Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300401 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1425 on: October 15, 2020, 10:40:06 AM »
Have you watched the "60 Minute" Video?

Trial by tv.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1426 on: October 15, 2020, 11:09:09 AM »
Trial by tv.

So it was all Lies then, was it?

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1427 on: October 15, 2020, 11:11:35 AM »
So it was all Lies then, was it?

What did you learn from it Eleanor?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1428 on: October 15, 2020, 11:13:30 AM »
What did you learn from it Eleanor?

what about CB allegedly saying ....who doesnt want to find something small and use it for days....I will document the torture..


he says he will document the torture...not he would. Its a sthogh he already had it planned

did you watch it
« Last Edit: October 15, 2020, 12:26:40 PM by Davel »

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1429 on: October 15, 2020, 11:21:21 AM »
What did you learn from it Eleanor?

Watch it yourself.  You aren't interested in my opinion.  So please don't pretend that you are.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1430 on: October 15, 2020, 11:30:29 AM »
Watch it yourself.  You aren't interested in my opinion.  So please don't pretend that you are.

I have watched it. I'm interested in why you mentioned it as you seem to think it says something significant. It seems that whatever that is won't be explained, so it's probably not important.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1431 on: October 15, 2020, 11:34:22 AM »
I have watched it. I'm interested in why you mentioned it as you seem to think it says something significant. It seems that whatever that is won't be explained, so it's probably not important.

What did you learn from it, Gunit?

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1432 on: October 15, 2020, 12:13:39 PM »
What did you learn from it, Gunit?

When you share your thoughts on the programme I will do likewise.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1433 on: October 15, 2020, 12:17:45 PM »
I have watched it. I'm interested in why you mentioned it as you seem to think it says something significant. It seems that whatever that is won't be explained, so it's probably not important.

Do you not think the German prosecutor saying he has enough evidence to show his suspect killed MM is significant

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1434 on: October 15, 2020, 12:23:25 PM »
Do you not think the German prosecutor saying he has enough evidence to show his suspect killed MM is significant

That can only be done with a body and his dna upon the said victim or a snuff movie with victim and CB positively identified imo.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1435 on: October 15, 2020, 12:25:16 PM »
Actually, in the case of the Needhams and Barry George, there is NO evidence implicating them. The same can't be said of the McCann case imo.

In my opinion there is nothing which Amaral used as evidence which implicates them from "The Badly Told Story" to Calpol being a sedative to the dogs to the misinterpreted forensic results.

But the prosecutors hit the nail bang on the head when they continued ...

Even if, hypothetically, one could admit that Gerald and Kate McCann might be responsible over the child's death, it would still have to be explained how, where through, when, with what means, with the help of whom and where to they freed themselves of her body within the restricted time frame that would have been available to them to do so.
Their daily routine, until the 3rd of May, had been circumscribed to the narrow borders of the 'Ocean Club' resort and to the beach that lies next to it, unknowing the surrounding terrain and, apart from the English friends that were with them on holiday there, they had no known friends or contacts in Portugal.


Unsurprisingly Amaral could not come up with an answer to that one.  And over the past thirteen+ years neither could anyone else for the simple reason there is no evidence against Gerry and Kate whatsoever.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1436 on: October 15, 2020, 12:27:45 PM »
That can only be done with a body and his dna upon the said victim or a snuff movie with victim and CB positively identified imo.

that would be proof...not evidence. Its amazing how many posters dont understand the difference

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1437 on: October 15, 2020, 12:32:02 PM »
that would be proof...not evidence. Its amazing how many posters dont understand the difference

Only if one of CB's mate's blabbing is it evidence, but not proof which imo is the sticking point.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1438 on: October 15, 2020, 12:36:04 PM »
Only if one of CB's mate's blabbing is it evidence, but not proof which imo is the sticking point.

he hasnt said he has proof...he said he has evidence which as yet ahas not been revealed ...so its not his mates

Offline The General

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1439 on: October 15, 2020, 12:39:18 PM »
Do you not think the German prosecutor saying he has enough evidence to show his suspect killed MM is significant
I don't. It's a useless, futile concept without further corroboration.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.