Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[Mr Gray]

...he said the evidence is so strong that maddie is dead and CB murdered her....

Oh how ridiculous...so why doesn't he charge him then what is he waiting for.

if you look at the RUi Pedro case the answers quite obvious.

Do I have to remind you again evidence is not proof

[kizzy]

if you look at the RUi Pedro case the answers quite obvious.

Do I have to remind you again evidence is not proof

It sounds as if he went straight in for the kill ..big mistake as he was expecting more.

Now it seems his non-evidence then is nothing more than he thinks CB did it.

Not really any even circumstantial evidence IMO.e has well over-egged what he has ...he backs down on the interview when asked how strong the evidence is ....

What is quite obvious his silence speaks volumes
 

[G-Unit]

if you look at the RUi Pedro case the answers quite obvious.

Do I have to remind you again evidence is not proof

Identifying a child in a photograph shouldn't be done without consulting those who knew the child best imo; the relatives.

[faithlilly]

he said the strong evidence is not the phone or witness words...he said the evidence is so strong that maddie is dead and CB murdered her....I dont see that as back tracking...I see as moving forward. Could have similar evidence as in the RUI Pedro case

If there indeed is something tangible to tie Brueckner to Madeleine then he would have been arrested and questioned....that is an inalienable fact.

[Mr Gray]

If there indeed is something tangible to tie Brueckner to Madeleine then he would have been arrested and questioned....that is an inalienable fact.

No it isn't

[Mr Gray]

It sounds as if he went straight in for the kill ..big mistake as he was expecting more.

Now it seems his non-evidence then is nothing more than he thinks CB did it.

Not really any even circumstantial evidence IMO.e has well over-egged what he has ...he backs down on the interview when asked how strong the evidence is ....

What is quite obvious his silence speaks volumes

I think he has proof of abduction..a major step forward

[Mr Gray]

Identifying a child in a photograph shouldn't be done without consulting those who knew the child best imo; the relatives.

It's the fact that it may have happened that's far more important imo

[kizzy]

I think he has proof of abduction..a major step forward

You ...dont know that though.

just like me saying he hasnt.

The thing is though if he is not charged as I doubt very much he will be. It's back to square one. If only this could be looked at with fresh eyes the leading up to Maddie not being in her bed at last check

1 DP going to 5a to check that all was ok and saw the beautiful scene he described...[close family freind]

2 gmcc visual check proud father moment. sees door moved but doesn't mention it to kmcc.

3 kmcc check door blowing shut curtains blowing but leaves the window open.gmcc wondering where she was

4 not searching but examining shutters and phoning as many as they could to get the abduction story in time for the media news.

A lot more things but IMO it all sound s a bit too convenient even though it took a couple of attempts with statements to get there.

[Mr Gray]

You ...dont know that though.

just like me saying he hasnt.

The thing is though if he is not charged as I doubt very much he will be. It's back to square one. If only this could be looked at with fresh eyes the leading up to Maddie not being in her bed at last check

1 DP going to 5a to check that all was ok and saw the beautiful scene he described...[close family freind]

2 gmcc visual check proud father moment. sees door moved but doesn't mention it to kmcc.

3 kmcc check door blowing shut curtains blowing but leaves the window open.gmcc wondering where she was

4 not searching but examining shutters and phoning as many as they could to get the abduction story in time for the media news.

A lot more things but IMO it all sound s a bit too convenient even though it took a couple of attempts with statements to get there.

It depends what HCW has...if it proves stranger abduction none of that matters and it's certainly not back to square one.
It would prove the parents innocence

Remember his very strong evidence may not be enough to convict CB ...it might be...but it will be very strong evidence...if not proof...of stranger abduction

[Brietta]

If there indeed is something tangible to tie Brueckner to Madeleine then he would have been arrested and questioned....that is an inalienable fact.

Brueckner is already arrested and is going nowhere anytime soon.  I am sure he will be questioned if or when it suits the Germans to do so.  In the interim I believe many wide ranging investigations concerning criminal cases are being conducted with this man at the core.

They have been investigating this man against the clock for years.  It was only a matter of time until nefarious reasons would cause premature release of his name into the public domain.

The question is why did Goncalo Amaral do that https://www.heraldsun.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/former-portuguese-police-chief-goncalo-amaral-says-madeleine-mccann-suspect-is-in-german-prison/news-story/13992e3c9cc61ef835a2d95a7f5a7025
And why would Goncalo Amaral release "evidence" into the public domain about Brueckner's vehicle with painted cartoons on its side https://zap.aeiou.pt/amaral-arrasa-investigacao-alema-331219
And why would Goncalo Amaral feed false information to the Portuguese public about Brueckner's hairstyle at the time of Madeleine's disappearance in 2007  https://www.cmjornal.pt/portugal/detalhe/goncalo-amaral-mostra-retrato-robo-de-suspeito-do-suspeito-do-caso-maddie-em-2007-que-desmente-versao-alema

Although he was really caught out when the truth of the lie was revealed with the publication of video footage of the Brueckner showing him with a short haircut  https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8576985/Madeleine-McCann-suspect-Christian-Brueckner-kidnap-campervan-weeks-vanished.html

The question really is why is Amaral so intent on preserving Brueckner's right to the presumption of innocence while stamping vigorously on McCann human rights for thirteen+ years ... even to defending Brueckner with the deliberate introduction of false evidence (hairstyle) while vigorously traducing Madeleine's parents.

[G-Unit]

Brueckner is already arrested and is going nowhere anytime soon.  I am sure he will be questioned if or when it suits the Germans to do so.  In the interim I believe many wide ranging investigations concerning criminal cases are being conducted with this man at the core.

