New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Brietta]

I would rather hear it for myself.


Well that does surprise me the number of snips you put from copy/paste B

Too bad my use of 'Snips' may be causing you some annoyance.  What would astound me is if you ever bothered to read them 👀

Like the member I was addressing in my post, I too am a stickler for "Accept nothing ~ Believe no-one ~ Confirm everything"

Which is why I will not take anything Saunokonoko says without hearing it in context.  He tends to use pod casts quite extensively in his work ... I doubt if he is shy about this one.

[Mr Gray]

If that tweet is correct, the phone ping has been narrowed down to an unidentified mast in PdL, with an unknown coverage area. Maybe that's why he can't 100% confirm that his suspect was definitely in PdL.

You are making assumptions. Breukner may have not been told exactly where the mast is or its range but the Germans may well have that info. He may have been told the approximate location of the phone but he doesn't wish to share that information

[kizzy]

Too bad my use of 'Snips' may be causing you some annoyance.  What would astound me is if you ever bothered to read them 👀

Like the member I was addressing in my post, I too am a stickler for "Accept nothing ~ Believe no-one ~ Confirm everything"

Which is why I will not take anything Saunokonoko says without hearing it in context.  He tends to use pod casts quite extensively in his work ... I doubt if he is shy about this one.

It's not that I don't bother to read them, it's just your stance is the opposite to mine.

There are quite a few snips from just media coverage, what would be impossible for you to check out if you don't mind me saying

So is that you will accept I have and believe I have because I have confirmed I do read your posts B

[Brietta]

It's not that I don't bother to read them, it's just your stance is the opposite to mine.

There are quite a few snips from just media coverage, what would be impossible for you to check out if you don't mind me saying

So is that you will accept I have and believe I have because I have confirmed I do read your posts B

Thank you, Kizzy.

[Vertigo Swirl]

How can I give you a link to a telephone conversation? Saunokonoko's word is as good as that of all the other journalists who've been asserting all sorts of uncheckable things.

Aha!  The. we don’t know if he said wouldn’t or couldn’t and only have a Sceptic hero’s word for it what he did actually say about any of it.  Say no more!

[G-Unit]

Aha!  The. we don’t know if he said wouldn’t or couldn’t and only have a Sceptic hero’s word for it what he did actually say about any of it.  Say no more!

If you go back to the early days, the police never said he was in PdL; its the media who changed the narrative from him being in the area to him being lurking outside 5A.

[pathfinder73]

Too bad my use of 'Snips' may be causing you some annoyance.  What would astound me is if you ever bothered to read them 👀

Like the member I was addressing in my post, I too am a stickler for "Accept nothing ~ Believe no-one ~ Confirm everything"

Which is why I will not take anything Saunokonoko says without hearing it in context.  He tends to use pod casts quite extensively in his work ... I doubt if he is shy about this one.

I too am a stickler for "Accept nothing ~ Believe no-one ~ Confirm everything"

That's why the PJ wanted to do a reconstruction with the witnesses.

[Eleanor]

I too am a stickler for "Accept nothing ~ Believe no-one ~ Confirm everything"

That's why the PJ wanted to do a reconstruction with the witnesses.

So why did Amaral refuse to do a reconstruction?

[Mr Gray]

If you go back to the early days, the police never said he was in PdL; its the media who changed the narrative from him being in the area to him being lurking outside 5A.

In the early days as I rememeber his phone placed him near 5a...why  did his phone appear on the radar if it wasnt picked by a mast

[Vertigo Swirl]

If you go back to the early days, the police never said he was in PdL; its the media who changed the narrative from him being in the area to him being lurking outside 5A.

Wrong.  HCW himself said he was outside the Apartment block on that 60 Minutes Doc.

[G-Unit]

Wrong.  HCW himself said he was outside the Apartment block on that 60 Minutes Doc.

This is the wording of the official appeal;

 he almost certainly used the Portuguese mobile phone number + 351 912 730 680 in
the time period in question. On 03/05/2007, there was a phone call with a so far unidentified person in the area of Praia da Luz at the material time. The conversation partner used the Portuguese
phone number + 351 916 510 683. The user of this number is considered an important witness, but
was not staying in the area at the time of the call.
https://www.bka.de/DE/IhreSicherheit/Fahndungen/Personen/BekanntePersonen/43_Jaehriger_Deutscher_TV/Sachverhalt.html?nn=26874#detailinformationen132470

[Vertigo Swirl]

This is the wording of the official appeal;

 he almost certainly used the Portuguese mobile phone number + 351 912 730 680 in
the time period in question. On 03/05/2007, there was a phone call with a so far unidentified person in the area of Praia da Luz at the material time. The conversation partner used the Portuguese
phone number + 351 916 510 683. The user of this number is considered an important witness, but
was not staying in the area at the time of the call.
https://www.bka.de/DE/IhreSicherheit/Fahndungen/Personen/BekanntePersonen/43_Jaehriger_Deutscher_TV/Sachverhalt.html?nn=26874#detailinformationen132470

That’s as maybe, did you watch the 60 Minutes documentary?

[G-Unit]

That’s as maybe, did you watch the 60 Minutes documentary?

Have you got a link?

[Eleanor]

This is the wording of the official appeal;

 he almost certainly used the Portuguese mobile phone number + 351 912 730 680 in
the time period in question. On 03/05/2007, there was a phone call with a so far unidentified person in the area of Praia da Luz at the material time. The conversation partner used the Portuguese
phone number + 351 916 510 683. The user of this number is considered an important witness, but
was not staying in the area at the time of the call.
https://www.bka.de/DE/IhreSicherheit/Fahndungen/Personen/BekanntePersonen/43_Jaehriger_Deutscher_TV/Sachverhalt.html?nn=26874#detailinformationen132470

I can't open this link.  Is it in German? 

We have already had a very bad translation of The German Language on this Forum.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Have you got a link?

Yes, it’s already been posted on this thread at least once.  Would you like me to find it for you?