Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300412 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #795 on: September 30, 2020, 05:39:18 PM »
Christian B is many things but I have never seen anyone (outside Maddie case) claim that he is a killer.  IMO he is nothing more than yet another patsy. Had he been a free man the German authorities would never have dared reveal his name.

I don't believe for a second that Brueckner ever saw Maddie let alone abducted her.
If he’s a poor wee patsy then what sort of a person do you think made off with Madeleine or her body?  The British authorities released Shipmans name to the press before he was ever charged, how do you account for that?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Lace

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #796 on: September 30, 2020, 05:49:44 PM »
Christian B is many things but I have never seen anyone (outside Maddie case) claim that he is a killer.  IMO he is nothing more than yet another patsy. Had he been a free man the German authorities would never have dared reveal his name.

I don't believe for a second that Brueckner ever saw Maddie let alone abducted her.

He beat a woman before raping her,  he beat his girlfriend,  how can you say it wouldn't escalate to murder?

Your last sentence is ridiculous,  you don't know if he saw Madeleine or not so cannot claim that he didn't.

Offline Lace

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #797 on: September 30, 2020, 05:54:26 PM »
Well in my opinion a tragic accident that could ruin the mccs I believe.carreer/family etc.

Could also be Put them together and you have means, motive and opportunity.

Don't you think an abduction would have given the McCann's more publicity?   Far worse than an accident I would say,  with abduction you don't know what the hell is happening to her.

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #798 on: September 30, 2020, 06:23:55 PM »
Don't you think an abduction would have given the McCann's more publicity?   Far worse than an accident I would say,  with abduction you don't know what the hell is happening to her.

It would appear that it did. World-wide fame and misfortune
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #799 on: September 30, 2020, 07:04:57 PM »
I do not think he has.  They were questioned as arguidos for their own protection as dictated by Portuguese law which we have discussed ad nauseam.  Brueckner has not been questioned at all, yet he is a formal suspect.  Entirely different.

Of course we might be able to make a more informed decision if the currently available spate of video clips from Portuguese TV was being translated for us by the usual translators.
But they are not.
What I have noticed are clips of a dog barking its head off and a dearth of the weel kent faces we usually see as pundits on these shows.  Not much now from Amaral and certainly nothing from Cristovao:  I think some bubbles may well have been burst :(

He is a prime suspect in Germany, not Portugal imo. (arguido = prime suspect)
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Lace

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #800 on: September 30, 2020, 07:27:09 PM »
It would appear that it did. World-wide fame and misfortune

So why would they want to fake an abduction?

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #801 on: September 30, 2020, 07:32:13 PM »
To shift the blame onto some unknown person.  IMO
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Angelo222

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #802 on: September 30, 2020, 07:50:11 PM »

I think some bubbles may well have been burst :(

Not much now from HCW. either.

The Germans are grasping at straws and little ones at that.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #803 on: September 30, 2020, 07:53:38 PM »
Is this the start of the crumbling circumstantial evidence.


‘CAN’T PIN IT ON HIM’ Madeleine McCann suspect Christian B could be cleared of Irish woman’s rape as DNA doesn’t match crime scene


https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12809102/cops-madeleine-mccann-suspect-christian-b-rape-dna/

You have to wonder what the link to Madeleine is in this story,the gift that keeps giving.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Angelo222

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #804 on: September 30, 2020, 07:53:44 PM »
He beat a woman before raping her,  he beat his girlfriend,  how can you say it wouldn't escalate to murder?

Your last sentence is ridiculous,  you don't know if he saw Madeleine or not so cannot claim that he didn't.

I am entitled to my belief just as the German investigator is.  No mention by the Germans of the illegal conduct perpetrated by the McCanns and their Kennedy pals in their failed crusade against Amaral though.  IMO it is only a matter of time before this particular issue rises to the surface.
« Last Edit: September 30, 2020, 07:56:30 PM by Angelo222 »
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Angelo222

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #805 on: September 30, 2020, 07:55:00 PM »
Is this the start of the crumbling circumstantial evidence.


‘CAN’T PIN IT ON HIM’ Madeleine McCann suspect Christian B could be cleared of Irish woman’s rape as DNA doesn’t match crime scene


https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12809102/cops-madeleine-mccann-suspect-christian-b-rape-dna/

Nice find kizzy   8((()*/
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Anthro

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #806 on: September 30, 2020, 07:59:18 PM »
Christian B is many things but I have never seen anyone (outside Maddie case) claim that he is a killer.  IMO he is nothing more than yet another patsy. Had he been a free man the German authorities would never have dared reveal his name.

I don't believe for a second that Brueckner ever saw Maddie let alone abducted her.
I agree, Brückner does not come across as a killer but in my opinion he definitely is not being framed for Madeleine’s disappearance. German authorities never revealed his true identity and I doubt that they would make these bold statements re. what they have on Brückner.

Offline Anthro

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #807 on: September 30, 2020, 08:01:36 PM »
He's forgotten the four arguidos instigated by OG in July 2014, six years ago, it seems.
I was under the impression the 4 ‘arguidos’ were called as witnesses in 2014?

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #808 on: September 30, 2020, 08:07:29 PM »
I was under the impression the 4 ‘arguidos’ were called as witnesses in 2014?

The status of arguidos in the Portuguese judicial system refers to individuals whom police may reasonably suspect are linked to a crime.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-28101400
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #809 on: September 30, 2020, 08:09:05 PM »
I was under the impression the 4 ‘arguidos’ were called as witnesses in 2014?

Mark Rowley 2017:Q: You’ve talked about 600 people. You at one point had four suspects. Can you tell me the story
about how they came into the frame?
MR: So, one of the lines of enquiry, one of the hypotheses was could this be a burglary gone wrong?
Someone is doing a burglary, panicked maybe by a waking child, which leads to Madeleine going
missing.
Q: How old were the suspects because I think you interviewed them originally through the Portuguese
beginning of July 2014?
MR: By the end of the year we were happy to have brought them out and we were moving on to other
parts of the investigation
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.