Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[The General]

HCW has said he has concrete evidence maddie is dead and CB killed her. He said he will not share this evidence with the PJ or SY at the moment. The phone pings and the informants testimony have all been shared so he must have something apart from these

It could literally be concrete; a piece of actual concrete.

[Wonderfulspam]

Hi Sadie, I also think it’s possible authorities are targeting the likes of Brückner first, as part of a much bigger investigation, possibly involving high profile persons. Brückner may well be proved to be the first link in a much bigger chain. My opinion. That might explain more funding towards the investigation (?)

Is there any evidence to support this theory?

[kizzy]

It sometimes takes months to bring charges - look at the Shipman case.  First identified as a potential killer months prior to being charged, plus his full name and back history was in all the tabs before charges were brought.

Must be a doctor thing, then why they are careful or I believe give them kid-glove treatment.

Mind you that could be because doctors are there to save peoples life keep them safe ...not kill them.

[kizzy]

Has HCW written a book telling the world that Madeline is dead ?

Oh come on L ...he doesn't have to write a book it seems he has told he world Maddie is dead

In every media source possible and states as fact I believe has concrete evidence that she is dead.

GA wrote a book on the police files...it was the mcs who made a good job of publicising that as saying it was liable.

[Holly Goodhead]

HCW has said he has concrete evidence maddie is dead and CB killed her. He said he will not share this evidence with the PJ or SY at the moment. The phone pings and the informants testimony have all been shared so he must have something apart from these

Prosecutor's are paid to prosecute regardless of how strong or weak they think a case is against defendents.  Listen to  opening arguments at any trial and you will hear prosecuting counsel tell jurors he/she is guilty as charged and the evidence against is compelling blah, blah.  A significant number of trials result in an acquital.  CB hasn't even been questioned let alone charged.  The fact HCW said x, y, z means squat imo.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Prosecutor's are paid to prosecute regardless of how strong or weak they think a case is against defendents.  Listen to  opening arguments at any trial and you will hear prosecuting counsel tell jurors he/she is guilty as charged and the evidence against is compelling blah, blah.  A significant number of trials result in an acquital.  CB hasn't even been questioned let alone charged.  The fact HCW said x, y, z means squat imo.

what percentage, out of interest?

[kizzy]

I'm sure when Wolters us ready he will be. His lawyer has already said he won't answer any and his previous lawyers ditched him in June

Maybe his previous lawyer ditched him ... because of threats made to stay away from the mcc case. IMO.



QUOTE Friedrich Fulscher

He admitted that ‘I don’t sleep as well as I used to’, partly due to threats he started receiving when he took on the case.

‘I’ve had threats, lots of them, some of them death threats,’ he said. ‘Some of them have been online and some of them have been on the phone.

‘I have pressed charges on some of them. I’ve also been told my life is in danger for looking into the Madeleine McCann case.’

He also said that he has been to Portugal to review years-worth of evidence collected in the case, and uncovered some ‘completely new’ information.

[Mr Gray]

Prosecutor's are paid to prosecute regardless of how strong or weak they think a case is against defendents.  Listen to  opening arguments at any trial and you will hear prosecuting counsel tell jurors he/she is guilty as charged and the evidence against is compelling blah, blah.  A significant number of trials result in an acquital.  CB hasn't even been questioned let alone charged.  The fact HCW said x, y, z means squat imo.

As you may know anything said in court is under privilege...Wolters isn't. The fact that he has made such statements in a country with strict privacy laws is therefore significant

[Mr Gray]

Maybe his previous lawyer ditched him ... because of threats made to stay away from the mcc case. IMO.



QUOTE Friedrich Fulscher

He admitted that ‘I don’t sleep as well as I used to’, partly due to threats he started receiving when he took on the case.

‘I’ve had threats, lots of them, some of them death threats,’ he said. ‘Some of them have been online and some of them have been on the phone.

‘I have pressed charges on some of them. I’ve also been told my life is in danger for looking into the Madeleine McCann case.’

He also said that he has been to Portugal to review years-worth of evidence collected in the case, and uncovered some ‘completely new’ information.

I don't believe a word of what he says

[kizzy]

As you may know anything said in court is under privilege...Wolters isn't. The fact that he has made such statements in a country with strict privacy laws is therefore significant

Not if what he said cant be backed up it isn't. seems to me he is a chancer.

[Holly Goodhead]

As you may know anything said in court is under privilege...Wolters isn't. The fact that he has made such statements in a country with strict privacy laws is therefore significant

HCW hasn't broken any privacy laws as he hasnt named CB only referred to him as Christian B.

[Holly Goodhead]

Not if what he said cant be backed up it isn't. seems to me he is a chancer.

Not forgetting he contradicts MET and Mc's re MM deceased. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Who seriously believes that prosecutors are paid to prosecute no matter how weak the evidence?  If that were the case CB would have been put on trial by now wouldn't he Holly?  And it's about three-quarters of all trials that end in a conviction btw, could be higher in Germany of course....

[Mr Gray]

Not forgetting he contradicts MET and Mc's re MM deceased.

He doesn't contradict anyone. Any sceptic will need to rubbish HCW because they cannot believe they could possibly be wrong

[Mr Gray]

Mark Saunokonoko summed up the sceptic position..he said he could not take CB seriously as a suspect because of the extensive evidence against the McCanns...such s the dogs...LOL

No sceptic can look at CB with an open mind because they would need to dismiss so much evidence they have accept ed as being significant.

I can see CB being convicted.. certainly not a certainty but who knows..

What will sceptics say then

Miscarriage of justice?