Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300201 times)

0 Members and 29 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1095 on: October 04, 2020, 09:16:18 PM »
But you don't know what Wolters has..

Enough evidence to show CB killed MM
Concrete evidence

Let's hope he doesn't disappoint you. You'd look silly if he can't produce his concrete evidence after you've put your faith in him.

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Angelo222

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1096 on: October 04, 2020, 09:16:55 PM »
Didn't find anything though did they

Was that after the English police refused the Portuguese requests?
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Angelo222

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1097 on: October 04, 2020, 09:17:47 PM »
Let's hope he doesn't disappoint you. You'd look silly if he can't produce his concrete evidence after you've put your faith in him.

Davel shouldn't hold his breath.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1098 on: October 04, 2020, 09:18:43 PM »
Was that after the English police refused the Portuguese requests?

What refusals were those?
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Anthro

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1099 on: October 04, 2020, 09:25:43 PM »
And given that the only evidence against him is some pathetic fairytale by another loser they would be laughed out of court.
Often these ‘losers’ you are referring to, bring perspective and truth. A credible witness does not have to be above the law. My opinion. In Brückner’s case, his ‘loser’ friends coming forward may well indicate that they have valuable information to offer.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1100 on: October 04, 2020, 09:27:59 PM »
Was that after the English police refused the Portuguese requests?

The UK police refused nothing...it's not up to the police... doctors are particularly reticent about releasing medical records

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1101 on: October 04, 2020, 09:29:36 PM »
Let's hope he doesn't disappoint you. You'd look silly if he can't produce his concrete evidence after you've put your faith in him.

And you and Angelo...and others think he has nothing
« Last Edit: October 04, 2020, 09:32:58 PM by Davel »

Offline Anthro

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1102 on: October 04, 2020, 09:34:54 PM »
The Smith sighting aside taken with Kate McCann's refusal to cooperate, the Portuguese police were perfectly within their rights to investigate the McCanns given the information provided about them and their suspicious activities post disappearance.  No competent detective would rule out the parents so early on in any case involving the possible death of an infant.
I agree with you, Angelo. But is it not logical that after 13 years, we need to accept that Madeleine’s parents are not suspects in her disappearance? Also, Madeleine was not an infant at the time. She was a toddler.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1103 on: October 04, 2020, 09:54:34 PM »
Often these ‘losers’ you are referring to, bring perspective and truth. A credible witness does not have to be above the law. My opinion. In Brückner’s case, his ‘loser’ friends coming forward may well indicate that they have valuable information to offer.

It’s a pity most juries disagree. The defence will crucify them on the stand.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline John

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1104 on: October 04, 2020, 10:00:30 PM »
I agree with you, Angelo. But is it not logical that after 13 years, we need to accept that Madeleine’s parents are not suspects in her disappearance? Also, Madeleine was not an infant at the time. She was a toddler.

I agree as to the parents non culpability in Madeleine's disappearance even though they contributed to it by their recklessness. The post disappearance events however are another matter as was pointed out previously.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1105 on: October 04, 2020, 10:01:47 PM »
It’s a pity most juries disagree. The defence will crucify them on the stand.

i cannot see HCW going this far simply with one or two informers...we need to wait and see.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1106 on: October 04, 2020, 10:04:29 PM »
I agree as to the parents non culpability in Madeleine's disappearance even though they contributed to it by their recklessness. The post disappearance events however are another matter as was pointed out previously.

its  amatter of opinion and I havent seen any relaible evidence to support anything. All just seems to be manufactured by morais and lawyers for amaral and the discredited PJ officers involved in the torture trial
« Last Edit: October 04, 2020, 10:08:41 PM by Davel »

Offline sadie

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1107 on: October 04, 2020, 11:11:01 PM »
Hi Sadie, I also think it’s possible authorities are targeting the likes of Brückner first, as part of a much bigger investigation, possibly involving high profile persons. Brückner may well be proved to be the first link in a much bigger chain. My opinion. That might explain more funding towards the investigation (?)

I think that you might be right, Anthro.   Unhappily, I also think that some are probably untouchable

Offline sadie

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1108 on: October 04, 2020, 11:17:14 PM »
This goes on everywhere Sadie, you'd be knifed in London for nicking a kebab. Portugal is by no means unique...in fact I would say Portugal is one of the safest places in Europe these days.

Orly ?

I hadn't noticed ?>)()<

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1109 on: October 05, 2020, 08:00:14 AM »
HCW has said he has concrete evidence maddie is dead and CB killed her. He said he will not share this evidence with the PJ or SY at the moment. The phone pings and the informants testimony have all been shared so he must have something apart from these