Thoughts On The Case

[Nicholas]

One of them is lying...that’s for sure.

I cannot question JM, but I could certainly question Jeremy and I did....consistently!

I’m of the opinion he IS NOT lying...os therefore, it must be Julie.

And no, I would not waste my time on reading through her statements again, she is a liar and we’re not talking once or twice here....once she started it was lie upon lie upon lie.....

That’s why a legal letter was sent to Jeremy to back off from requesting a lie detector. He was threatened.

We’ll leave it there.

And you don’t have,to believe me, I do not have that letter in my possession and never did.

Do you know what brainwashing is AA ?

You wouldn’t be wasting your time reading Julie’s statements as they are her words

[Aunt Agatha]

You weren’t ‘protected’ you said you had to go to the police twice

Bamber had the choice to say he didn’t want to be your sons godfather - would suggest that was a mutual choice AA - not yours alone

The police had nothing to do with Jeremy whatsoever.

I foolishly unmasked myself and was attacked.  I went to the police, twice. End of!

[Nicholas]

The police had nothing to do with Jeremy whatsoever.

I foolishly unmasked myself and was attacked.  I went to the police, twice. End of!

What do you mean you ‘foolishly unmasked yourself twice’ ?

[Nicholas]

The police had nothing to do with Jeremy whatsoever.

I foolishly unmasked myself and was attacked.  I went to the police, twice. End of!

You obviously went to the police for a reason

But it seems they did nothing so maybe nothing happened to you ?

[Nicholas]

One of them is lying...that’s for sure.

I cannot question JM, but I could certainly question Jeremy and I did....consistently!

I’m of the opinion he IS NOT lying...os therefore, it must be Julie.

If you had viewed this case objectively then you would have also considered what Julie had said was true and that Bamber was lying

Instead you’ve decided to only see things from the viewpoint that Bamber wasn’t lying

[Nicholas]

That’s why a legal letter was sent to Jeremy to back off from requesting a lie detector. He was threatened.

By who ?

Do you make things up AA?

[Nicholas]

I foolishly unmasked myself and was attacked.

Do you mean you told strangers your name and that you were Bamber’s girlfriend ?

[Nicholas]

Enjoy while you can 

What’s do you find funny about grooming AA ?

[Nicholas]

As for godfather, my choice. Not his.

Do you think it was a wise choice to make Bamber your sons godfather ?

If you died would it have meant he then looks after your boys?

[Nicholas]

Groomed is definitely the wrong word here Nicholas.

I was not his lawyer, he didn’t try to persuade me in any way whatsoever regarding my thinking over the case.  He didn’t need to.  I had the paperwork, as little as it was then, and that’s all we both had.

There was no room for ‘grooming’....

What’s having the paperwork got to do with it?

[Nicholas]

The police had nothing to do with Jeremy whatsoever.

I foolishly unmasked myself and was attacked.  I went to the police, twice. End of!

You’ve claimed you were ‘attacked’ because of Bamber and ‘other women‘- think you refer to them as bamberettes

I suspect the police did have something to do with Bamber because his name would have been brought up by you when you contacted them - twice

This would then have been passed on to prison security - well it should have been - regardless, I suspect your reports to the police were Bamber related and as such you would have provided the police with yet more evidence of his gaslighting

Doesn’t your insight suggest this to you AA ?

[Aunt Agatha]

You’ve claimed you were ‘attacked’ because of Bamber and ‘other women‘- think you refer to them as bamberettes

I suspect the police did have something to do with Bamber because his name would have been brought up by you when you contacted them - twice

This would then have been passed on to prison security - well it should have been - regardless, I suspect your reports to the police were Bamber related and as such you would have provided the police with yet more evidence of his gaslighting

Doesn’t your insight suggest this to you AA ?

I’ve answered more than enough questions Nicholas. No more.  Believe what you want.  I’m not interested.

[Nicholas]

I’ve answered more than enough questions Nicholas.

You’ve answered very few questions AA

[Nicholas]

This was agreed.  Bamber and his team have been aware of this from the beginning, as was I.

You weren’t around in ‘the beginning’ Aunt Agatha

If, as you claim, Julie Mugford was allegedly offered a new identity - why does it appear she didn’t take up the offer ?

[Nicholas]

If JM were charged with any criminal offences how long would she have had a criminal record for Aunt Agatha?

Could you rephrase the question please by elaborating further.

If JM had been charged with and found guilty of cheque fraud for example, what would her punishment have been and how long would it have remained on her record ?