If you want to believe what The Sun says that's your prerogative, but I prefer facts.
First I don't take everything the sun says as true and I'm sure you understand that probably no one on this forum does. I've been trained to look at and assess evidence.
Everything I read and hear about the case is evidence...even the Sun's articles are evidence. The art is knowing how to sort the wheat from the chaffe and its not an exact science.
What I aim to do is look at every piece of evidence and judge how reliable it seems.
This article in the sun is quite interesting as the statements arent the simple...he told me he did it...but something diiferent and not the sort of thing...imo ...someone would invent...but who knows .
So how valuable are these statements..at this stage we don't know, but if statemnts have been taken from these ladies and they have said what's reported then that would be highly, highly significant. Perhaps they have and perhaps they both appear to be good witnesses...we dont know. Your reaction is simply to discard them as unreliable...that is not a fact so to claim you only deal in facts is untrue.
Whats interesting to me is that they supprt my idea that HCW is building a strong circumstantial case and if these ladies are prepared to go into court and repeat these allegations that would be very very significant. We dont know if that will happen...but I think we will know soon.