ?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #128 on: May 06, 2020, 12:20:56 PM »
Has AA got a firearms license? Does she know they have to be kept locked in a secure cabinet?

Something or someone appears to have ‘put the frighteners’ on her or she wouldn’t have handed it in during the alleged ‘gun amnesty’ ?

So I handed it in to my local police station. No questions asked.  It was handed in during one of the gun amnesty around 2009

What year was this ‘gun amnesty’ ?

Would there be records of it ?

What police force was it ?

How did Aunt Agatha hear of the alleged ‘gun amnesty’ ?
« Last Edit: May 06, 2020, 12:28:02 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #129 on: May 06, 2020, 12:24:32 PM »
Bamber’s innocence fraud campaign should seize until he releases his pre trial assessment report

Why didn’t this happen around the time Simon Hall confessed and exposed his guilt in 2013 ?

Has Aunt Agatha ever had sight of Bamber’s pre trial assessment ?

Have his CT ?

Trudi Benjamin ?
« Last Edit: May 06, 2020, 12:26:33 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #130 on: May 06, 2020, 12:31:37 PM »
From what AA said  previously, the rifle he gave her was a pellet gun (air rifle) and although they aren't toys, they aren't typically lethal. Bamber must have been told by EP that they were finished with the  items in question and asked him where/who he wanted them returned to. I know Spy thinks the police don't do that but they do.

Why wasn’t it disposed of though Caroline? Why was it given to Aunt Agatha and why did she accept it into her home?

And what type of person would give a mum with young twin sons a rifle of any description ?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #131 on: May 06, 2020, 01:28:26 PM »
“the psychiatrist gathered up his papers”

In counsel's Chambers.  JB was on remand.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #132 on: May 06, 2020, 01:40:16 PM »
Of course he met him, he was hired by the defence - do you think he was asked to give his opinion from his own house? That's just silly Holly. I used to believe the hype about how he didn't meet Bamber but that isn't common sense. The report was clearly withheld by the defence and I think Bamber should campaign for that to be released also - it's only fair!

Where's the evidence the psychiatrist met JB?  He visited cousels Chambers and may well have been the defence psychiatrist, Dr Bradley, who was instructed to give evidence about SC.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #133 on: May 06, 2020, 02:02:36 PM »
In counsel's Chambers.  JB was on remand.

When do think a pre trial assessment takes place Holly?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #134 on: May 06, 2020, 02:04:27 PM »
Where's the evidence the psychiatrist met JB?

Maybe Bamber told Aunt Agatha - someone will know - You could always ask Bamber directly

Simon Halls pre trial assessment concluded a dissocial personality

Dissocial personality disorder is one of ten personality disorders defined in the ICD-10 classification system. It is called [ censored word]ocial personality disorder in the DSM-IV and DSM-5 classification systems and is still sometimes referred to as such by professionals in the UK

“Psychopathy is considered to be a considerably severe form of dissocial personality disorder

https://patient.info/doctor/dissocial-personality-disorder

Maybe Bamber’s says the same or similar?

« Last Edit: May 06, 2020, 02:09:05 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation