Author Topic: Why now?  (Read 73847 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Why now?
« Reply #90 on: June 06, 2020, 11:26:27 AM »
I doubt he will be tried period.  Article 6, HR, right to a fair trial.
Oh well never mind, perhaps the police can fall back on plan B and go after your suspects instead then.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline jassi

Re: Why now?
« Reply #91 on: June 06, 2020, 11:44:16 AM »
Plan B might be something along the lines of- We cannot progress prosecution of our prime suspect and are not looking at any other person.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Why now?
« Reply #92 on: June 06, 2020, 11:48:24 AM »
I doubt he will be tried period.  Article 6, HR, right to a fair trial.

Article 6 wont necessarily stop him being tried. He might try as others have. The police had no choice but to release his name in order to trace those thay want to interview. You act as though its a foregone conclusion.

the case you have highlighted...did you read it. The verdict was overturned due to the withholding of witness satetements by the prosecution...that was the main reason. The judge also said the press coverage was sensational...innaccurate  and misleading.  Is that true in this case.
« Last Edit: June 06, 2020, 12:01:41 PM by Davel »

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Why now?
« Reply #93 on: June 06, 2020, 12:01:30 PM »
Article 6 wont necessarily stop him being tried. He might try as others have. The police had no choice but to release his name in order to trace tthose thay want to interview. You act as though its a foregone conclusion.

Which police force named him and put out the image? 
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Why now?
« Reply #94 on: June 06, 2020, 12:02:43 PM »
Which police force named him and put out the image?

i doubt it matters...is the coverage of him sensational...innaccurate or misleading...as it wa sin the case you linked to

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Why now?
« Reply #95 on: June 06, 2020, 12:08:20 PM »
i doubt it matters...is the coverage of him sensational...innaccurate or misleading...as it wa sin the case you linked to

You said the police had no choice but to name him in order to trace those they want to interview.  I asked which police force named him and put out the image?
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Why now?
« Reply #96 on: June 06, 2020, 12:32:15 PM »
You said the police had no choice but to name him in order to trace those they want to interview.  I asked which police force named him and put out the image?

you tell me..

Offline G-Unit

Re: Why now?
« Reply #97 on: June 06, 2020, 01:24:51 PM »
I take it those reporters trotting around the Algarve will have to stay home for a fortnight when they return. Why they feel the need to be there, where nothing is happening, I can't imagine.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Why now?
« Reply #98 on: June 06, 2020, 01:30:34 PM »
I take it those reporters trotting around the Algarve will have to stay home for a fortnight when they return. Why they feel the need to be there, where nothing is happening, I can't imagine.
"Nothing to see here, move along, move along".
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline jassi

Re: Why now?
« Reply #99 on: June 06, 2020, 01:34:06 PM »
I take it those reporters trotting around the Algarve will have to stay home for a fortnight when they return. Why they feel the need to be there, where nothing is happening, I can't imagine.

They might just get back before quarantine is imposed
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Why now?
« Reply #100 on: June 06, 2020, 01:44:18 PM »
Whether or not he knew she was home alone is entirely irrelevant IMO.

There is no evidence of anybody going through the bedroom window that he reportedly used. I want new DNA tests - now that is relevant!
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Why now?
« Reply #101 on: June 06, 2020, 01:50:55 PM »

Because he was a professional burglar; watched holiday properties; saw parents coming and going...

Knew what time they’d be eating.
Plus, their apartment was right on the ROAD!

Couldn’t have been easier.

No-one knows at this stage, but he may have intended just burgling the apartment...then spotted Madeleine and took her instead. Opportunistic. He wouldn’t have stolen items too if he took Maddie by chance as he was a known burglar.

It’s very simple.

There is no evidence of a burglar or anybody going through the bedroom window as he reportedly used. You cannot convict somebody without evidence!
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Why now?
« Reply #102 on: June 06, 2020, 01:56:02 PM »
Alcohol loosens the tongue... And he didn't admit to abducting her afaik... He said he knew what happened to her.
He also admitted to raping someone and showed a recording of it... Hardly normal behaviour

Alcohol also fuels boasts and BS!  If they know what happened then why haven't they recovered the body?
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Why now?
« Reply #103 on: June 06, 2020, 01:57:37 PM »
Plan B might be something along the lines of- We cannot progress prosecution of our prime suspect and are not looking at any other person.

I'll tell you what.  I bet he won't do anything like this again.  And nor will he get a new identity.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Why now?
« Reply #104 on: June 06, 2020, 02:00:03 PM »
I'll tell you what.  I bet he won't do anything like this again.  And nor will he get a new identity.

I think a committed paedophile will always strike again, given the chance. It’s a compulsion they have no control over.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?