Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300622 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2205 on: October 29, 2020, 05:02:28 PM »
It might be in the case of a missing child. Looking for signs of  abuse or mental disorder - that sort of thing - being thorough.
The child's record perhaps ... but a suspects ?
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2206 on: October 29, 2020, 05:06:33 PM »
The child's record perhaps ... but a suspects ?

Obviously both of The McCanns are Psychopaths, init.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2207 on: October 29, 2020, 05:10:29 PM »
The child's record perhaps ... but a suspects ?

Of course. If the suspect had any kind of mental health problems it may be very relevant.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2208 on: October 29, 2020, 06:20:20 PM »
....and detecting the acrid and unmistakable stench of BS almost from the get go. IMEE.
WALOB
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2209 on: October 29, 2020, 06:28:58 PM »
WALOB
Are you abusing the General?  Could you please explain the acronym "WALOB".

"WHAT DOES WALOB MEAN?
What A Load Of Bull"
https://www.slang.org/walob-meaning-definition/#:~:text=call%20me%20on%20my%20cell
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2210 on: October 29, 2020, 06:32:39 PM »
Are you abusing the General?  Could you please explain the acronym "WALOB".

"WHAT DOES WALOB MEAN?
What A Load Of Bull"
https://www.slang.org/walob-meaning-definition/#:~:text=call%20me%20on%20my%20cell

What a Lot of Balls.  It's a compliment.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2211 on: October 29, 2020, 06:35:29 PM »
What a Lot of Balls.  It's a compliment.
WALOB
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2212 on: October 29, 2020, 06:37:08 PM »
Obviously both of The McCanns are Psychopaths, init.

Please explain.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2213 on: October 29, 2020, 06:43:54 PM »
Please explain.

Didn't you know?  That was the story a long time ago.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2214 on: October 29, 2020, 07:17:19 PM »
Didn't you know?  That was the story a long time ago.
So you were joking?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Angelo222

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2215 on: October 29, 2020, 07:33:39 PM »
Obviously both of The McCanns are Psychopaths, init.

Do you mean that in a bad way?
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2216 on: October 29, 2020, 07:35:10 PM »
So you were joking?

Yes Rob, a bit of an 'in' thing  ... along the lines of 'free speach [sic]'

Silly I know, but then so much is in my opinion.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2217 on: October 29, 2020, 07:40:05 PM »
Do you mean that in a bad way?

One description I would have used is 'ironic' although there may be others.

What do you think is a bad way as opposed to a good one?
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Angelo222

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2218 on: October 29, 2020, 07:42:59 PM »
Which is why I find it so distasteful that I have used private medical information such as this as a debating point.  Particularly as it belongs to a person with absolutely nothing to do with anything but which someone saw fit to release into the public domain.

That the PJ were unable to gain access to the McCann medical record (what evidence they expected to find there I have no idea) is not pejorative to Kate and Gerry as it seems to be thought.
In my opinion it reveals a really panicked and floundering investigation clutching at straws.

That's not the only thing the PJ were denied by the English police in this case.  It all stinks of a conspiracy imo.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2219 on: October 29, 2020, 07:45:48 PM »
That's not the only thing the PJ were denied by the English police in this case.  It all stinks of a conspiracy imo.


I think the PJ were just useless