Thoughts On The Case

[Nicholas]

A deal with the NOW only upon him being found guilty.

New identity to a country of her choosing.

A clear criminal record.

A new life.....thats just for starters!

What ‘crimes’ are you claiming Bamber told you JM committed ?

[Nicholas]

All I’m saying is, she would not got away with it today,

What are you claiming she ‘got away with’ ?

[Nicholas]

I’ve answered more than enough questions Nicholas. No more.  Believe what you want.  I’m not interested.

Your posts suggest you are, especially the ones to Ispywithmybigeye

Have you had the Cartier watch looked over and been told it’s a fake AA ?

[John]

It is disappointing to note that despite numerous warnings, some members continue to use crude and totally uncalled-for language when responding to other members. This will no longer be allowed to continue.

I have instructed the moderation team to clamp down heavily on rule breakers from now on.

There will be no exceptions!

[Nicholas]

That’s why a legal letter was sent to Jeremy to back off from requesting a lie detector. He was threatened.

We’ll leave it there.

And you don’t have,to believe me, I do not have that letter in my possession and never did.

I don’t believe Bamber was ‘threatened’ as you’ve claimed AA and there’s no evidence to suggest such a letter existed

If this were true, Bamber & his current solicitor or CT would back up your claims

Maybe they should be asked

[Aunt Agatha]

I’ve told you I cannot prove this as I have no paperwork.

Dismiss it if you wish but you’re wasting time bringing this subject up as it was approached many, many years ago.

[Nicholas]

I’ve told you I cannot prove this as I have no paperwork.

Dismiss it if you wish but you’re wasting time bringing this subject up as it was approached many, many years ago.

You brought the subject up AA - here

That’s why a legal letter was sent to Jeremy to back off from requesting a lie detector. He was threatened.

We’ll leave it there.

And you don’t have,to believe me, I do not have that letter in my possession and never did.

And you didn’t say you ‘cannot prove this as I have no paperwork’ what you said was

‘I do not have that letter in my possession and never did’

[Nicholas]

I’ve told you I cannot prove this as I have no paperwork.

Dismiss it if you wish but you’re wasting time bringing this subject up as it was approached many, many years ago.

Am not sure if you are implying Bamber received a threatening letter and told you about it or something else?

You’ve made claim

‘That’s why a legal letter was sent to Jeremy to back off from requesting a lie detector. He was threatened’


By who was he allegedly threatened ?

[Nicholas]

‘That’s why a legal letter was sent to Jeremy to back off from requesting a lie detector. He was threatened’

If Bamber received a ‘legal letter’ as you claim AA ‘threatening him’ surely he or his campaign team would have publicised it ?

Why are you only mentioning this now?

[Aunt Agatha]

If Bamber received a ‘legal letter’ as you claim AA ‘threatening him’ surely he or his campaign team would have publicised it ?

Why are you only mentioning this now?

I’m fed up of you going on about it, it’s pathetic, stating you know everything.  That old chestnut has passed.

[Nicholas]

How many ‘deals’ did Bamber have set up at the time?

We know of the one with the Sun through his then girlfriend Anji Greaves; she was sat waiting in a hotel with a journalist

Eric Allison claimed in 2011

‘Bamber is clever and strategic. He has courted a number of news organisations over the years. He divides the evidence he has gathered and packages "exclusives" to different newspapers.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/feb/10/jeremy-bamber-innocent-of-murder-appeal


There don’t appear to be many news organisations left who are willing to report on BamBer’s BS

[Nicholas]

I’m fed up of you going on about it, it’s pathetic, stating you know everything.  That old chestnut has passed.

You brought it up AA

But why have you brought it up now?

If Bamber received a ‘legal letter’ as you claim AA ‘threatening him’ surely he or his campaign team would have publicised it ?

I don’t recall ever hearing this before ?

[Nicholas]

I’m fed up of you going on about it, it’s pathetic, stating you know everything.  That old chestnut has passed.

I’ve no idea what you’re referring to 

[Nicholas]

I’m fed up of you going on about it, it’s pathetic, stating you know everything.  That old chestnut has passed.

You stated

That’s why a legal letter was sent to Jeremy to back off from requesting a lie detector. He was threatened.

We’ll leave it there.

And you don’t have,to believe me, I do not have that letter in my possession and never did.

Have you made this up Aunt Agatha ?

The only time I’m aware of JM having made any public comment on the case since Bamber was found guilty was around the time of his appeal in 2002 and recently when she allegedly said she’s not been approached by producers of ITV’s WHF

She allegedly said earlier this year,

“I haven’t participated at all in the show or seen it.

“I haven’t spoken to the actress who is playing me and don’t know her.

“I doubt I will have access to it over here so I don’t think I will be watching it.”

And around the time of his appeal 2001/02 JM allegedly stated,

 “As far as I am concerned nothing has changed - I sincerely believe he is guilty. Do I stand by my original story? Yes, absolutely. I always assumed he would be in jail for life.”

https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/5264307/woman-whose-evidence-helped-nail-killer-jeremy-bamber-has-been-found-living-in-canada/

[ISpyWithMyEye]

The officer responsible for removing the rifle from SC's body and making it safe was A/PS Woodcock who was firearms trained.

If the relatives connected the blood/paint why would a firearms officer not do the same with an absence of blood on the thread protector and/or around the muzzle in general?

Yes I am confident with the new forensic tests.

The officer who bagged and sealed the gun didn’t study it in detail: that wasn’t his job — that was for forensics. He wasn’t looking  for traces of dried blood on the muzzle, and obviously didn’t even take notice of the fact the thread protector wasn’t on the rifle.

He was in a house with five dead bodies who’d all been brutally shot dead, and in which one of the young victims was so terribly injured when shot in the face that even the police have refused to let people see the horrendous trauma: that officer must have felt sickened to the core being surrounded by such horrendous sights...and you’re saying he would have noticed a small little thing like the thread protector not being on the end of the rifle? He never mentioned the lack of blood on the barrel, either, did he? Which proves he didn’t study them as he had no need to.

You’re just trying to create yet another boring conspiracy — and so far none of your conspiracies have washed. JB is STILL imprisoned and has failed EVERY attempt at trying to worm his way out.

As you’re confident with this NEW “new fresh” evidence, why are you so desperate to have a reconstruction carried out? You do realise the court would ignore such rubbish, don’t you? Ask Pete, your husband who you claim is an ex-lawyer...😌 What did Pete specialise in?