Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[Mr Gray]

You seem to want to put everyone in boxes!  I don't believe CB or Mc's responsible.

Martin Brunt tells us a.n.other has recently been under surveillance.  Friedrich Fulscher tells us he has received some anonymous info that will make Brits fall off their chairs!

The point I'm making and I think it's a perfectly valid point is that some posters cannot accept there is evidence against CB because even though it's highlY likely he is the perp they cannot let go of the beliefs they have adopted already...is totally closed mind.
Mark S clearly confirmed this.  All my opinion


Posters can insist CB is an idiot and s chancer with no evidence to support it... doesn't matter...we will soon know who the real idiot is....HCW or the person who has accused him

[Vertigo Swirl]

You seem to want to put everyone in boxes!  I don't believe CB or Mc's responsible.

Martin Brunt tells us a.n.other has recently been under surveillance.  Friedrich Fulscher tells us he has received some anonymous info that will make Brits fall off their chairs!

Shouldn't be long now - in the meantime I'm steering clear of chairs.

[Eleanor]

You seem to want to put everyone in boxes!  I don't believe CB or Mc's responsible.

Martin Brunt tells us a.n.other has recently been under surveillance.  Friedrich Fulscher tells us he has received some anonymous info that will make Brits fall off their chairs!

Fall off their chairs laughing.

[Holly Goodhead]

The point I'm making and I think it's a perfectly valid point is that some posters cannot accept there is evidence against CB because even though it's highlY likely he is the perp they cannot let go of the beliefs they have adopted already...is totally closed mind.
Mark S clearly confirmed this.  All my opinion


Posters can insist CB is an idiot and s chancer with no evidence to support it... doesn't matter...we will soon know who the real idiot is....HCW or the person who has accused him

But I don't see any evidence against CB.  No one even knows for sure the motive.

[Mr Gray]

But I don't see any evidence against CB.  No one even knows for sure the motive.

The fact you don't see it may be because you are blinded by your beliefs...one of his posts on the dark web is reported as...I want to find something small and use it for days.... evidence and motive

[Mr Gray]

Interesting point comparing HCW and FF

In a court case the defence can lie its head off...theres no penalty ....
The prosecution cannot

[Brietta]

But I don't see any evidence against CB.  No one even knows for sure the motive.

You may see no evidence against Brueckner but that is not as the professional investigators have seen it.  I think it has been a long hard haul for them and I certainly think that there is bound to be far more evidence against him than ever was against Kate and Gerry since the prejudices of Amaral's investigation just did not translate to any evidence at all against them.

Snip

Suspect was known from investigation

Metropolitan Police Deputy Deputy Commissioner Stuart Cundy said on Wednesday that the suspect became of interest to investigators following a public appeal in 2017, as part of the 10th anniversary of the disappearance. “This man's name was known from our investigation. I will not give details about how it was known, but it was already known before we received new information in 2017. Since then, we have continued to work very closely with colleagues in Portugal and Germany ”, he said.

This man is the current line of investigation by the British police, which came to identify 600 "people of interest" and four other suspects, who were discarded after being interrogated and searches carried out on land in Portugal.

“We have good relations with colleagues in both countries. And I know that we are all determined to find out what happened and see if this man was involved in Madeleine's disappearance or not, ”he said.

https://www.publico.pt/2020/06/03/sociedade/noticia/homem-preso-alemanha-novo-suspeito-caso-madeleine-mccann-1919329

[kizzy]

He doesn't contradict anyone. Any sceptic will need to rubbish HCW because they cannot believe they could possibly be wrong

Not at all, it is just so obvious to some that there is no way CB is the alleged abductor

Nothing has changed for me from the first post I put on here [don't hold your breath] 4 months ago,

You are proving nothing D apart from taking everything HCW says as gospel.

The fact they have known about him 3 years proves the last 4 months was there best shot at getting something.

All they have hit is a dead end.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Not at all, it is just so obvious to some that there is no way CB is the alleged abductor

Nothing has changed for me from the first post I put on here [don't hold your breath] 4 months ago,

You are proving nothing D apart from taking everything HCW says as gospel.

