Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300344 times)

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #930 on: October 03, 2020, 11:02:27 AM »
I think you will find HCW and FF refer
To CB as Christian B. The tabloids outed him.

The tabloids didn't make him a suspect
HCW made him a suspect and gave enough information for others to identify him...clever move

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #931 on: October 03, 2020, 11:05:51 AM »
I reported a crime in may 2018...it's yet to get to court

This is a high profile case with hundreds of 000's spent during the last 3/4 years only to result in farcical public appeal.  Its going nowhere.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #932 on: October 03, 2020, 11:08:15 AM »
This is a high profile case with hundreds of 000's spent during the last 3/4 years only to result in farcical public appeal.  Its going nowhere.
In your opinion...I think based on everything HCW has said there is a reasonably high chance of charges being brought..we shall see

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #933 on: October 03, 2020, 11:20:38 AM »
In your opinion...I think based on everything HCW has said there is a reasonably high chance of charges being brought..we shall see

Yeah we'll see.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #934 on: October 03, 2020, 11:25:18 AM »
Yeah we'll see.

HCW has said he will not let it drag on beyond the new year so not too long to wait

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #935 on: October 03, 2020, 12:00:35 PM »
Did he,thought CB's bestest mate gave SY the name and they (SY) passed it on.

I think there has been and continues to be a lot more taking place in Madeleine's investigation than any of us are ever likely to know about.

Remember the 2014 mantra graffitied around what to many was an inexplicable search site saying ~  "A polícia britânica é estúpida"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2654890/Police-Madeleine-McCann-search-begin-combing-new-patch-scrubland-today-near-went-missing-seven-years-ago.html

I believe in 2007 there were a lot of abandoned and derelict areas around Luz which might have been worth a good look.  But I think the areas searched in 2014 had a lot more pointing to the involvement of an itinerant like Brueckner who knew the area like the back of his hand.

I can see nothing at all linking these search areas with strangers who had been in Luz for less than a week.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #936 on: October 03, 2020, 12:04:19 PM »
But in this instance its years!  According to DCI Mark Cranwell CB first entered the inquiry in 2017!

For all we know Scotland Yard might have been after him or someone fitting his profile exactly for a lot longer than that.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #937 on: October 03, 2020, 12:56:00 PM »
But in this instance its years!  According to DCI Mark Cranwell CB first entered the inquiry in 2017!
You do understand that sometimes it takes years to build a case against a suspect don't you?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #938 on: October 03, 2020, 01:04:54 PM »
You do understand that sometimes it takes years to build a case against a suspect don't you?
So maybe HCW's bosses have given him a time limit, hence Davel expects some progress by Christmas.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Myster

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #939 on: October 03, 2020, 01:10:42 PM »
You do understand that sometimes it takes years to build a case against a suspect don't you?
Unless you're a doctor with a good head and then it only takes four weeks at the most.
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #940 on: October 03, 2020, 01:15:43 PM »
This is no ordinary case it's 13 years old with no forensic evidence it seems. Mostly circumstantial...HCW has confirmed he doesn't need a body...that's a clue.
I think he's contacting every known asociate of CB and a big part will be his lack of alibi and no explanation for where he was on the day and days after the disappearance too
« Last Edit: October 03, 2020, 01:19:18 PM by Davel »

Offline Snowgirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #941 on: October 03, 2020, 02:37:22 PM »
This is no ordinary case it's 13 years old with no forensic evidence it seems. Mostly circumstantial...HCW has confirmed he doesn't need a body...that's a clue.
I think he's contacting every known asociate of CB and a big part will be his lack of alibi and no explanation for where he was on the day and days after the disappearance too
Can anyone here present recall exactly where they were that day in May 13 years on and give an explanation.for where they were days after ? .
I would say not .

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #942 on: October 03, 2020, 02:40:46 PM »
Can anyone here present recall exactly where they were that day in May 13 years on and give an explanation.for where they were days after ? .
I would say not .

You didn't live in Luz in 2007....I don't need any confirmation from anyone here...I know exactly what I'm talking about

His girlfriend knows exactly where she an he were the day before the disappearance..
« Last Edit: October 03, 2020, 02:43:00 PM by Davel »

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #943 on: October 03, 2020, 02:59:34 PM »
Can anyone here present recall exactly where they were that day in May 13 years on and give an explanation.for where they were days after ? .
I would say not .

The day on which Madeleine disappeared somewhere near you?  And then changed the name on your car registration?  I would remember.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #944 on: October 03, 2020, 03:12:52 PM »
The moderation on this forum has reached an all time low. It appears john has just given me a warning for using bad laguage...which  plainly isnt true. If john doesnt want an opposing point of view expressed thats up to him