Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300324 times)

0 Members and 16 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Lace

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #840 on: October 01, 2020, 12:51:26 PM »
Who suggested that scenario?

Amaral's theory is that Madeleine fell of the sofa and hit her head which caused her death.   Amaral says Kate's finger prints were on the window,  suggesting she opened it.   Amaral was accusing Kate of hiding Madeleine's body, the Police suggested to her that she must have had a black out. 

Offline Lace

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #841 on: October 01, 2020, 12:52:54 PM »
No wonder you believe in abduction ....if that's how YOU think it happened.

I don't believe that happened that's why I believe Madeleine was abducted.
« Last Edit: October 01, 2020, 12:55:28 PM by Brietta »

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #842 on: October 01, 2020, 12:53:21 PM »
Amaral's theory is that Madeleine fell of the sofa and hit her head which caused her death.   Amaral says Kate's finger prints were on the window,  suggesting she opened it.   Amaral was accusing Kate of hiding Madeleine's body, the Police suggested to her that she must have had a black out.
Who had the Blackout?  I never heard of that?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Lace

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #843 on: October 01, 2020, 12:55:03 PM »
Who had the Blackout?  I never heard of that?

It's in Kate's book Rob.   When the Police were interrogating her they suggested she could have had a black out and couldn't remember what she did.

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #844 on: October 01, 2020, 02:15:10 PM »
It's in Kate's book Rob.   When the Police were interrogating her they suggested she could have had a black out and couldn't remember what she did.

Why should her book be any more believable than the GA book?

Offline Lace

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #845 on: October 01, 2020, 02:20:33 PM »
Why should her book be any more believable than the GA book?

We know for definite that some of the things written in Amaral's book are not true.   Such as Calpol helping children to sleep,  the dog alerts and DNA proving there had been a body in 5a,  Gerry being a Surgeon,  Kate having marked the page in the Bible,   Kate's Dad saying they give Calpol to the children to help them sleep.  I'm sure there are more. 

Offline Lace

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #846 on: October 01, 2020, 02:22:29 PM »
Why should her book be any more believable than the GA book?

Why do you think Kate's lawyer advised her not to answer the questions?   It was because they were accusing her of staging an abduction.   Kate was the one who found her missing.

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #847 on: October 01, 2020, 02:33:20 PM »
Why do you think Kate's lawyer advised her not to answer the questions?   It was because they were accusing her of staging an abduction.   Kate was the one who found her missing.

Both posts IMO ....only your version of things...OR IYO.

You don't know why kmc didn't answer those questions.

Or if her book was any different to GAs.

They I believe had the nerve to say it stopped people looking for maddie. GA book. and some on here.

Yet they have no problem with HCW saying Maddie is dead, so who do they think is looking for her now.


Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #848 on: October 01, 2020, 02:40:19 PM »
Both posts IMO ....only your version of things...OR IYO.

You don't know why kmc didn't answer those questions.

Or if her book was any different to GAs.

They I believe had the nerve to say it stopped people looking for maddie. GA book. and some on here.

Yet they have no problem with HCW saying Maddie is dead, so who do they think is looking for her now.

The British police ~ the German police ~ the Portuguese police.  None of whom are investigating any evidence relating to any other than Brueckner who is their prime suspect in Madeleine McCann's abduction.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #849 on: October 01, 2020, 02:51:54 PM »
The British police ~ the German police ~ the Portuguese police.  None of whom are investigating any evidence relating to any other than Brueckner who is their prime suspect in Madeleine McCann's abduction.

And how exactly do you know that?
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #850 on: October 01, 2020, 03:50:52 PM »
The British police ~ the German police ~ the Portuguese police.  None of whom are investigating any evidence relating to any other than Brueckner who is their prime suspect in Madeleine McCann's abduction.

So that's IYO as well or what the media are saying.

I cant see how they can even possibly think they can charge CB without a body or DNA.

Yet in the mccs case.



It is thought that the McCanns' high-powered lawyers have told them that without a body it will be extremely difficult for the authorities to press charges.

 

A close friend said: "The legitimate question to ask Portuguese police is: 'Where is the body? Where is the evidence that Madeleine is dead? We have got no idea'."

 

The change in the family's tone – just days after the McCanns were still pleading for the search for Madeleine to continue – surprised sources close to the investigation.

 

"It seems remarkable that just days after the McCanns were saying they thought Madeleine was still alive and missing, now they're talking about a body," a source said. "I don’t know if this is really the McCanns speaking or just one of the people working on their publicity campaign but it is not the kind of comment to impress a team of detectives who think you’re guilty."

 



Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #851 on: October 01, 2020, 04:13:29 PM »


Oh was it that good you had to bump it B.

Never mind its gone..

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #852 on: October 01, 2020, 05:44:33 PM »
It appears that the DNA results were kept, not the material from which the results were obtained..
Presumably DNA results from a crime scene could be kept in perpetuity - subject to the law  of the land
Just how competent were the Portuguese at collecting and analysing DNA found at scenes of crimes in 2004?  Didn’t they have to outsource analysisof this in the McCann case? 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #853 on: October 01, 2020, 05:54:37 PM »
Oh was it that good you had to bump it B.

Never mind its gone..

Actually it was the cat.  I hope you are not offended that she laughed herself silly as a result :)
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #854 on: October 01, 2020, 06:09:56 PM »
Actually it was the cat.  I hope you are not offended that she laughed herself silly as a result :)

Aww what a clever cat you have....offended no not at all why should I be