The fact they have known about him 3 years proves the last 4 months was there best shot at getting something.

All they have hit is a dead end.

Why is it not possible that CB is the abductor?  Rule him out for us.

[Mr Gray]

Not at all, it is just so obvious to some that there is no way CB is the alleged abductor

Nothing has changed for me from the first post I put on here [don't hold your breath] 4 months ago,

You are proving nothing D apart from taking everything HCW says as gospel.

The fact they have known about him 3 years proves the last 4 months was there best shot at getting something.

All they have hit is a dead end.

I dont take anything as gospel...you are simply so entrenched in your beleifs you cannot consider anything that contradicts it...however compelling...cognitive dissonance almost.

Dont assume you know anything about how my mind and reasoning works. logically CB is  a perefct candidate for an abduction...the only reason you wont accept the evidence as being possibly correct is because you simply cannot accept an abduction is possible. Thats where all your reasoning and logic falls apart.

I'm looking forward to how you react when all your beliefs start to fall apart...should be very interesting and now is just the start. its caused a lot of toxocity on the forum already...again....IMO.


Whether CB is convicted or not I think we will see that  there is concrete evidence against him....i think conviction is highly probable...looking at all that HCW has said

[Lace]

Not at all, it is just so obvious to some that there is no way CB is the alleged abductor

Nothing has changed for me from the first post I put on here [don't hold your breath] 4 months ago,

You are proving nothing D apart from taking everything HCW says as gospel.

The fact they have known about him 3 years proves the last 4 months was there best shot at getting something.

All they have hit is a dead end.

Can you explain why the German Police believe CB is their man?

[Anthro]

 

But I don't see any evidence against CB.  No one even knows for sure the motive.

You don’t see any evidence, because the German prosecutor is not sharing any within the public domain.

[Mr Gray]

Not at all, it is just so obvious to some that there is no way CB is the alleged abductor

Nothing has changed for me from the first post I put on here [don't hold your breath] 4 months ago,

You are proving nothing D apart from taking everything HCW says as gospel.

The fact they have known about him 3 years proves the last 4 months was there best shot at getting something.

All they have hit is a dead end.

can you expalin how he can be 100% ruled out...of course you can't. therefore it is not obvious he is not an abdcuctor

[John]

WARNING RE FORUM DISRUPTION:

It has been brought to my attention that some members are engaged in an activity which can only be viewed as a malicious disruption of the forum. This will not be allowed to continue!

Let me be very clear. If this conduct does not cease immediately I will delete the accounts of the offenders.

[kizzy]

I dont take anything as gospel...you are simply so entrenched in your beleifs you cannot consider anything that contradicts it...however compelling...cognitive dissonance almost.

Dont assume you know anything about how my mind and reasoning works. logically CB is  a perefct candidate for an abduction...the only reason you wont accept the evidence as being possibly correct is because you simply cannot accept an abduction is possible. Thats where all your reasoning and logic falls apart.

I'm looking forward to how you react when all your beliefs start to fall apart...should be very interesting and now is just the start. its caused a lot of toxocity on the forum already...again....IMO.


Whether CB is convicted or not I think we will see that  there is concrete evidence against him....i think conviction is highly probable...looking at all that HCW has said

I have thought there was no abduction from the bed way back in May 2007, of course, I stand by my belief do you think I would be on here if I didn't.

If I thought the mccs truly innocent ...I would not see a reason at all to be on here constantly protesting there innocence.

As for how your mind works D you mention it often enough about how you understand, everything..even to the point you portray yourself as a SA in your posts.

Why do you think my belief will fall apart ...it could be yours...you could go before me so I don't no why you think  there is toxicity, just because I don't belive a word the mccs say.

It should be understood also my lack of empathy for the mccs if I believe they were involved. imo


I don't assume anything about you or how your mind works ...because I only know you as a poster on a forum and go by that.[not you as a person]

As for me saying you take every word as gospel IMO that is how your posts come across. again the below says it all

.i think conviction is highly probable...looking at all that HCW has said