They have been investigating this man against the clock for years.  It was only a matter of time until nefarious reasons would cause premature release of his name into the public domain.

The question is why did Goncalo Amaral do that https://www.heraldsun.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/former-portuguese-police-chief-goncalo-amaral-says-madeleine-mccann-suspect-is-in-german-prison/news-story/13992e3c9cc61ef835a2d95a7f5a7025
And why would Goncalo Amaral release "evidence" into the public domain about Brueckner's vehicle with painted cartoons on its side https://zap.aeiou.pt/amaral-arrasa-investigacao-alema-331219
And why would Goncalo Amaral feed false information to the Portuguese public about Brueckner's hairstyle at the time of Madeleine's disappearance in 2007  https://www.cmjornal.pt/portugal/detalhe/goncalo-amaral-mostra-retrato-robo-de-suspeito-do-suspeito-do-caso-maddie-em-2007-que-desmente-versao-alema

Although he was really caught out when the truth of the lie was revealed with the publication of video footage of the Brueckner showing him with a short haircut  https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8576985/Madeleine-McCann-suspect-Christian-Brueckner-kidnap-campervan-weeks-vanished.html

The question really is why is Amaral so intent on preserving Brueckner's right to the presumption of innocence while stamping vigorously on McCann human rights for thirteen+ years ... even to defending Brueckner with the deliberate introduction of false evidence (hairstyle) while vigorously traducing Madeleine's parents.

Brueckner cannot be questioned until he's arrested, and there's not enough evidence to arrest him. At the moment he's in prison for drug offences. As to his rape conviction, it isn't clear to me if that decision is final;

"he was sentenced to seven years in prison by the Braunschweig Regional Court for raping a 72-year-old girl in the Algarve in 2005. This penalty is currently being examined by the Federal Court of Justice and is not final."
https://www.fnp.de/deutschland/maddie-mccann-anwalt-christian-b-kritik-medien-vermisst-tot-verdacht-zr-13810982.html

If that conviction were quashed he may not be sitting in jail when and if they decide to arrest him.

[faithlilly]

Brueckner is already arrested and is going nowhere anytime soon.  I am sure he will be questioned if or when it suits the Germans to do so.  In the interim I believe many wide ranging investigations concerning criminal cases are being conducted with this man at the core.

They have been investigating this man against the clock for years.  It was only a matter of time until nefarious reasons would cause premature release of his name into the public domain.

The question is why did Goncalo Amaral do that https://www.heraldsun.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/former-portuguese-police-chief-goncalo-amaral-says-madeleine-mccann-suspect-is-in-german-prison/news-story/13992e3c9cc61ef835a2d95a7f5a7025
And why would Goncalo Amaral release "evidence" into the public domain about Brueckner's vehicle with painted cartoons on its side https://zap.aeiou.pt/amaral-arrasa-investigacao-alema-331219
And why would Goncalo Amaral feed false information to the Portuguese public about Brueckner's hairstyle at the time of Madeleine's disappearance in 2007  https://www.cmjornal.pt/portugal/detalhe/goncalo-amaral-mostra-retrato-robo-de-suspeito-do-suspeito-do-caso-maddie-em-2007-que-desmente-versao-alema

Although he was really caught out when the truth of the lie was revealed with the publication of video footage of the Brueckner showing him with a short haircut  https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8576985/Madeleine-McCann-suspect-Christian-Brueckner-kidnap-campervan-weeks-vanished.html

The question really is why is Amaral so intent on preserving Brueckner's right to the presumption of innocence while stamping vigorously on McCann human rights for thirteen+ years ... even to defending Brueckner with the deliberate introduction of false evidence (hairstyle) while vigorously traducing Madeleine's parents.

Scotland Yard’s attitude to Wolter and his ‘evidence’ tells us everything we need to know. Have you listened to the MS’s podcast yet ?

Amaral is old news I’m afraid and you really do need to move on.

[Brietta]

Brueckner cannot be questioned until he's arrested, and there's not enough evidence to arrest him. At the moment he's in prison for drug offences. As to his rape conviction, it isn't clear to me if that decision is final;

"he was sentenced to seven years in prison by the Braunschweig Regional Court for raping a 72-year-old girl in the Algarve in 2005. This penalty is currently being examined by the Federal Court of Justice and is not final."
https://www.fnp.de/deutschland/maddie-mccann-anwalt-christian-b-kritik-medien-vermisst-tot-verdacht-zr-13810982.html

If that conviction were quashed he may not be sitting in jail when and if they decide to arrest him.

I know why Brueckner is in jail and I am quite content that the Germans will handle the situation to best advantage when it suits them to do so.

I did however address other observations about evidence and the introduction of false evidence into this case in my post.

Did you miss them?

Or can I expect you to formulate some kind of answer in the very near future :)

[Eleanor]

Brueckner cannot be questioned until he's arrested, and there's not enough evidence to arrest him. At the moment he's in prison for drug offences. As to his rape conviction, it isn't clear to me if that decision is final;

"he was sentenced to seven years in prison by the Braunschweig Regional Court for raping a 72-year-old girl in the Algarve in 2005. This penalty is currently being examined by the Federal Court of Justice and is not final."
https://www.fnp.de/deutschland/maddie-mccann-anwalt-christian-b-kritik-medien-vermisst-tot-verdacht-zr-13810982.html

If that conviction were quashed he may not be sitting in jail when and if they decide to arrest him.

The Germans will find something to hang on to him.  The Pornography they found could well be enough.

[jassi]

The Germans will find something to hang on to him. The Pornography they found could well be enough.

Has he not already served time for that, as it was found several years ago ?