Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300064 times)

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Anthro

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #885 on: October 02, 2020, 08:05:01 PM »
Mc's were made arguidoes by Portuguese authorities. CB made scapegoat by tabloids.
I think your comment is dated re. Brückner and the current investigation into Madeleine’s disappearance. ‘Scapegoat by tabloids’ has reference.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #886 on: October 02, 2020, 08:09:12 PM »
I think your comment is dated re. Brückner and the current investigation into Madeleine’s disappearance. ‘Scapegoat by tabloids’ has reference.

Mc's were named by officialdom; not so for CB.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #887 on: October 02, 2020, 08:19:38 PM »
Mc's were named by officialdom; not so for CB.

The Mcs were made arguida by the initial investigation who didnt understand the evidence....fact...Almeida who wrote the interim report stated in court...according to the guardian...the main evidence against teh McCanns was the dog alerts...what codswallop.

CB is not named as a prime suspect by the tabloids...but by the german prosecutor.
« Last Edit: October 02, 2020, 09:11:22 PM by G-Unit »

Offline Anthro

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #888 on: October 02, 2020, 08:49:08 PM »
Mc's were named by officialdom; not so for CB.
Holly, honestly in my opinion, familiarse yourself with the current discourse. You seem to participate when it suits you.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #889 on: October 02, 2020, 09:03:46 PM »
This is what is so so wrong with this forum and why posters such as myself are leaving. This post by  a moderator is total ...total rubbish.The Mcs were made arguida by the initial investigation who didnt understand the evidence....fact...Almeida who wrote the interim report stated in court...according to the guardian...the main evidence against teh McCanns was the dog alerts...what codswallop.

CB is not named as a prime suspect by the tabloids...but by the german prosecutor. Your post is so innaccurate its laughable...no doubt you will have lots of support

The German prosecutor has not named CB.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #890 on: October 02, 2020, 09:06:00 PM »
Holly, honestly in my opinion, familiarse yourself with the current discourse. You seem to participate when it suits you.

The current discourse being...
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #891 on: October 02, 2020, 09:09:02 PM »
The German prosecutor has not named CB.

hes made it clear who he is talking about...as has his lawyer...as has amaral...perahps you need to familiarise yourself with whats been going on...
« Last Edit: October 02, 2020, 09:14:20 PM by G-Unit »

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #892 on: October 02, 2020, 09:12:08 PM »
This is what is so so wrong with this forum and why posters such as myself are leaving. This post by  a moderator is total ...total rubbish.The Mcs were made arguida by the initial investigation who didnt understand the evidence....fact...Almeida who wrote the interim report stated in court...according to the guardian...the main evidence against teh McCanns was the dog alerts...what codswallop.

CB is not named as a prime suspect by the tabloids...but by the german prosecutor. Your post is so innaccurate its laughable...no doubt you will have lots of support

Davel have you considered prosecutors' opening speech at trials?  They puff out their chests and beat the drum hard about how the jury will learn the defendent is guilty as charged but in most cases defendents walk.  Its what prosecutor's are paid to do.  Listen to FF for the defence and you hear a completely different story. 
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #893 on: October 02, 2020, 09:13:41 PM »
Davel have you considered prosecutors' opening speech at trials?  They puff out their chests and beat the drum hard about how the jury will learn the defendent is guilty as charged but in most cases defendents walk.  Its what prosecutor's are paid to do.  Listen to FF for the defence and you hear a completely different story.

your post is complete and utter BS...imo...are you aware his original lawyers disowned him in June this year..


Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #894 on: October 02, 2020, 09:14:40 PM »
hes made it clear who he is talking about...as has his lawyer...as has amaral...perahps you need to familiarise yourself with whats been going on...you seem to be in total denial...like alot of popelle

You said the prosecutor named CB but he hasn't because it's against the law to do so.  The tabloids outed CB and I understand wil be paying dearly in the same way they did with Mc's and RM.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #895 on: October 02, 2020, 09:16:34 PM »
your post is complete and utter BS...imo...are you aware his original lawyers disowned him in June this year..

Disowned him? 
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #896 on: October 02, 2020, 09:17:03 PM »
You said the prosecutor named CB but he hasn't because it's against the law to do so.  The tabloids outed CB and I understand wil be paying dearly in the same way they did with Mc's and RM.

you understand nothing...his own lawyer has outed him ,,,as has amaral...is he going to sue them too...ypur post is laughable

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #897 on: October 02, 2020, 09:18:21 PM »
Disowned him?

yes...refused to represent him...in june...when he was named as prime suspect in the Mcccann case

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #898 on: October 02, 2020, 09:20:06 PM »
You said the prosecutor named CB but he hasn't because it's against the law to do so.  The tabloids outed CB and I understand wil be paying dearly in the same way they did with Mc's and RM.

are you suddenly an expert in german law...LOL...as i said  ...laughable

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #899 on: October 02, 2020, 09:20:52 PM »
yes...refused to represent him...in june...when he was named as prime suspect in the Mcccann case

Cite please
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?