ASK; JEREMY BAMBER

[Nicholas]

Not In his cell he didn't. He had to go and look at them. They were not available to him 24/7.

Why not in his cell ?

Where did he have to go and look at them ?

Why weren’t they available to him 24/7 ?

[Aunt Agatha]

Why not in his cell ?

Where did he have to go and look at them ?

Why weren’t they available to him 24/7 ?

I didn't question it...it seemed normal.

When I read years later how he had so much paperwork in his cell, I knew then that things had changed.

[sika]

You don't need to, I trust what you say.

I think it's about time he gave a no barrs hold interview.. By his oposers.

The supporters are satisfied therefore the CT cannot do, without bias, what we have suggested he do here.

It's you who he needs to convince of his innocence and correct any inconsistencies within the case.

If he says no, I'll be extremely disappointed in him, however, it may be the fact that it's me calling him to do it.  The CT would def refuse me lol.

He's spent 30 odd years attempting to do this, failing spectacularly.  Over this time, he has inadvertently strengthened the case against him. He has picked which aspects of the case to contend and they have all been convincingly rebuffed.  Therefore, I can't see him being receptive to awkward questions that he can't possibly answer, without dropping himself right in it. 

[Aunt Agatha]

He's spent 30 odd years attempting to do this, failing spectacularly.  Over this time, he has inadvertently strengthened the case against him. He has picked which aspects of the case to contend and they have all been convincingly rebuffed.  Therefore, I can't see him being receptive to awkward questions that he can't possibly answer, without dropping himself right in it.

Thank you Sika, you are correct on every point and I agree with you on every point.

However, this is were I believe we should move on.

Jeremy has been protected by the Campaign Team, a very good move on his behalf.  Nothing much gets past them and they will try and do what they feel is right and access to him is only sometimes through them.

All his supporters belive Jeremy and the CT and of course do not question it or the dynamics.

Time has moved on, he is still in prison. It has not worked!

Here, with about 4000 members, far outweighing the CT website, we have both supporters and opposers, those inbetween and those just passing by without a single interest in the case.

The attention that Jeremy could garner form this website is huge.  Where these interested parties then go, on what side they stand, is a chance that Jeremy has to take.  He has nothing to lose!!

I believe Jeremy will tell you the truth and I continue to support him until I see evidence that brings that loyalty into question.

I firmly believe, that Jeremy needs to answer all these non-answered questions, he needs to bring light where there is dark confusion and he needs to hear what you people are saying...without it being censored.  His replies will not be censored either.

Is it a trial by forum?  I don't know.  But I do believe he stands a better chance of garnering supporters on here with his own beliefs and opinions of what happened that fateful night, rather than hiding behind the CT who are doing feck all IMHO.   

trudy whatshername is a complete disgrace.  How can she destroy Jeremys chances the way she has?  Why is she a speaker on behalf of the CT when her talks have been described by journalists  as both boring and monolithic.  She reads from a script that lacks passion and belief. 

Jeremy could do better speaking up for himself...but the CT will want to control everything and I certainly would not let that happen if he came here.

He will be asking the question, 'Can I trust (AA) her?' 

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Thank you Sika, you are correct on every point and I agree with you on every point.

However, this is were I believe we should move on.

Jeremy has been protected by the Campaign Team, a very good move on his behalf.  Nothing much gets past them and they will try and do what they feel is right and access to him is only sometimes through them.

All his supporters belive Jeremy and the CT and of course do not question it or the dynamics.

Time has moved on, he is still in prison. It has not worked!

Here, with about 4000 members, far outweighing the CT website, we have both supporters and opposers, those inbetween and those just passing by without a single interest in the case.

The attention that Jeremy could garner form this website is huge.  Where these interested parties then go, on what side they stand, is a chance that Jeremy has to take.  He has nothing to lose!!

I believe Jeremy will tell you the truth and I continue to support him until I see evidence that brings that loyalty into question.

I firmly believe, that Jeremy needs to answer all these non-answered questions, he needs to bring light where there is dark confusion and he needs to hear what you people are saying...without it being censored.  His replies will not be censored either.

Is it a trial by forum?  I don't know.  But I do believe he stands a better chance of garnering supporters on here with his own beliefs and opinions of what happened that fateful night, rather than hiding behind the CT who are doing feck all IMHO.   

trudy whatshername is a complete disgrace.  How can she destroy Jeremys chances the way she has?  Why is she a speaker on behalf of the CT when her talks have been described by journalists  as both boring and monolithic.  She reads from a script that lacks passion and belief. 

Jeremy could do better speaking up for himself...but the CT will want to control everything and I certainly would not let that happen if he came here.

He will be asking the question, 'Can I trust (AA) her?'

Ag, do you think it’s possible that the campaign team have ulterior motives?

Could they deliberately be posting  his logs, reading out his letters by his parents graveside etc, albeit with him wanting that, knowing people would find it disgraceful ?

Could they be deliberately showing this side to him in order to keep the campaign team running ? They must make some money out of it for expenses etc...if he was ever freed they’d lose their “fag money” and notoriety they seem to crave

[Aunt Agatha]

Ag, do you think it’s possible that the campaign team have ulterior motives?

Could they deliberately be posting  his logs, reading out his letters by his parents graveside etc, albeit with him wanting that, knowing people would find it disgraceful ?

Could they be deliberately showing this side to him in order to keep the campaign team running ? They must make some money out of it for expenses etc...if he was ever freed they’d lose their “fag money” and notoriety they seem to crave

I'd be lying if I said it has not crossed my mind.

[Caroline]

Ag, do you think it’s possible that the campaign team have ulterior motives?

Could they deliberately be posting  his logs, reading out his letters by his parents graveside etc, albeit with him wanting that, knowing people would find it disgraceful ?

Could they be deliberately showing this side to him in order to keep the campaign team running ? They must make some money out of it for expenses etc...if he was ever freed they’d lose their “fag money” and notoriety they seem to crave

It's a business.

[Aunt Agatha]

Is this how he normally is then AA ?

No its not. He's normally very direct, focused and can usually see the bigger picture.  What I have seen put out by the campaign team is not Jeremy, unless they instruct him to be like that.  I want him to talk to you as he would speak to Mike, Daisy or anybody else who writes to him.

That's what I mean by no flannel.

[Aunt Agatha]

Why?

Because they could pay for the photocopies and post. Not Bamber.

[Daisy]

Hi Aunt Agatha please can you ask Jeremy if it is true a member of the jury fell asleep during the trial.

[Aunt Agatha]

Hi Aunt Agatha please can you ask Jeremy if it is true a member of the jury fell asleep during the trial.

I certainly can Daisy.

I'm still awaiting a reply.

He's certainly not jumping to bite my hand off is he?

[Caroline]

No its not. He's normally very direct, focused and can usually see the bigger picture.  What I have seen put out by the campaign team is not Jeremy, unless they instruct him to be like that.  I want him to talk to you as he would speak to Mike, Daisy or anybody else who writes to him.

That's what I mean by no flannel.

I thought you hadn't had contact with him for years?

[Aunt Agatha]

I thought you hadn't had contact with him for years?

Do you think that could be the delay in replying?

He's trying to figure if he can trust me or not!

But as I say, we have nothing to lose - even if he doesn't reply.

[Caroline]

Do you think that could be the delay in replying?

He's trying to figure if he can trust me or not!

But as I say, we have nothing to lose - even if he doesn't reply.

Delay? It's only been a few days and the post is a bit slow at present.

[Aunt Agatha]

Delay? It's only been a few days and the post is a bit slow at present.

It's all email Caroline.  He could respond within 24hrs if necessary.